본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

<조선농민사>와 <카프> 농민문학론의 창작 주체와 방법 연구

A Study on the Subject and Method of Creation in Peasant Literary Theory of ‘Chosun Nongminsa’ and ‘KAPF’

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

In this paper, Concretely, it tries to talk that it considers about the Subject and Method of Creation in theories about Peasant Literature of ‘Chosun Nongminsa’ and ‘KAPF’. And these relate closely because of giving the peasant poetry for example. As to ‘Chosun Nongminsa’ Peasant Literary Theory at first, the Subject of the Creation was the intellectual literary man. At the time of 1920's in the above Illiteracy Rate 80% the thing of thought is no problem. After ‘Chosun Nongminsa’ is recognized admitting the intellectual literary man or peasant. Afterward it admits only the peasant as the Subject of Creation in the Peasant Poetry. On the other hand, the ‘KAPF’ Peasant Literary Theory did firstly the intellectual literary man about Subject of Creation and had to guide the peasant writer. Heo Munil who was the peasant as the Subject of Creation that did the creative activity around ‘Chosun Nongminsa’. In the creating Method, it used the daily life poetic language of the peasant. It used the honorific ending sentence expressing the feeling of solidarity with peasant was used. And the early stage modern poetry form was accommodated and the form of (Dansi) in which 1 stanza of 1 line becomes one poem as the form of free verse was shown. On the other hand, Park Aji was the ‘KAPF’ member and the intellectual literary man as the Subject of Creation. He was firstly injected the ideology injection by the Method of Creation. and he was used the ideological poetic language and the end of a sentence expressing the leadership was used. He was the form of free verse showing the literary accomplishments of the intellectual accommodated and he was it can deliver the ideology well it showed the form series of poetry(Yeonjaksi) shown. Therefore, we could know from the Peasant Poetry of the peasant poet Heo Munil and intellectual poet Park Aji to be changed according to the Subject of Creation till Method of Creation. The Subject and Methods of Creation have been continuing as two kind of tendency into the contemporarily reality-oriented poetry. This can do in being the importance of the this paper.

Abstract

In this paper, Concretely, it tries to talk that it considers about the Subject and Method of Creation in theories about Peasant Literature of ‘Chosun Nongminsa’ and ‘KAPF’. And these relate closely because of giving the peasant poetry for example. As to ‘Chosun Nongminsa’ Peasant Literary Theory at first, the Subject of the Creation was the intellectual literary man. At the time of 1920's in the above Illiteracy Rate 80% the thing of thought is no problem. After ‘Chosun Nongminsa’ is recognized admitting the intellectual literary man or peasant. Afterward it admits only the peasant as the Subject of Creation in the Peasant Poetry. On the other hand, the ‘KAPF’ Peasant Literary Theory did firstly the intellectual literary man about Subject of Creation and had to guide the peasant writer. Heo Munil who was the peasant as the Subject of Creation that did the creative activity around ‘Chosun Nongminsa’. In the creating Method, it used the daily life poetic language of the peasant. It used the honorific ending sentence expressing the feeling of solidarity with peasant was used. And the early stage modern poetry form was accommodated and the form of (Dansi) in which 1 stanza of 1 line becomes one poem as the form of free verse was shown. On the other hand, Park Aji was the ‘KAPF’ member and the intellectual literary man as the Subject of Creation. He was firstly injected the ideology injection by the Method of Creation. and he was used the ideological poetic language and the end of a sentence expressing the leadership was used. He was the form of free verse showing the literary accomplishments of the intellectual accommodated and he was it can deliver the ideology well it showed the form series of poetry(Yeonjaksi) shown. Therefore, we could know from the Peasant Poetry of the peasant poet Heo Munil and intellectual poet Park Aji to be changed according to the Subject of Creation till Method of Creation. The Subject and Methods of Creation have been continuing as two kind of tendency into the contemporarily reality-oriented poetry. This can do in being the importance of the this paper.

