본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Beijing’s Dilemma and Preference on the Korean Peninsula: Responses to the 2010 Korean Crises

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The ROK is a major contributing partner to China’s economic prosperity. The ROK is China’s third largest trading partner and the fourth largest investor. The total amount of trade with China, including Hong Kong, is bigger than the sum of the next nine trading partners’ all combined, including the United States and Japan, the second and third largest partners, respectively. However, despite the deep economic ties between the two countries, Seoul was frustrated with Beijing’s support for Pyongyang during the 2010 Korean crises. China faces a dilemma in the 2010 Korean crises in its efforts to maintain equidistant between Seoul and Pyongyang. However, Beijing is likely to lean toward Pyongyang because doing so will contribute to China’s inherent national goals: continue the CCP’s political rule, preserve national integrity, and strengthen its global power status. In addition, due to the 1961 Treaty of Friendship and Cooperation with Pyongyang, Beijing’s support for Pyongyang is likely to persist. However, there is a limit; Pyongyang should not step beyond Beijing’s level of tolerance. The degree of tolerance is the dilemma that Beijing faces, and at the moment, it prefers to maintain equidistant between Seoul and Pyongyang. However, if Pyongyang adopts a Chinese style of reform, the dilemma could disappear. Beijing should persuade Pyongyang to follow China’s reform and open policy. Whether this will succeed or not depends on the self confidence of Pyongyang’s inner circle in both the domestic and international environments.

Abstract

The ROK is a major contributing partner to China’s economic prosperity. The ROK is China’s third largest trading partner and the fourth largest investor. The total amount of trade with China, including Hong Kong, is bigger than the sum of the next nine trading partners’ all combined, including the United States and Japan, the second and third largest partners, respectively. However, despite the deep economic ties between the two countries, Seoul was frustrated with Beijing’s support for Pyongyang during the 2010 Korean crises. China faces a dilemma in the 2010 Korean crises in its efforts to maintain equidistant between Seoul and Pyongyang. However, Beijing is likely to lean toward Pyongyang because doing so will contribute to China’s inherent national goals: continue the CCP’s political rule, preserve national integrity, and strengthen its global power status. In addition, due to the 1961 Treaty of Friendship and Cooperation with Pyongyang, Beijing’s support for Pyongyang is likely to persist. However, there is a limit; Pyongyang should not step beyond Beijing’s level of tolerance. The degree of tolerance is the dilemma that Beijing faces, and at the moment, it prefers to maintain equidistant between Seoul and Pyongyang. However, if Pyongyang adopts a Chinese style of reform, the dilemma could disappear. Beijing should persuade Pyongyang to follow China’s reform and open policy. Whether this will succeed or not depends on the self confidence of Pyongyang’s inner circle in both the domestic and international environments.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. "Bo Xilai scandal: Timeline.”" (2012)[URL]
  2. Chen, Qichen, "Wai Jiao Shi Ji" (2003), shijiezhishichubanshe
  3. Coleman, James S, "Foundations of Social Theory" (1990), The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press
  4. "pdf?OpenElement"[URL]
  5. [URL]
  6. "일본, 역사분쟁 자꾸 일으키면 美 지원 잃게 될 것"[URL]
  7. Ji, Pei-ding, "Development of China and Sino-Korea Relations", Foreign Relations, pp.49~59 (2011), Korean Council on Foreign Relations
  8. [URL]
  9. [URL]
  10. Kim, Taewan, "The Korean Paradox of the 1972 Sino-American Rapprochement: An East Asian Perspective", Ph.D., pp.1972
  11. 김태완, "중국 국가정체성의 변화: 공산주의에서 민족주의로", 국제관계연구, 15(2), pp.163~191 (2010), 일민국제관계연구원
  12. 김태완, "남북한 사이의 중국: 대 한반도정책 딜레마", 국제관계연구, 16(2), pp.37~73 (2011), 일민국제관계연구원
  13. Kim, Taewan, "An International Perspective on China’s Northeast Project", Journal of International Politics, 13(2)
  14. Lee, Jae-jin, "China and Korea: Dynamic Relations" (1996), Hoover Press
  15. Nathan, Andrew J, "How China Sees America: the Sum of Beijing’s Fears", Foreign Affairs, pp.32~47 (2012)
  16. Putnam, Robert D, "Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games", International Organization, 42(3), pp.427~460 (1988)
  17. Rosenau, James N, "Linkage Politics : Essays on the Convergence of National and International Systems" (1969), The Free Press
  18. "S. Korea Holds Naval Drills Amid Diplomacy Rush" (2010)[URL]
  19. Schaefer, Bernd, "Weathering the Sino-Soviet Conflict: The GDR and North Korea, 1949-1989", Cold War International History Project Bulletin, 14(15) (2004)
  20. "North Korean ‘adventurism’ and China’s Long Shadow, 1966-1972"[URL]
  21. Sharma, Ruchir, "Breakout Nations : In Pursuit of the Next Economic Miracles" (2012), W. W. Norton
  22. "中, 北붕괴 우려로 압박동참 안해"[URL]
  23. Waltz, Kenneth N. Man, "the State and War: A Theoretical Analysis" (1959), Columbia University Press
  24. "Property Rights in China Under The New Property Law"[URL]
  25. "웨이보 통제 위해 글삭제와 블로거회유"[URL]
  26. "South Korea postpones signing Japan’s military agreement" (2012)[URL]
  27. "What’s behind Obama’s late-night phone call to China’s President Hu Jintao about Korea" (2010)[URL]
  28. Zhao, Quansheng, "Interpreting Chinese Foreign Policy : The Micro-Macro Linkage Approach" (1996), Oxford University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)