본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

曹魏, 西晉時期 幷州 匈奴社會 - 五胡十六國의 前奏曲 -

Bing-Zhou Xiongnu in Cao-Wei and Xi-Jin Dynasty

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

In AD 47, Southern Xiongnu(南匈奴) that was formed centering on the group that moved south around the Great Wall of China lived separately after the division of Xiongnu and served as the defender of Han(漢) Dynasty. After that, Xianbi(鮮卑) tribe became powerful after the collapse of Northern Xiongnu(北匈奴) in AD 91, so many groups of Xiongnu from Mongol steppe migrated to the northern area of Great Wall of China. Due to that reason, the area of Great Wall of China was in confusion due to conflicts between various ethnic groups but it was increasingly stabilized. Southern Xiongnu, which was developed by Han Dynasty’s support and formed its power, gave rise to an internal conflict again in the late 2nd century, so key forces including Shanyu(單于) group mostly migrated to counties by centering on He-Dong(河東) province while other groups moved several provinces by centering on Bing-Zhou(幷州) province. In addition, chaotic states such as Bandits of Yellow flag(Huang-jin-Zei, 黃巾賊)’s uprising in the 180s and northern immigrants who moved south were made so that Southern Xiongnu caused inner divisions again and the key force group expelled from their stronghold held their own ground by uniting with Yuan-Shao(袁紹), but finally was controlled by Cao-Cao(曹操) who took the northern part. After that, Xiongnu failed to form the big power and was under the control of Bing-Zhou and He-Dong province. Later, Xiongnu lived in Bing-Zhou province in better environment than the edge of north by farming instead of Chinese people who moved south in the Later Han Dynasty. Cao-Cao, a person in power, firstly separated Shanyu from their own tribe and weakened power and at the same time divided groups to live separately. The control of each group was given to the own heads, so Xiongnu who lived in Bing-Zhou province was divided but many town heads were internally developed on behalf of Shanyu’s power. Like this, Cao-Cao’s controlling of Xiongnu aimed to stabilize them that was the mounted army with excellent military ability during the situation of unification war and to smoothly mobilize it. When clan of Si-Ma came to power in the late Cao-Wei Dynasty, Liu-Bao(劉豹), a chief of Xiongnu group, increased power and tried to unify Bing-Zhou Xiongnu groups. With such a movement, Si-Ma-Yan(司馬炎) unified the three nations and Argument of barbarian's emigration(徙戎論) was strongly recommended to solve threat of immigrants, but Si-Ma-Yan(Wu-ti, 武帝) didn’t accept it. Si-Ma-Yan rather repressed the uprising of Liu-Bao, divided Bing-Zhou Xiongnu groups into five, and tried to separate the power by making Du-Wei(都尉), the Chinese official position for control. Besides, Si-Ma-Yan captured former Shanyu’s descendant, Liu-Yuan(劉淵), in Luo-Yang(洛陽) to prevent his stronger power. This was a realistic method of preventing the unity of Xiongnu while might strongly control them. However, such a countermeasure of the Royal Court was not successful as the reign of Xi-Jin(西晉) collapsed without time enough to change the power relationship inside the Xiongnu groups. On the other hand, Liu-Yuan took the chance and returned to Shan-Xi(山西) so it founded the new country in central districts on the basis of Xiongnu's own tribe organization system. As a result, so-called Wu-Hu-Shi-Liu(五胡十六國) era has begun.

Abstract

In AD 47, Southern Xiongnu(南匈奴) that was formed centering on the group that moved south around the Great Wall of China lived separately after the division of Xiongnu and served as the defender of Han(漢) Dynasty. After that, Xianbi(鮮卑) tribe became powerful after the collapse of Northern Xiongnu(北匈奴) in AD 91, so many groups of Xiongnu from Mongol steppe migrated to the northern area of Great Wall of China. Due to that reason, the area of Great Wall of China was in confusion due to conflicts between various ethnic groups but it was increasingly stabilized. Southern Xiongnu, which was developed by Han Dynasty’s support and formed its power, gave rise to an internal conflict again in the late 2nd century, so key forces including Shanyu(單于) group mostly migrated to counties by centering on He-Dong(河東) province while other groups moved several provinces by centering on Bing-Zhou(幷州) province. In addition, chaotic states such as Bandits of Yellow flag(Huang-jin-Zei, 黃巾賊)’s uprising in the 180s and northern immigrants who moved south were made so that Southern Xiongnu caused inner divisions again and the key force group expelled from their stronghold held their own ground by uniting with Yuan-Shao(袁紹), but finally was controlled by Cao-Cao(曹操) who took the northern part. After that, Xiongnu failed to form the big power and was under the control of Bing-Zhou and He-Dong province. Later, Xiongnu lived in Bing-Zhou province in better environment than the edge of north by farming instead of Chinese people who moved south in the Later Han Dynasty. Cao-Cao, a person in power, firstly separated Shanyu from their own tribe and weakened power and at the same time divided groups to live separately. The control of each group was given to the own heads, so Xiongnu who lived in Bing-Zhou province was divided but many town heads were internally developed on behalf of Shanyu’s power. Like this, Cao-Cao’s controlling of Xiongnu aimed to stabilize them that was the mounted army with excellent military ability during the situation of unification war and to smoothly mobilize it. When clan of Si-Ma came to power in the late Cao-Wei Dynasty, Liu-Bao(劉豹), a chief of Xiongnu group, increased power and tried to unify Bing-Zhou Xiongnu groups. With such a movement, Si-Ma-Yan(司馬炎) unified the three nations and Argument of barbarian's emigration(徙戎論) was strongly recommended to solve threat of immigrants, but Si-Ma-Yan(Wu-ti, 武帝) didn’t accept it. Si-Ma-Yan rather repressed the uprising of Liu-Bao, divided Bing-Zhou Xiongnu groups into five, and tried to separate the power by making Du-Wei(都尉), the Chinese official position for control. Besides, Si-Ma-Yan captured former Shanyu’s descendant, Liu-Yuan(劉淵), in Luo-Yang(洛陽) to prevent his stronger power. This was a realistic method of preventing the unity of Xiongnu while might strongly control them. However, such a countermeasure of the Royal Court was not successful as the reign of Xi-Jin(西晉) collapsed without time enough to change the power relationship inside the Xiongnu groups. On the other hand, Liu-Yuan took the chance and returned to Shan-Xi(山西) so it founded the new country in central districts on the basis of Xiongnu's own tribe organization system. As a result, so-called Wu-Hu-Shi-Liu(五胡十六國) era has begun.