참고문헌 (41)

  1. "조선농민", ~
  2. "농민", ~
  3. "비판", ~
  4. "혜성", ~
  5. "조선일보", ~
  6. "동아일보", ~
  7. "조선중앙일보", ~
  8. 김기진, "팔봉 문학전집" (1988), 문학과 지성사
  9. 서범석, "한국농민시" (1993), 고려원
  10. 안함광, "안함광 평론 선집1 인간과 문학" (1998), 박이정
  11. 여태천, "춘파 박재청 문학전집" (2010), 서정시학
  12. 권영민, "한국민족문학론연구" (1988), 민음사
  13. 김영민, "한국문학비평사" (1992), 한길사
  14. 김윤식, "한국근대문예비평사연구" (1980), 일지사
  15. 류양선, "한국농민문학연구" (1994), 서광학술자료사
  16. 서범석, "한국농민시연구" (1991), 고려원
  17. 서범석, "한국 농민시인론" (2004), 푸른사상사
  18. 성기각, "한국농민시와 현실인식" (2002), 국학자료원
  19. 신경림, "농민문학론" (1983), 온누리
  20. 권영민, "일제식민지시대의 농민운동과 농민문학론", 진단학보, 62, pp.143~160 (1986), 진단학회
  21. 김택호, "허문일의 농민소설 연구 ―천도교와 아나키즘의 관계를 중심으로", 국제어문, (33), pp.203~229 (2005), 국제어문학회
  22. 김택호, "천도교와 아나키즘의 결합 -조선농민사 기관지 <조선농민>과 <농민>을 중심으로", 동학학보, 15(1), pp.41~65 (2011), 동학학회
  23. 김영민, "1930년대 농민문학론 연구", 매지논총, 8, pp.39~60 (1991), 연세대학교매지학술연구소
  24. 김재석, "카프 농민문학론의 비판적 검토", 문학과언어, 13, pp.343~361 (1992), 문학과언어학회
  25. 김혜영, "카프 농민문학론의 비판적 검토", 강릉어문학, 8, pp.55~70 (1993)
  26. 노영택, "일제하 천도교의 농민운동 연구(1)", 한국사연구, (52), pp.153~182 (1986), 한국사연구회
  27. 류양선, "‘조선농민사’의 농민문학론과 농민소설", 관악어문연구, 13, pp.73~104 (1988), 서울대학교국어국문학과
  28. 柳楊善, "1930년 전후의 한국농민 문학론 연구", 박사, pp.1990
  29. 박남훈, "카프 농민문학론 연구", 외국문학, (23), pp.188~201 (1990), 열음사
  30. 박경수, "조선농민사의 농민문학론 연구", 어문교육논집, pp.175~202 (1994), 부산대학교사범대학국어교육과
  31. 서범석, "허문일의 농민문학 연구", 국제어문, (30), pp.153~186 (2004), 국제어문학회
  32. 서범석, "임연의 시문학과 천도교", 국어국문학, (136), pp.443~478 (2004), 국어국문학회
  33. 송준호, "KAPF 농민문학론 연구", 국어문학, 27, pp.245~268 (1989), 국어문학회
  34. 오세영, "일제하 한국의 농민문학론과 농민시 연구", 성곡논총, 22, pp.1969~2040 (1991), 성곡학술문화재단
  35. 이기인, "일제하 농민문학론 연구-지도비평으로서의 적절성과 한계-", 어문논집, 35, pp.633~664 (1996), 민족어문학회
  36. 장경택, "카프계 농민문학론의 재조명", 반교어문연구, 3, pp.199~212 (1991), 반교어문연구회
  37. 조진기, "한일농민문학론의 비교연구", 영남어문학, 31, pp.55~96 (1997), 영남어문학회
  38. 최원식, "농민문학을 위하여, In 한국문학의 현단계Ⅲ" (1984), 창작과 비평사
  39. 최현희, "일제하 농민문학론의 담론 구조", 영남학, (13), pp.401~429 (2008), 영남문화연구원
  40. 홍성식, "조선농민사의 농민문학론과 농민소설 연구", 한국문예비평연구, (28), pp.249~280 (2009), 한국현대문예비평학회
  41. 홍성식, "한국 근대 농민들의 문학의식과 농민시의 형성", 한국문예비평연구, (32), pp.259~284 (2010), 한국현대문예비평학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)