본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

2015 개정 영어과 선택 중심 교육과정 개선 방안 탐색

A study on improving the 2015 Revised National English Elective- centered Curriculum

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This study aims to explore ways to improve the elective-centered curriculum in the 2015 Revised National English Curriculum. To do so, first, the study analyzed the appropriateness of electives in terms of differentiation. Newly introduced in the curriculum, career-related electives were not clearly defined regarding topic, achievement standards, and level. Second, to investigate the current status of course completion, the study analyzed the number of elective courses which were mainly selected and identified which courses were highly utilized and its reasons. The results showed that out of the eight elective courses offered by the curriculum, general electives were mainly selected at schools. It was also found that career-related electives were not differentiated clearly enough, which caused difficulties in teaching and evaluation. Finally, considering the purpose of the high school credit system, which strengthens students’ rights to choose subjects according to their career paths, level, and interests, it would be necessary to secure the differentiation of subjects and to systematize course completion to establish clear guidelines for course selection.

Abstract

This study aims to explore ways to improve the elective-centered curriculum in the 2015 Revised National English Curriculum. To do so, first, the study analyzed the appropriateness of electives in terms of differentiation. Newly introduced in the curriculum, career-related electives were not clearly defined regarding topic, achievement standards, and level. Second, to investigate the current status of course completion, the study analyzed the number of elective courses which were mainly selected and identified which courses were highly utilized and its reasons. The results showed that out of the eight elective courses offered by the curriculum, general electives were mainly selected at schools. It was also found that career-related electives were not differentiated clearly enough, which caused difficulties in teaching and evaluation. Finally, considering the purpose of the high school credit system, which strengthens students’ rights to choose subjects according to their career paths, level, and interests, it would be necessary to secure the differentiation of subjects and to systematize course completion to establish clear guidelines for course selection.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. 배지영, "2015 개정 교육과정이 적용된 초·중등 영어교과서의 읽기 지문 연계성 분석", 현대영어영문학, 63(2), pp.81~107 (2019), 한국현대영어영문학회[DOI]
  2. Survey on the organization and operation of elective courses according to the 2015 Revised Curriculum, "Cho, Sangsik", Ministry of Education, ~ (2018)
  3. 최희경, "2015 개정 교육과정 기반 초등영어 교과서의 파닉스 내용과 지도 방법 분석", 초등영어교육, 26(3), pp.55~79 (2020), 한국초등영어교육학회[DOI]
  4. 황은경, "2015 개정 교육과정에 따른 초등 5학년과 6학년 영어교과서 읽기 지문의 이독성 지수 비교분석", Foreign Languages Education, 26(3), pp.99~119 (2019), 한국외국어교육학회[DOI]
  5. 임소혜, "2015 개정 교육과정에 따른 초등 5, 6학년영어 교과서 문화 내용 분석", 한국초등교육, 31(3), pp.181~195 (2020), 초등교육연구원[DOI]
  6. 정은숙, "초등학교 5, 6학년 영어 교과서의 읽기 자료에 나타난 문화 연계 실태 및 문화 내용 분석", 초등영어교육, 26(4), pp.29~50 (2020), 한국초등영어교육학회[DOI]
  7. 김인옥, "2015 개정 교육과정 기반 초등 3, 4학년 영어교과서 쓰기 활동 분석", 영어영문학연구, 60(3), pp.339~359 (2018), 한국중앙영어영문학회[DOI]
  8. 김민지, "2015 개정 5~6학년군 초등 영어 교과서의 쓰기 활동 분석", 초등영어교육, 26(3), pp.5~28 (2020), 한국초등영어교육학회[DOI]
  9. 김성혜, "2015 개정 영어과 교육과정의 변화 분석", 현대영어교육, 18(3), pp.91~111 (2017), 현대영어교육학회
  10. 김성혜, "2015 개정 초·중학교 영어과 교육과정의 내용 적정성에 대한 교사 인식", 영어교육, 75(2), pp.93~110 (2020), 한국영어교육학회
  11. 김영숙, "2015 개정 초등영어 교육과정 내용체계표 분석", 초등영어교육, 24(4), pp.31~51 (2018), 한국초등영어교육학회[DOI]
  12. "study on English curriculum improvement" (2005)[URL]
  13. "The commentary for 2015 Revised National Curriculum:Middle and high school"[URL]
  14. "A study on the development of the 2015 Revised Curriculum high school teaching and learning materials:English-speaking culture and English literature reading" (2017)[URL]
  15. "Developing the assessment standards of the high school career-related selective subjects" (2018)[URL]
  16. 이혜경, "2015 개정 교육과정에 근거한 초등학교 5학년 영어교과서 문화 분석 -인종, 성, 다문화 요소를 중심으로-", 예술인문사회 융합 멀티미디어 논문지, 9(12), pp.245~253 (2019), 사단법인 인문사회과학기술융합학회[DOI]
  17. 이지웅, "Coh-Metrix를 이용한 2015개정 6학년 영어 교과서 비교 분석", 초등영어교육, 26(4), pp.137~157 (2020), 한국초등영어교육학회[DOI]
  18. 이소영, "2015 개정 영어과 교육과정의 변화 및 쟁점: 공통 교육과정을 중심으로", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 16(7), pp.499~519 (2016), 학습자중심교과교육학회
  19. "2015 Revised National Curriculum" (2015)[URL]
  20. (2015)[URL]
  21. "Directive amendment of student assessment based on the 2015 Revised National Curriculum" (2018)[URL]
  22. "Elementary and secondary school curriculum, partial amendment (No. 2019-211)"[URL]
  23. "Elementary and secondary school curriculum, partial amendment (No. 2020-225)" (2020)[URL]
  24. "Discussions with the public on the 2022 Revised National Curriculum" (2021)[URL]
  25. 문미정, "2015 개정 교육과정에 따른 초등 3~4학년 영어 교과서 파닉스 분석", 교사교육연구, 58(4), pp.471~482 (2019), 과학교육연구소[DOI]
  26. 윤여범, "2015 개정 교육과정에 따른 초등영어 교과서의 파닉스 분석", 영어교과교육, 18(1), pp.99~116 (2019), 한국영어교과교육학회[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)