The Concept of “China as a Responsible Stakeholder”: Seen from Washington, Beijing and Seoul
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In 2005, the then U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Robert Zoellick proposed the concept of China as a “responsible stakeholder (RS).” There has been considerable discussion and debate over the meaning of the concept and its applicability to China. The germination stage of the concept was marked by an amicable bilateral environment fostered by a sense of expectation by the U.S. toward China, and a corresponding Chinese desire to meet those very expectations. However, such favorable sentiments toward the RS concept waned somewhat due to the adoption of a more realistic viewpoint and differences in interests of both parties. As this contentious debate between the U.S. and China has progressed, other countries have retired to the role of spectators. The fear of being caught up in an undesirable situation by ‘taking sides’ was predominant among the countries peripheral to the issue. In particular, the example of South Korea, which lies close to China’s borders, can be given as evidence of such limited and restrained behavior.
Abstract
In 2005, the then U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Robert Zoellick proposed the concept of China as a “responsible stakeholder (RS).” There has been considerable discussion and debate over the meaning of the concept and its applicability to China. The germination stage of the concept was marked by an amicable bilateral environment fostered by a sense of expectation by the U.S. toward China, and a corresponding Chinese desire to meet those very expectations. However, such favorable sentiments toward the RS concept waned somewhat due to the adoption of a more realistic viewpoint and differences in interests of both parties. As this contentious debate between the U.S. and China has progressed, other countries have retired to the role of spectators. The fear of being caught up in an undesirable situation by ‘taking sides’ was predominant among the countries peripheral to the issue. In particular, the example of South Korea, which lies close to China’s borders, can be given as evidence of such limited and restrained behavior.
참고문헌 (40)
- "Is China at Present (or Will China Become) a Responsible Stakeholder in the International Community"[URL]
- Caryl, Christian, "Beijing and Washington:Rivals in Asia", ~ (2007)
- 차창훈, "전략적 경쟁자(strategic competitor) 혹은 이익공유자(stakeholder)?, 미중 군사교류에 대한 일 고찰", 국제정치논총, 46(2), pp.81~103 (2006), 한국국제정치학회
- "China’s Role in the World: Is China a Responsible Stakeholder?", Remarks before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, 3 (2006)
- Chung, Jae Ho, "From a ‘Special Relationship’ to Normal Partnership?: Interpreting the ‘Garlic Battle’ in Sino-South Korean Relations", Pacific Affairs, 76(4) (2003)
- Cristensen, Thomas, "Will China become a ‘responsible stakeholder’? – The six-party talks, Taiwan arms sales, and Sino-Japanese rela", China Leadership Monitor, (16) (2005)
- "Can ‘responsible stakeholder’ hold?"[URL]
- "China becoming a responsible stakeholder"[URL]
- Melvin Gurtov, "China and the United States: Responsible Stakeholder or Emerging Threat?", Asian Perspective, 32(4), pp.181~183 (2008), 극동문제연구소
- 한석희, "중국의 부상과 책임대국론: 서구와 중국의 인식적 차이를 중심으로", 국제정치논총, 44(1), pp.191~210 (2004), 한국국제정치학회
- A Korean perspective on the future of ROK-U.S. relations, "Hwang, Jaeho", ~, pp.PacNet Newsletter, No. 54A (2009)
- Hwang, Jaeho, "China’s Future Rise and South Korea’s Security Implications", The Journal of East Asian Affairs, 21(2) (2007)
- "Interview with Prof. Chung Jae Ho"[URL]
- Kim, Woo-sang, "The Initialization of a New Asia Foreign Policy" (2008), Newsweek
- Lee Keun, "The Rise of China and Korea’s China Policy. in: The Rise of China and Changing East Asian Order" (2004), Japan Center for International Exchange
- Liu Aming, "U.S. Response to China’s Rise", Xiandai Guoji Guanxi, 4 (2006)
- Deputy Director of Division I of the World Military Research Department at the Chinese PLA Academy of Military Science. Positive signs from Sino-U.S. military exchanges, "Liu Zhiyuan", People’s Daily Online, ~ (2007)
- "2007", 1
- Pang Zhongying, "China’s Role and Status in the International System", Xiandai Guoji Guanxi, 7 (2006)
- 박홍서, "탈냉전기 중미간 ‘협조체제’의 출현?: 9.19 공동성명 후 북핵문제에 대한 중미간 협력", 국제정치논총, 47(3), pp.77~97 (2007), 한국국제정치학회
- "New vocabulary ushers China-U.S. relations into global scenarios"[URL]
- Remarks by President Hu Jintao of The People’s Republic of China at Welcoming Luncheon at the White House Hosted by President George W. Bush of the United States of America, "People’s Daily Online", ~ (2006)
- Reframing China Policy – China as a Responsible Stakeholder. The Carnegie Debates 2006-2007, , ~ (2007)
- Shin Kak-Soo, "The Implications of the Rise of China for South Korean Foreign Policy", Korea and World Affairs, 31(1) (2007)
- "Sino-U.S. relations in the 21st century and South Korea’s strategic choice", Research for International Affairs (in Korean), 4(2) (2004)
- 손병권, "중국의 부상에 대한 미국의 대응", 세계지역연구논총, 25(1), pp.128~149 (2007), 한국세계지역학회
- Song, Dae-Sung, "Transformation of U.S. Forces in Korea and Korean National Security: Response Policy and Complementation", Sejong Policy Studies, 3(2) (2007)
- Quadrennial Defense Review Report, "U.S. Department of Defense", ~ (2006)
- Summary of Remarks by Ambassador China and the Future of the World, "Wang Guangya", ~ (2006)
- Wang Jianwei, "Can ‘stakeholder’ hold U.S.-China relations? PacNet #17A", PacNet #17A.May 11, ~ (2006)
- Xing Yue, "A Constructivism Analysis on China’s Current Diplomacy: New Status, New Interests, New Vision", Xiandai Guoji Guanxi, 2 (2006)
- Yang Wenchang, "President of the Chinese People’s Institute of Foreign Affairs. in: Time to correct those Western misconceptions" (2007), People’s Daily Online
- Yuan Peng, "The Harmonious World and China’s New Diplomacy", Xiandai Guoji Guanxi, 4 (2007)
- Whither China: From Membership to Responsibility, "Zoellick, Robert", Remarks to the National Committee on U.S.-China Relations, ~ (2005)