평창조직위 거버넌스 분석을 통한 향후 메가 스포츠 이벤트 개선방안 연구
Deriving improvement plans for the future mega sport event by analyzing governance of the 2018 Pyeong Chang Winter Olympic Organizing Committee
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
[목적] 본 연구는 평창조직위의 거버넌스를 분석하여 향후 메가 스포츠 이벤트 조직위원회가 활용할 수 있는 거버넌스 모델을 제시하는 데 그 목적이 있다. [방법] 평창조직위 내·외부 관계자 5명을 대상으로 심층면담을 진행하였고, 대상자들에게 평창조직위 지휘부의 리더십에 대한 평가, 평창조직위 구성원들 간의 업무협력도, 그리고 향후 개선방안 등에 대한 의견을 종합한 뒤 연구결과를 도출하였다. [결과] 첫째, 평창조직위는 정부 형태의 조직 시스템을 구축하여 공직과 민간의 융합을 통한 조직운영을 시도하였다. 둘째, 평창조직위 지휘부의 리더십은 올림픽 조직위원회를 운영하는 데 있어 효율적이지 않았다. 셋째, 평창조직위 구성원들 간의 업무협력관계는 원활하지 못하였다. 마지막으로, 대상자들은 향후 메가 스포츠 이벤트를 위해 다수의 전문가 채용, 인사이동을 최소화할 수 있는 맞춤형 인사제도 도입, 그리고 사기업 형태의 조직위원회 구축 등을 제안하였다. [결론] 본 연구는 미래의 메가 스포츠 이벤트 조직위원회가 효과적인 거버넌스를 구축하여 전문성과 경험 있는 인원들이 유치부터 폐막까지의 연속성 있게 업무를 진행할 수 있는 환경을 조성하고, 합리적이고 창조적인 조직경영을 위한 사기업 형태의 조직 구축을 고려해볼 것을 제안한다.
Abstract
[Purpose] The purpose of this study is to review the governance of the 2018 Pyeong Chang Winter Olympic Organizing Committee(POCOG), and to suggest potential governance models for the next mega sport event organizing committee. [Methods] For this study, In-depth Interview was conducted on 5 subjects who were involved in the process of organizing Pyeong Chang Olympic Games internally and also externally. Throughout the interviews, the subjects were asked to answer questions about the leadership of POCOG management, working relationships among the staff members, and improvement plans for the next mega event. [Results] The results of the study are as follows: First, POCOG sat up a governmental system and then tried to blend government officials and people from private sector to run the committee; Second, POCOG leadership was not an effective to run an Olympic Organizing Committee; Third, there were not effective working relationships among the staff members in the committee; Lastly, the subjects proposed the future organizing committee to hire more experts, to establish some kind of system that can prevent the turnover, and to go for privatization with the limited involvement from the government. [Conclusions] Therefore, this study suggests that the future mega sport event organizing committee should implement effective governance in bring more experts, and keeping them from the beginning to the end of the event. Also the organizing committee should consider implementing corporate governance to run the committee with entrepreneurial mindset, and to create cooperative working environment among the committee members.
참고문헌 (29)
- "Pyeongchang Olympic Games generated profit?" (2018)[URL]
- 최성욱, "메가이벤트의 거버넌스양식 분석: 대전세계박람회와 여수세계박람회 간의 비교", 국정관리연구, 9(1), pp.25~57 (2014), 성균관대학교 국정전문대학원[DOI]
- "President Cho resigned. ex-minister Lee Hee-bum was nominated as the next president" (2016)[URL]
- "Deficit of 300 billion wons dramatically turns into surplus of 20.1 billion wons" (2018)[URL]
- "Gangwon province, started ‘2021 winter asian games’ bidding process" (2018)[URL]
- Kim, Y. C., "Qualitative research methodology 1 Bricoleur" (2012), Academy Press
- "Pyeongchang Olympic Games 3 bodies 4 legs" (2014)[URL]
- "Week influence over the issue of hosting olympic games with North Korea from Pyeong Chang Organizing Committee" (2015)[URL]
- "Pyeong Chang will fail 200% if it keep going this way" (2015)[URL]
- "Tokyo saved 1 trillion wons, what about Pyeongchang?" (2015)[URL]
- Researching sports governance for maximizing local development, "Lee, S. I", Korean Alliance For Health, Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance, 22~39 (2010)
- "Pyeong Chang Organizing Committee was shocked by president Cho’s resignation" (2016)[URL]
- Lee, Y. T., "Qualification of mega event host nation 'mega event governance'", Korea Culture & Tourism Institute, 48, pp.4~5 (2012)
- "Pyeongchang started with worries and end with compliments" (2018)[URL]
- 임도빈, "올림픽 거버넌스 조직현상: 서울올림픽과 평창올림픽 조직위원회의 비교", 한국조직학회보, 13(3), pp.149~182 (2016), 한국조직학회[DOI]
- Merriam, S. B., "Quantitative Research" (2009), John Wiley & Sons
- 박진경, "동계스포츠 국제경쟁력 강화를 위한 스포츠거버넌스 구축방안", 한국체육정책학회지, 9(1), pp.55~73 (2011), 한국체육정책학회
- "Increasing financial burden on Gangwon province after Pyeongchang Olympics" (2018)[URL]
- Peters, B. G, "Debating Governance" (2000), Oxford University Press
- 2012 official games preparation report, "Pyeong Chang Organizing Committee of the Olympic Games and Paralympic Games", ~ (2013)
- 2013 official games preparation report, "Pyeong Chang Organizing Committee of the Olympic Games and Paralympic Games", ~ (2014)
- 2014 official games preparation report, "Pyeong Chang Organizing Committee of the Olympic Games and Paralympic Games", ~ (2015)
- 2016 official games preparation report, "Pyeong Chang Organizing Committee of the Olympic Games and Paralympic Games", ~ (2017)
- Ro, J. J., "A study on the development of leisure attitude through indepth-interview", Korean Alliance For Health, Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance, 35(4), pp.4465~4479 (1996)
- 류동수, "지역 스포츠이벤트의 지속가능성을 위한 거버넌스 모형 구축", 한국체육정책학회지, 12(3), pp.27~44 (2014), 한국체육정책학회
- Seidman, I, "Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences" (2006), Teachers College Press
- London 2012 Olympic Games official report volume 3, "The London Organizing Committee of the Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Ltd", ~ (2013)
- 양성철, "2018 평창동계올림픽 & 패럴림픽 조직위원회 환경 분석 연구", 한국체육학회지, 57(1), pp.275~290 (2018), 한국체육학회
- "South Korea became 5th nation to host 4 major sporting events" (2018)[URL]