본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

蘇軾의 書藝詩를 통해 본 書藝觀

A Study on The Calligraphy Aesthetic View through The Poems on Calligraphy of Su Shi

1

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

Among the poems of Su Shi who excelled in both poetry and calligraphy, 58 poems on 47 topics which had expressed views on previous calligraphers and calligraphy works were selected as poems on calligraphy, and Su Shi's aesthetic view of calligraphy was analyzed in this paper. Su Shi regarded Wang Xizhi as the exemplar of calligraphers and the Preface of the Orchid Pavilion Poetry Anthology as the exemplar of calligraphy works. Su Shi selected Yan Zhenqing and Liu Gongquan in the Tang Dynasty as the best calligrapher. In contrast, by undervaluing Huai Su and Zhang Xu considerably, Su Shi expressed his distinct view of calligraphy different from the contemporary general perception. Su Shi expressed his own aesthetic view of calligraphy different from that of the Tang Dynasty. Since he perceived calligraphy as the externalization of the knowledge and talent of a calligrapher, he placed emphasis on the self and put weight on handwriting of its own free will regardless of specific handwriting styles, and also placed emphasis on writing points and strokes freely without sticking to certain styles in handwriting. In calligraphy, he objected to valuing only grueling efforts and artificial elaboration, but instead, set a high value on naturalness.

Abstract

Among the poems of Su Shi who excelled in both poetry and calligraphy, 58 poems on 47 topics which had expressed views on previous calligraphers and calligraphy works were selected as poems on calligraphy, and Su Shi's aesthetic view of calligraphy was analyzed in this paper. Su Shi regarded Wang Xizhi as the exemplar of calligraphers and the Preface of the Orchid Pavilion Poetry Anthology as the exemplar of calligraphy works. Su Shi selected Yan Zhenqing and Liu Gongquan in the Tang Dynasty as the best calligrapher. In contrast, by undervaluing Huai Su and Zhang Xu considerably, Su Shi expressed his distinct view of calligraphy different from the contemporary general perception. Su Shi expressed his own aesthetic view of calligraphy different from that of the Tang Dynasty. Since he perceived calligraphy as the externalization of the knowledge and talent of a calligrapher, he placed emphasis on the self and put weight on handwriting of its own free will regardless of specific handwriting styles, and also placed emphasis on writing points and strokes freely without sticking to certain styles in handwriting. In calligraphy, he objected to valuing only grueling efforts and artificial elaboration, but instead, set a high value on naturalness.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. 蔡顯良, "宋四家論書詩槪說", 中國書法, (8) (2004)
  2. 蔡顯良, "宋代論書詩硏究", 博士, pp.2007
  3. 蔡顯良, "唐代論書詩硏究", 碩士, pp.2004
  4. 陳思, "四庫藝術叢書" (1991), 上海古籍出版社
  5. "文淵閣四庫全書" (2007), 上海古籍出版社
  6. 方愛龍, "杜甫李潮八分小篆歌闡論兼與蘇軾詩比較", 浙江廣播電視高等專科學校學報, (5) (1995)
  7. 何文煥, "歷代詩話 (上・下)" (2004), 中華書局
  8. 李敖, "周越墨跡研究-你不知道的故宮博物院" (1997), 桂冠圖書
  9. 李福順, "蘇軾與書畵文獻集" (2008), 榮寶齋出版社
  10. 凌麗萍, "宋代論書詩硏究", 碩士, pp.2007
  11. 류종목, "완역蘇軾詩集Ⅰ" (2005), 서울대학교출판부
  12. 仇兆鰲, "杜詩詳註" (1984), 漢京文化事業有限公司
  13. "全宋詩" (1998), 北京大學出版社
  14. 蘇軾, "蘇東坡全集" (1964), 臺灣世界書局
  15. 蘇軾, "中國古典文學基本叢書" (1992), 北京中華書局
  16. 蘇軾, "中國古典文學基本叢書" (1989), 北京中華書局
  17. 蘇轍, "中國古典文學基本叢書" (1990), 北京中華書局
  18. 孫民, "蘇軾詩中的書道觀-解讀蘇軾三首論書詩", 樂山師範學院學報, (6) (2004)
  19. 屠友祥, "山谷題跋校注" (2011), 上海遠東出版社
  20. 王友勝, "蘇詩硏究史稿" (2010), 中華書局
  21. 우재호, "黃庭堅의 書藝詩 硏究", 중국어문학, (69), pp.59~83 (2015), 영남중국어문학회
  22. 우재호, "梅堯臣 書藝詩의 特徵", 중국어문학, (55), pp.175~206 (2010), 영남중국어문학회[DOI]
  23. 우재호, "唐代 書藝詩 試探", 중어중문학, (43), pp.145~174 (2008), 한국중어중문학회
  24. 禹在鎬, "中國歷代 詠書詩 譯註(5-8): 宋代1-4", 中國語文學譯叢, 30-33 (2009)
  25. 楊克炎, "書法咏論" (1993), 遼寧美術出版社
  26. 趙龍濤, "蘇軾論書詩簡論", 書畫藝術學刊, (9) (2010)
  27. 周本淳, "杜甫與蘇軾論書詩之比較", 淮陰師專學報, (2) (1988)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)