본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

An Analysis of the Readability of English Translation on Major City Governments' Wesites in Korea

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The objective of this study was to assess the readability and vocabulary size of the translated texts on the English websites of Seoul and five metropolitan city governments. This study evaluated the translated texts taken from the six cities with the use of four readability formulas including Flesch Reading Ease, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, SMOG, and Dale-Schall for measuring readability and RANGE for analyzing vocabulary size of the sampled texts. The readability measurement showed that the translation of the history sections of these six cities was too difficult for virtually all readers to comprehend the contents. The vocabulary size analysis yielded that around 80% of the words in the texts were covered by 3,000 word families, quite lower than 95% lexical coverage for adequate comprehension of a text, which can be interpreted as saying that the vocabulary demands are high for such public sectors' informational texts. The findings demonstrate that readability levels and vocabulary size of the sampled texts should be adjusted to help foreigners have a more comfortable and adequate understanding of the translated contents.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the readability and vocabulary size of the translated texts on the English websites of Seoul and five metropolitan city governments. This study evaluated the translated texts taken from the six cities with the use of four readability formulas including Flesch Reading Ease, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, SMOG, and Dale-Schall for measuring readability and RANGE for analyzing vocabulary size of the sampled texts. The readability measurement showed that the translation of the history sections of these six cities was too difficult for virtually all readers to comprehend the contents. The vocabulary size analysis yielded that around 80% of the words in the texts were covered by 3,000 word families, quite lower than 95% lexical coverage for adequate comprehension of a text, which can be interpreted as saying that the vocabulary demands are high for such public sectors' informational texts. The findings demonstrate that readability levels and vocabulary size of the sampled texts should be adjusted to help foreigners have a more comfortable and adequate understanding of the translated contents.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. Anagnostou, N, "From corpus-based collocation frequencies to readability measure", ICT in the analysis, teaching and learning of languages (ICTATLL Workshop), pp.33~46 (2006)
  2. Anderson, R. C, "Vocabulary and knowledge, In Comprehension and teaching: Research review", pp.77~117 (1981), International Reading Association
  3. Blanck, A, "Patient education materials from the layperson's perspective: the importance of readability", Journal for Nurses in Staff Development, 27(2), pp.8~11 (2011)[DOI]
  4. Brown, J. D, "An EFL readability index", JALT Journal, 29, pp.7~36 (1998)
  5. Cha, Kyoung-Hwan, "Measurement of English textbooks", The Journal of The Research Institute of Korean Education, 11, pp.149~168 (1996)
  6. Chall, J, "The beginning years, In Readability: Its past, present and future", pp.2~13 (1988), International Reading Association
  7. Cho, Suk Joo, "Textbook readability: What it should be", English Teaching, 29(30), pp.93~114 (1985)
  8. Coady, J, "High frequency vocabulary and reading proficiency in ESL readers, In Second language reading and vocabulary learning", pp.217~228 (1993), Ablex
  9. "The plain English movement" (1987)[URL]
  10. Dubay, W, "The principles of readability" (2004), Impact Information
  11. Elliot, J, "A health literacy assessment of the national epilepsy foundation web site", Epilepsy & Behavior, 11(4), pp.525~532 (2007)
  12. "Parents' rights in special education: The readability of procedural safeguards" (2006)[URL]
  13. Gilliland, J, "Readability" (1972), Hodder and Stoughton
  14. Greenfield, G, "The Miyazaki EFL readability index", Comparative Culture, 9, pp.41~49 (2003), Miyazaki International College
  15. Greenfield, G, "Readability formulas for EFL", JALT Journal, 26(1), pp.5~24 (2004)
  16. Hirsh, D, "What vocabulary size is needed to read unsimplified texts for pleasure?", Reading in a Foreign Language, 8, pp.689~696 (1992)
  17. Hu, M, "Unknown vocabulary density and reading comprehension", Reading in a Foreign Language, 13, pp.403~430 (2000)
  18. Hwang, Kyongho, "Where would general service vocabulary stop and special purposes vocabulary begin?", System, 23, pp.35~41 (1995)
  19. Imber, S, "The Miranda warning: Readability and the rights of children with disabilities 2001", Forensic Psychology Monographs (2001)
  20. 전문기, "코메트릭스(Coh-Metrix)를 이용한 중학교 1학년 개정 영어 교과서의 코퍼스 언어학적 비교 분석", 영어교육연구, 21(4), pp.265~292 (2009), 팬코리아영어교육학회
  21. 전문기, "고등학교 영어 교과서 읽기 자료의 코퍼스 언어학적 비교 분석", Foreign Languages Education, 17(1), pp.209~233 (2010), 한국외국어교육학회
  22. 김정렬, "초등학생용 영어도서 선정을 위한 한국형 Lexile 개발", 영어교육연구, 22(2), pp.227~254 (2010), 팬코리아영어교육학회
  23. King, M, "Assessing the readability of mental health internet brochures for children and adolescents", Journal of Child and Family Studies, 12(1), pp.91~99 (2003)
  24. Koda, K, "The effects of transferred vocabulary knowledge on the development of L2 reading proficiency", Foreign Language Annals, 22, pp.529~540 (1989)
  25. Laufer, B, "How much lexis is necessary for reading comprehension?, In Vocabulary and applied linguistics", pp.126~132 (1991), Macmillan
  26. Laufer, B, "Reading in a foreign language: How does L2 lexical knowledge interact with the reader's general academic ability?", Journal of Research in Reading, 15, pp.95~103 (1992)
  27. Laufer, B, "The lexical plight in second language reading: Words you don't know, words you think you know, and words you can't guess, In Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy", pp.20~34 (1997), Cambridge University Press
  28. McLaughlin, G, "SMOG grading: A new readability formula", Journal of Reading, 22, pp.639~646 (1969)
  29. "Range" (2005)[URL]
  30. Nation, I. S. P, "How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and speaking?", Canadian Modern Language Re, 63, pp.59~82 (2006)
  31. Ozasa, T, "Development of a readability indexfor Japanese learners of EFL (1): An interim report", ICT in the analysis, teaching and learning of languages (ICTATLL Workshop), pp.29~35 (2007)
  32. Ozasa, T, "Measuring readability for Japanese learners of English", Proceedings of the 12th Conference of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, pp.122~125 (2007)
  33. Ozasa, T, "Toward a readability index for Japanese learners of EFL", Proceedings of the 13th Conference of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, pp.59~62 (2008)
  34. 박명수, "Korean University Students’ Listening Comprehension in American and British Englishes", 영어교육, 64(1), pp.79~93 (2009), 한국영어교육학회
  35. 신지선, "공공기관 번역현황 설문조사 결과 및 분석", 번역학연구, 8(2), pp.75~103 (2007), 한국번역학회
  36. Svartvik, J, "English; One tongue, many voices" (2006), Palgrave Macmillan
  37. Vermeer, H, "Skopos and commission in translational action, In Readings in translation theory", pp.173~187 (1989), Oy Finn Lectura Ab
  38. Zakaluk, B. L, "Readability: Its past, present and future" (1988), International Reading Association

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)