转折关系表达手段“即使、虽然”与“-아도、-지만”语义与逻辑关系对比考察
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF “Jishi、Suiran” AND “-Ado、-Jiman” IN SEMANTIC AND LOGICAL RELATIONS
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Because the relative transitional complex terms in Chinese and Korean have very complicated relations, they are difficult for Korean students learning Chinese. About the relative transitional complex terms“Jishi(即使)”and“Suiran(虽然)”, the frequency of utilization is high and they have many similarities in semantic relations, conveyed as well in their grammatical meaning, causing confusion between semantic biases. In the analysis, the similarities and differences between "Jishi(即使)" and "Suiran(虽然)" in their use will be analyzed from the perspective of logical semantics, and the logical and semantic characteristics between the Korean “-ado(-아도)” and “-jiman(-지만)” and their logical relations are discussed. Finally, we find out the main reasons why Korean students use the same type of words "Jishi(即使)" and "Suiran(虽然)". In comparison, if we start from a new perspective on the Chinese “Jishi(即使)” and "Suiran(虽然)" analysis, which is conducive to a deeper, clearer understanding of their usage.
Abstract
Because the relative transitional complex terms in Chinese and Korean have very complicated relations, they are difficult for Korean students learning Chinese. About the relative transitional complex terms“Jishi(即使)”and“Suiran(虽然)”, the frequency of utilization is high and they have many similarities in semantic relations, conveyed as well in their grammatical meaning, causing confusion between semantic biases. In the analysis, the similarities and differences between "Jishi(即使)" and "Suiran(虽然)" in their use will be analyzed from the perspective of logical semantics, and the logical and semantic characteristics between the Korean “-ado(-아도)” and “-jiman(-지만)” and their logical relations are discussed. Finally, we find out the main reasons why Korean students use the same type of words "Jishi(即使)" and "Suiran(虽然)". In comparison, if we start from a new perspective on the Chinese “Jishi(即使)” and "Suiran(虽然)" analysis, which is conducive to a deeper, clearer understanding of their usage.
참고문헌 (31)
- 吕叔湘, "现代汉语八百词" (1982), 商务印书馆
- 中国社科院语言研究所, "现代汉语词典" (2005), 商务印书馆
- 郭志良, "现代汉语转折词语研究" (1999), 北京语言文化大学出版社
- 戴悉心, "“即使”句的分类及其语义语用分析", 世界汉语教学, (2) (2001)
- 杜国平, "“即使p也q”句式的逻辑分析", 浙江社会科学, (7) (2011)
- 郭燕妮, "汉语转折复句研究综述", 长江大学学报, (2) (2008)
- 胡培安, "转折句的逻辑语义关系", 黄河科技大学学报, (3) (2000)
- 刘雪春, "“即使……也”式复句逻辑分析", 郑州大学学报, (3) (1998)
- 卢卓群, "“虽然”和“即使”有何异同？", 中学语文, (28) (2010)
- 吕明臣, "“即使…也…”的语义分析", 求索, (1) (2012)
- 梅立崇, "现代汉语的“即使”假言句", 世界汉语教学, (1) (1985)
- 谢奇勇, "也谈转折复句的内层蕴涵", 湖南科技大学学报 (2011)
- 邢福义, "“但”类词对几种复句的转化作用", 中国语文, (3) (1983)
- 邢福义, "现代汉语“即使”实言句", 语言教学与研究, (4) (1985)
- 邢福义, "现代汉语转折句式", 世界汉语教学, (2) (1992)
- 王忠良, "“即使……但是……”复句逻辑初探", 延边大学学报, (2) (1993)
- 严子寒, "关于“即使p，也q”句式语用误用的几点分析", 常州信息职业技术学院学报, (5) (2010)
- 戴兴敏, "汉语“虽”类和“但”类连词匹配框架及其类型学解释", 硕士, pp.2006
- 刘永红, "现代汉语转折复句的逻辑语义分析", 硕士, pp.2003
- 舒靖恒, "韩国语对立转折复句在汉语中的对应分析", 硕士, pp.2012
- 徐红叶, "韩国留学生转折复句偏误分析", 硕士, pp.2005
- 고려대민족문화연구, "고려대한중사전" (2004), 고려대민족문화연구원
- 국립국어연구원, "표준국어대사전" (1999), 두산동아한글학회
- 서희정, "한국어 교육에서 양보 연결어미에 대한 비판적 고찰", 새국어교육, (86), pp.185~208 (2010), 한국국어교육학회[DOI]
- 신지연, "대립과 양보 접속어미의 범주화", 어문학, (84), pp.75~98 (2004), 한국어문학회
- 이기동, "대조, 양보 접속어미에 대한 연구(1)", 어학 연구, 13(2) (1997)
- 유혜령, "『대립』과 『양보』의 접속어미 : 접속어미 『-지만, -으나, -어도』에 대한 연구", 석사, 국어국문, pp.1994
- 최금란, "중·한 전환관계 접속문 대응관계 소고", 중국어문학논집, (62), pp.135~155 (2010), 중국어문학연구회
- 최재희, "국어연결어미연구", 국어학회, (6) (1993)
- 최금자, "한·중 양보 표현에 대한 대비 연구", 석사, 국어학, pp.2011
- 崔在喜, "國語 接續文의 構成에 관한 硏究", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.1989