김수영 시론에 있어서 전위성의 성격과 기원
The Aestheticist Avant-garde in Kim Soo-young: Its Nature and Origin
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Kim Soo-young, a post-war Korean poet, has historical significance in Korean modern poetry in that he had intended to integrate Avant-garde(or modernism) and Engagement(political participation). But after that integration in his criticism, his avant-garde was still not escape the nature of aesthetic modernism. Because he had appreciated avant-garde as an aestheticist literary project, avant-guard and engagement in his criticism were always confrontational. His idea stemmed from Japanese Avant-garde of Shi to shiron by Haruyama Yukio and Nishiwaki Kitagawa. Haruyama and Nishiwaki’s avant-garde was an pure surrealist movement which was completely excluded from the possibility of political participation. In the 1960s, Kim recognized his own limitation and tried to overcome it. But because of his traffic accident, his efforts ended in an uncompleted project. By this limitation, Kim Soo-young’s try to integrate avant-garde and political participation produced enormous logical contradictions. Consequently most of his articles had tried to discuss the possibility of political participation in avant-garde poetry had ambiguities and leaps in his logic. In his criticism, many concepts such as ‘experimentation, ambiguity, chaos, freedom, resistant poems’ are often incoherent and lacking continuity.
Abstract
Kim Soo-young, a post-war Korean poet, has historical significance in Korean modern poetry in that he had intended to integrate Avant-garde(or modernism) and Engagement(political participation). But after that integration in his criticism, his avant-garde was still not escape the nature of aesthetic modernism. Because he had appreciated avant-garde as an aestheticist literary project, avant-guard and engagement in his criticism were always confrontational. His idea stemmed from Japanese Avant-garde of Shi to shiron by Haruyama Yukio and Nishiwaki Kitagawa. Haruyama and Nishiwaki’s avant-garde was an pure surrealist movement which was completely excluded from the possibility of political participation. In the 1960s, Kim recognized his own limitation and tried to overcome it. But because of his traffic accident, his efforts ended in an uncompleted project. By this limitation, Kim Soo-young’s try to integrate avant-garde and political participation produced enormous logical contradictions. Consequently most of his articles had tried to discuss the possibility of political participation in avant-garde poetry had ambiguities and leaps in his logic. In his criticism, many concepts such as ‘experimentation, ambiguity, chaos, freedom, resistant poems’ are often incoherent and lacking continuity.
참고문헌 (28)
- 김경린, "한국 모더니즘 시운동 대표 동인 시선" (1994), 앞선책
- 김명인, "김수영, 근대를 향한 모험" (2002), 소명출판
- 김수영, "김수영 전집1 시" (2006), 민음사
- 김수영, "김수영 전집2 산문" (2006), 민음사
- 김행숙, "‘시적인 것’과 ‘정치적인 것’ -김수영의 시론 「시여, 침을 뱉어라」를 중심으로", 국제어문, (47), pp.9~34 (2009), 국제어문학회
- 맹문재, "박인환 전집" (2008), 실천문학사
- 박수연, "전근대에서 근대로, 근대에서 다른 근대로", 실천문학, 56(겨울) (1999)
- 박현수, "한국 모더니즘 시학" (2007), 신구문화사
- 방민호, "박인환전집-사랑은 가고 과거는 남는 것" (2006), 예옥
- 엄동섭, "신시론 연구" (2007), 태영출판사
- 오세영, "20세기 한국시인론" (2005), 월인
- 임홍배, "20세기 아방가르드 문예이론의 정치적 지평", 독일어문화권연구, 12 (2003), 서울대학교 독일어문화권연구소
- 정우택, "해방기 박인환 시의 정치적 아우라와 전향의 반향", 반교어문연구, (32), pp.287~322 (2012), 반교어문학회
- 최예열, "1950년대 전후문학비평 자료(1)" (2005), 월인
- 최하림, "김수영평전" (2001), 실천문학사
- 황동규, "김수영의 문학" (1983), 민음사
- 渡辺正彦, "近代文學9" (1977), 有斐閣双書
- 杉本春生, "近代文學9" (1977), 有斐閣双書
- 小野隆, "近代文學9" (1977), 有斐閣双書
- 阿毛久芳, "日本文學講座10, 詩歌Ⅱ" (1988), 大修館書店
- 岩成達也, "モダニズムの詩論群(上)", 現代詩手帖 (1988)
- 中野嘉一, "モダニズ厶詩の時代" (1986), 宝文館出版
- 千葉宣一, "日本近代文學の比較文學的硏究" (1971), 淸水弘文堂
- 春山行夫, "詩と詩論-現代詩の出發" (1980), 冬至書房新社
- Breton, "Paths to the Present" (1970), Dodd, Mead and company
- Nadeau, Maurice, "초현실주의의 역사" (1985), 고려원
- Ranciere, Jacques, "정치적인 것의 가장 자리에서" (2008), 길
- Ranciere, Jacques, "감성의 분할" (2008), 도서출판b