참고문헌 (44)

  1. "中華書局 標點校勘本", 史記, ~
  2. "中華書局 標點校勘本", 三國志, ~
  3. "續修四庫全書本", 十六國春秋, ~
  4. "中華書局 標點校勘本", 魏書, ~
  5. "中華書局 標點校勘本", 資治通鑑, ~
  6. "中華書局 標點校勘本", 晉書, ~
  7. "文淵閣 四庫全書本", 漢魏六朝百三家集, ~
  8. "中華書局 標點校勘本", 後漢書, ~
  9. 金翰奎, "天下國家 - 전통시대 동아시아 세계 질서" (2005), 소나무
  10. 朴漢濟, "中國中世胡漢體制硏究" (1988), 一潮閣
  11. 사와다 이사오, "匈奴 : 지금은 사라진 고대 유목국가 이야기" (2007), 아이필드
  12. 黎風, "山西古代經濟史" (1997), 山西經濟出版社
  13. 馬長壽, "北狄與匈奴" (1962), 三聯書店
  14. 安介生, "山西移民史" (1999), 山西人民出版社
  15. 王仲犖, "魏晉南北朝史" (1981), 上海人民出版社
  16. 汪波, "魏晉北朝幷州地區硏究" (2001), 人民出版社
  17. 姚薇元, "北朝胡姓考" (1962), 中華書局
  18. 林幹, "東胡史" (2007), 內蒙古人民出版社
  19. 林幹, "匈奴史" (2007), 內蒙古人民出版社
  20. 周偉洲, "漢趙國史" (2006), 廣西師範大學出版社
  21. 黃烈, "中國古代民族史硏究" (1987), 人民出版社
  22. 谷川道雄, "隋唐帝國形成史論" (1971), 筑摩書房
  23. 罔崎文夫, "魏晋南北朝通史" (1932), 弘文堂
  24. 三崎良章, "五胡十六國 - 中國史上의 民族 大移動" (2007), 景仁文化社
  25. 森安孝夫, "シルクロードと唐帝國" (2007), 講談社
  26. 田村實造, "中國史上の民族移動期" (1985), 創文社
  27. 後藤富男, "內陸アジア遊牧民族社會の硏究" (1968), 吉川弘文館
  28. 渠傳福, "晉陽與 “幷州胡”" (2008), 中國文化遺産
  29. 唐長孺, "魏晉雜胡考 in:魏晉隋唐史論叢" (1978), 三聯出版社
  30. 唐長孺, "晉代北境各族「變亂」的性質及五胡政權在中國的統治 in:魏晉南北朝史論叢" (1978), 三聯出版社
  31. 唐長孺, "晉代北境內各族“變亂”的性質及五胡政權在中國的統治 in:魏晉南北朝史論叢" (2002), 河北敎育出版社
  32. 羅君, "漢晉中央政府對南匈奴的管理及其影響" (2004), 綿陽師範學院學報
  33. 宋秀英, "劉淵政權的出現與北疆民族主動認同 中國 的開始—中國古代疆域形成理論探討之二" (2005), 中國邊疆史地硏究
  34. 吳洪琳, "鐵弗匈奴對朔方地區的經營開發" (2008), 寧夏大學學報
  35. 吳洪琳, "鐵弗匈奴的形成及早期歷史" (2007), 西北民族論叢
  36. 陳琳國, "東漢末年南匈奴南遷的前後" (2008), 晉陽學刊
  37. 陳勇, "史記 所見 胡 與 匈奴 稱謂考" (2005), 民族硏究
  38. 馮世明, "論東漢南匈奴的兵民合一 - 就南匈奴 勝兵 問題與林幹先生商榷" (2009), 蘭州學刊
  39. 胡祥琴, "十六國時期的政治感生神話與民族融合" (2007), 西北第二民族學院學報(哲社版)
  40. 胡祥琴, "劉淵感生神話的歷史形成" (2006), 民族硏究
  41. 胡祥琴, "政治神話與十六國時期的匈奴漢趙政權" (2008), 西北第二民族學院學報(哲社版)
  42. 黃烈, "五胡漢化與五胡政權的關係" (1963), 歷史硏究
  43. 內田吟風, "南匈奴に關する硏究 in:北アジア史硏究 - 匈奴編" (1975), 同朋舍
  44. 町田隆吉, "2ㆍ3世紀の南匈奴について- 晋書 巻101劉元海載記解釈試論", 社会文化史学, 17 (1979)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)