본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

북한의 2013 교육과정 개정 전·후 고등학교 영어교과서 비교분석

A comparison of high school English textbooks between pre- and post-2013 Revised Curriculum in North Korea.

1

조회

0

다운로드

10

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This paper aims to investigate the recent changes in English education in North Korea and compare the differences in pre- and post-2013 Revised Curricula in high school English textbooks. To this end, three post-2013 Revised Curriculum high school textbooks are compared with three pre-2013 Revised Curriculum textbooks. By using contents analysis, particularly relying on Coh-Metrix, these textbooks are compared considering three categories: physical characteristics and chapter/content organizations, topics, and readability in each school year. First, along with listening materials, a renewed emphasis on English verbal communication was found in the revised textbooks. Second, revised textbooks included more practical topics such as science, technology, and everyday life, whereas pre-revision textbooks comprised of more communist ideology, idolizing the Kim family, and promoting patriotism. Third, in terms of readability of textbooks, the analysis of Coh-Metrix revealed that the burden of learners increased due to the exponentially increased volume of new vocabulary textbooks. However, in the case of pre-2013 textbooks, the difficulty level of reading sections in each year fluctuated, whereas that of the post-2013 textbooks presents a steady increase as students advance in their school grade.

Abstract

This paper aims to investigate the recent changes in English education in North Korea and compare the differences in pre- and post-2013 Revised Curricula in high school English textbooks. To this end, three post-2013 Revised Curriculum high school textbooks are compared with three pre-2013 Revised Curriculum textbooks. By using contents analysis, particularly relying on Coh-Metrix, these textbooks are compared considering three categories: physical characteristics and chapter/content organizations, topics, and readability in each school year. First, along with listening materials, a renewed emphasis on English verbal communication was found in the revised textbooks. Second, revised textbooks included more practical topics such as science, technology, and everyday life, whereas pre-revision textbooks comprised of more communist ideology, idolizing the Kim family, and promoting patriotism. Third, in terms of readability of textbooks, the analysis of Coh-Metrix revealed that the burden of learners increased due to the exponentially increased volume of new vocabulary textbooks. However, in the case of pre-2013 textbooks, the difficulty level of reading sections in each year fluctuated, whereas that of the post-2013 textbooks presents a steady increase as students advance in their school grade.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. 안수진, "한국인 대학생과 영어 원어민 대학생의 영어 설명문, 논설문의 코메트릭스 분석을 통한 비교", 새한영어영문학, 60(3), pp.177~205 (2018), 새한영어영문학회[DOI]
  2. 배지영, "중학교 1·2학년 2015 개정 영어교과서 읽기 자료의 가독성 분석과 아동문학 선정 연구", 영어교과교육, 18(2), pp.117~141 (2019), 한국영어교과교육학회[DOI]
  3. Cho, Han-Bum, "From Hanoi to Panmunjeom : Assessment and prospects for DPRK-U. S. denuclearization negotiations", Korea Institute for National Unification, 19(12), pp.1~9 (2019)
  4. 조정아, "김정은시대 북한 교육정책 방향과 중등교육과정 개편", 통일정책연구, 23(2), pp.177~206 (2014), 통일연구원
  5. Education policy, education curriculum, and textbooks in the Kim Jong-un era, "Cho, Jeong-Ah", Korea Institute for National Unification, ~ (2015)
  6. Flesch, R., "A new readability yardstick", Journal of Applied Psychology, 32, pp.221~233 (1948)
  7. 홍정실, "북한 영어교과서의 통치 권력별 통시적 분석", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 19(6), pp.599~619 (2019), 학습자중심교과교육학회[DOI]
  8. 황서연, "북한 제1중학교 영어교과서 분석", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 17(11), pp.242~251 (2017), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
  9. 전문기, "Coh-Metrix를 이용한 중학교 1학년과 2학년 개정 영어교과서 읽기 자료의 코퍼스 언어학적 연계성 분석", 언어과학연구, (56), pp.201~218 (2011), 언어과학회
  10. 정채관, "남북한 공통 영어과 교육과정 개발 연구", 외국어교육연구, 32(4), pp.47~82 (2018), 외국어교육연구소[DOI]
  11. Kim, Eun-Ju, "An analysis of English textbooks and English teaching methods in South and North Korea", English Teaching, 54(4), pp.177~198 (1999)
  12. "North Korea", 1995, 178~187
  13. 김정렬, "북한 영어 교과서 특성 파악을 위한 코퍼스 구축", 영어영문학, 22(2), pp.207~232 (2017), 미래영어영문학회
  14. 김지영, "북한 영어 교과서 어휘의 통시적 분석", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 17(4), pp.331~341 (2017), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
  15. Kincaid, J. P., "Derivation of new readability formulas for Navy enlisted personnel" (1975), Naval Technical Training
  16. Unification policy studies, "Korea Institute for National Unification", Korea Institute for National Unification, ~ (2014)
  17. 이병민, "북한 영어교육의 실상", Foreign Languages Education, 12(4), pp.267~297 (2005), 한국외국어교육학회
  18. Ministry of Unification, "Understanding of North Korea" (2019), Ministry of Unification
  19. 박은성, "Goals and Contents of English Language Teaching in North Korea: Insights From High School Textbooks", 현대영어교육, 17(2), pp.91~109 (2016), 현대영어교육학회
  20. Park, Yak-Woo, (2001), Hankook munhwasa
  21. Shin, Gi-Wook, "North Korea in 2018 : Kim’s summit diplomacy", Asian Survey, 59(1), pp.35~43 (2019)
  22. 성일호, "이독성공식과 Coh-Metrix를 활용한우리나라 고등학교 영어교과서 이독성 분석", 영어영문학연구, 40(4), pp.299~320 (2014), 대한영어영문학회[DOI]
  23. 유희연, "북한의 2013교육과정 개정 전·후 영어 교과서 구성 체제 비교", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 18(7), pp.412~422 (2018), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)