利用‘Stage Model’理论 及意向图式分析韩ㆍ中存在句
Using the theory of 'Stage Model' and Image schema analyze existential sentence of Korean and Chinese
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Based on KoreanㆍChinese existence sentences as the research object, try using Langacker ‘Stage Model' theory analyze and illustration KoreanㆍChinese existence sentences in cognitive perspective of comparative. The purpose of this paper is through the contrast analysis, it is concluded that in the process of human cognitive KoreanㆍChinese existential sentence's Image schema and its Stage Model. And explained the KoreanㆍChinese existence sentences on the fundamental cognitive difference as well as the structure of existential sentence in the presence of similarities and differences. Korean sentence ‘L에 T이/가 있다' and Chinese sentence ‘L有T’ is basically in conformity with the principle of ‘integral part' in the cognitive order. The areas with a larger cognitive range are in the presence of the smaller presence of people/things. But there are differences between the two languages. Korean ‘L에 T이/가 있다’ existential sentence attaches great importance to the existing ingredients. However, the Chinese '有' existential sentence attaches great importance to the place ingredients. The similarity between Korean and Chinese lies in the same cognitive order. The difference is that the Korean language is due to a change in the order of observation in which the syntactic components are changed. In Chinese, it is because the profile has changed, which leads to the main profile, namely the change of the trajector. But in Korean the trajector is always existing ingredients.
Abstract
Based on KoreanㆍChinese existence sentences as the research object, try using Langacker ‘Stage Model' theory analyze and illustration KoreanㆍChinese existence sentences in cognitive perspective of comparative. The purpose of this paper is through the contrast analysis, it is concluded that in the process of human cognitive KoreanㆍChinese existential sentence's Image schema and its Stage Model. And explained the KoreanㆍChinese existence sentences on the fundamental cognitive difference as well as the structure of existential sentence in the presence of similarities and differences. Korean sentence ‘L에 T이/가 있다' and Chinese sentence ‘L有T’ is basically in conformity with the principle of ‘integral part' in the cognitive order. The areas with a larger cognitive range are in the presence of the smaller presence of people/things. But there are differences between the two languages. Korean ‘L에 T이/가 있다’ existential sentence attaches great importance to the existing ingredients. However, the Chinese '有' existential sentence attaches great importance to the place ingredients. The similarity between Korean and Chinese lies in the same cognitive order. The difference is that the Korean language is due to a change in the order of observation in which the syntactic components are changed. In Chinese, it is because the profile has changed, which leads to the main profile, namely the change of the trajector. But in Korean the trajector is always existing ingredients.
참고문헌 (29)
- 고석주, "‘있다’의 의미에 대한 연구 - 어휘개념구조 표상을 중심으로 -", 한말연구, (20), pp.1~25 (2007), 한말연구학회[DOI]
- 김기혁, "국어 지정문과 존재문의 상관성", 한글, (271), pp.51~76 (2006), 한글학회
- 남기신, "국어 조사 용법 : ‘-에’와 ‘로’를 중심으로" (1993), 서광학술자료사
- 박양규, "소유와 소재", 국어학, 3 (1975)
- 박영순, "한국어 화용론" (2007), 박이정
- 서정수, "국어 문법" (2013), 뿌리 깊은 나무
- 신선경, "‘있다’의 소유 구문에 대한 소고", 울산어문논집, 11 (1996)
- 신성경, "‘있다’의 어휘 의미와 통사" (2002), 태학사
- 왕난난, "한·중 존재문의 구문 확장 대조 연구", 국어교육연구, (58), pp.199~224 (2015), 국어교육학회(since1969)[DOI]
- 장미라, "‘있다’의 의미 확장과 다의어 체계", 인문학연구, 9 (2005)
- 전영철, "한국어 존재문의 구성", 언어학, (27), pp.261~280 (2000), 사단법인 한국언어학회
- 金明艳, "韩汉存现句对比研究", 博士, pp.2013
- 刘月华, "实用现代汉语语法" (2001), 商务印书馆
- 潘文, "现代汉语存在句研究", 博士, pp.2003
- 范继淹, "论介词短语‘在+处所’", 语文研究, 1 (1982)
- 宋玉柱, "经历体存在句", 汉语学习, (5) (1991)
- 宋玉柱, "动态存在句", 汉语学习, (6) (1982)
- 宋玉柱, "完成体动态存在句", 汉语学习, (6) (1989)
- 温锁林, "从存现句看空间隐喻的认知基础与修辞动因", 当代修辞学, (3) (2008)
- 王寅, "认知语法概论" (2006), 上海外语教育出版社
- 储泽祥, "韩与存在句的历史性考察", 古汉语研究, (4) (1997)
- 陈庭珍, "汉语处所词做主语的存在句", 中国语文, (8) (1957)
- 沈家煊, "句法的象似性问题", 外语教学与研究, (1) (1993)
- 下, "认知语法导论上", pp.2016, 黄蓓译
- Hannay. M., "English Existential and Other Locatives", Language, 3 (1985)
- Langacker. R. W., "Concept, Image, and Symbol:The Cognitive Basis of Grammar", Cognitive Linguistics Research, 1 (1990)
- Langacker. R. W., "Foundations of Cognitive Grammar" (1991), Stanford University Press
- Langacker. R. W., "Grammar and Conceptualization" (2000), Mouton de Gruyter
- John R. Taylor, "Cognitive Grammar" (1996), Oxford University Press
