蘇軾의 詩書畵論이 高麗에 미친 영향에 대한 고찰
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article is about a study on the features of Sush's theory of Poem-Writing-Painting who is still admired as the best in Song dynasty in terms of Poem-Writing-Painting by the critics from the west, east, old age and contemporary age and showed unrivalled achievement and also on the trend how Goryeo people accepted and practiced his theory. The age of Song dynasty in which Sush lived was the era that advocated ‘the Idea for Civil Administration’, so that it was the age that was prevailed by the character of ‘Sangeui (尙意: Respecting the Idea)’ that upgraded the literary men’s own unique personality, will and character to the art. In addition, this age showed such looks as mutual penetration of Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism based ideas, spread of Zen Learning and mutual mixing of poem, writing and painting. As a result, this age naturally created the thoughts that appreciated the integration of literary men’s painting and poem placing the poem and painting on the same level. Thus, the painting belonging only to professional artists was accepted into Yeogi (餘技: hobbies) of the gentry community; and then began to be created as the gentry people’s own cultural enjoyment; and finally, the Theory for Uniformity of Poem, Writing and Painting was presented. The Theory for Uniformity of Poem, Writing and Painting was earnestly advocated and practiced by Sush who claimed that the artistic value was closely related with the individual author's own personality. Such theory of art of his has a big significance in the history of Chinese literature, word-writing and painting ideas in the aspect that such theory was formed by going through the artistic spirit dwelling in Chinese genuine Poem-Writing-Painting at a constant axis. This idea of his did not only play an important role in the later Chinese culture but also tremendously influence Goryeo. Sush may have been an ultra-nationalist who had the viewpoint of anti-Goryeo in the diplomatic history between Song and Goryeo. The intellectuals of Goryeo, however, positively accepted his literatures and arts even with such an ultra-nationalism based works of his. For, he presented some goals and hopes to the Goryeo people by showing the intellectuals of Goryeo a good example in the art and life; forming their common response to his attitude that appreciated his life of hardship; and making them experience his artistic success through a number of his work-pieces. We can say that Goryeo people did not only accept and love his literatures and arts but also furthermore upgrade them to the artistic work-pieces that met Korean sense based on the inspiration they gained from his work-pieces. It is true that Goryeo made a big achievement and progress in Chinese literature and Writing-Painting. Nobody may deny it. It is also thought that Sush's influence cannot be ignored in such a big achievement and progress.
Abstract
This article is about a study on the features of Sush's theory of Poem-Writing-Painting who is still admired as the best in Song dynasty in terms of Poem-Writing-Painting by the critics from the west, east, old age and contemporary age and showed unrivalled achievement and also on the trend how Goryeo people accepted and practiced his theory. The age of Song dynasty in which Sush lived was the era that advocated ‘the Idea for Civil Administration’, so that it was the age that was prevailed by the character of ‘Sangeui (尙意: Respecting the Idea)’ that upgraded the literary men’s own unique personality, will and character to the art. In addition, this age showed such looks as mutual penetration of Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism based ideas, spread of Zen Learning and mutual mixing of poem, writing and painting. As a result, this age naturally created the thoughts that appreciated the integration of literary men’s painting and poem placing the poem and painting on the same level. Thus, the painting belonging only to professional artists was accepted into Yeogi (餘技: hobbies) of the gentry community; and then began to be created as the gentry people’s own cultural enjoyment; and finally, the Theory for Uniformity of Poem, Writing and Painting was presented. The Theory for Uniformity of Poem, Writing and Painting was earnestly advocated and practiced by Sush who claimed that the artistic value was closely related with the individual author's own personality. Such theory of art of his has a big significance in the history of Chinese literature, word-writing and painting ideas in the aspect that such theory was formed by going through the artistic spirit dwelling in Chinese genuine Poem-Writing-Painting at a constant axis. This idea of his did not only play an important role in the later Chinese culture but also tremendously influence Goryeo. Sush may have been an ultra-nationalist who had the viewpoint of anti-Goryeo in the diplomatic history between Song and Goryeo. The intellectuals of Goryeo, however, positively accepted his literatures and arts even with such an ultra-nationalism based works of his. For, he presented some goals and hopes to the Goryeo people by showing the intellectuals of Goryeo a good example in the art and life; forming their common response to his attitude that appreciated his life of hardship; and making them experience his artistic success through a number of his work-pieces. We can say that Goryeo people did not only accept and love his literatures and arts but also furthermore upgrade them to the artistic work-pieces that met Korean sense based on the inspiration they gained from his work-pieces. It is true that Goryeo made a big achievement and progress in Chinese literature and Writing-Painting. Nobody may deny it. It is also thought that Sush's influence cannot be ignored in such a big achievement and progress.
참고문헌 (25)
- 곽노봉, "소동파의 서예세계" (2005), 다운샘
- 김기주, "北宋 士人畵의 理想", 미술사학보, 29(29), pp.195~226 (2007), 미술사학연구회
- 김상홍, "茶山의 蘇東坡論", 南冥學硏究, (18), pp.281~313 (2004), 경남문화연구원
- 김학주, "중국문학사" (2001), 신아사
- 류종목, "蘇軾과 高麗", 중국문학, 38 (2002), 한국중국어문학회
- 박순철, "蘇軾의 詩畵書 一律相通論 小考", 중국인문과학, (37), pp.327~350 (2007), 중국인문학회
- 배규하, "중국서법예술사" (2000), 이화문화출판사
- 백인산, "조선의 묵죽" (2007), 대원사
- 안영길, "송대회화의 문학화경향과 소동파의 시서화이론", 중국어문학, 11
- 임어당, "소동파평전" (1987), 지식산업사
- 兪劍華, "中國歷代畵論" (2005), 다운샘
- 阮璞, "張彦遠之書畵異同論 in: 畵學叢證" (1998), 上海書畵出版社
- 申採湜, "蘇軾의 高麗觀", 中國學報 (1987)
- 徐居正, "『(국역)사가집』4, 卷14「題菁川畵竹二首」" (2004), 민족문화추진회
- 서복관, "중국예술정신" (1990), 동문선
- 서정아, "사군자 사상의 회화사적 연구", pp.2003
- 蘇軾, "東坡題跋" (1975), 世界書局
- 蘇軾, "校正經進東坡文集事略" (1975), 世界書局
- 蘇軾, "蘇軾文集" (2004), 中華書局
- 李奎報, "국역동국이상국집" (1979), 민족문화추진위원회
- 정선모, "蘇軾文學初期受容樣相考", 동방한문학, 36 (2008), 동방한문학회
- 조규백, "고려시대 문인의 蘇東坡 詩文 受容 및 그 意義(1)", 퇴계학과 한국문화, (39), pp.329~362 (2006), 퇴계연구소
- 조규백, "고려시대 문인의 蘇東坡 詩文 受容 및 그 意義(2)", 퇴계학과 한국문화, (40), pp.183~214 (2007), 퇴계연구소
- 황정숙, "소식의 시론과 서론 비교", 석사, pp.1991
- 허권수, "소동파 시문의 한국적 수용", 중국어문학, 14 (1998), 영남중국어문학회
