14세기 高昌 위구르 후예의 과거 기억 복원 ―《亦都護高昌王世勳碑》의 시조 신화 재검토 ―
Restoration on the past memory of Qocho Uyghur descendants in the 14th century - Reexamination on the progenitor’s myth remaining in the 《Epitaph of Ïduq qut Gaochang King》-
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Ïduq qut Gaochang king, one of the Qocho Uyghur descendants leaving the 《Epitaph of Ïduq qut Gaochang King》 in the 14th century, is the descendant of Bugu Jun(僕固俊) that set up the government, so-called Qocho Uyghur, in Turfan after 866. Even under the ruling of Mongolian Empire in the 14th century, he want to succeeded to Qocho Uyghur’s tradition. Bugu(僕固) tribe that he belonged to was one of the Turkish tribes that led a nomadic life in the past Mongolia. They not only grew during the ruling of Tang after the collapse of the Empire of Turks in the middle of 7th century, but were one of the powerful parties also in the period of Uyghur’s nomadic khaghanate(745~840). And they have long-lasting history setting up the government only after the mid-9th century and maintaining it for over 300 years. Ïduq qut Gaochang king remembered and wrote down this past historical experience as name of the myth of ‘Bögü qaghan’, the progenitor. This memory of his was not only related with Uyghur lived in the Mongolia that had close ties with himself among the historical issues that the past Turks made, but was associated with the effort to connect the legitimacy of Turkish nomads started from Gaocha (高車) in the 5th century with himself. Therefore, in order to systematize his own historical consciousness, Ïduq qut Gaochang king completed the myth about ‘Bögü qaghan’ mobilizing and synthesizing various motives. In that place, first, he emphasized the Tuul River of Mongolian steppe related to the mainland of Bugu tribe, and also borrowed the faith of a divine mountain(聖山) along with the joint of the two rivers(兩河). And he put emphasis on the divinity of the progenitor through the combination of divine trees(神樹) and sunlight(日光) that may have been related with the ultimate religious system of the steppe as well as the doctrine of Manichaeism. Moreover, explaining the existence of five sons from divine trees(木生五子) and his youngest sibling, Bögü qaghan, he tried to show their ties as a party in the past. This process was meant to identify the past traditions by combining the mythological motives of the steppe in northern Asia including the past Turks. And at the same time, it was also the process to justify the Bugu tribe that transmitted the legitimacy in the history. Therefore, Ïduq qut Gaochang king could make the tradition of ‘Uyghur’ of his own through the arrangement of the progenitor’s myth, and later, this created another historical substance of ‘Uyghur’.
Abstract
Ïduq qut Gaochang king, one of the Qocho Uyghur descendants leaving the 《Epitaph of Ïduq qut Gaochang King》 in the 14th century, is the descendant of Bugu Jun(僕固俊) that set up the government, so-called Qocho Uyghur, in Turfan after 866. Even under the ruling of Mongolian Empire in the 14th century, he want to succeeded to Qocho Uyghur’s tradition. Bugu(僕固) tribe that he belonged to was one of the Turkish tribes that led a nomadic life in the past Mongolia. They not only grew during the ruling of Tang after the collapse of the Empire of Turks in the middle of 7th century, but were one of the powerful parties also in the period of Uyghur’s nomadic khaghanate(745~840). And they have long-lasting history setting up the government only after the mid-9th century and maintaining it for over 300 years. Ïduq qut Gaochang king remembered and wrote down this past historical experience as name of the myth of ‘Bögü qaghan’, the progenitor. This memory of his was not only related with Uyghur lived in the Mongolia that had close ties with himself among the historical issues that the past Turks made, but was associated with the effort to connect the legitimacy of Turkish nomads started from Gaocha (高車) in the 5th century with himself. Therefore, in order to systematize his own historical consciousness, Ïduq qut Gaochang king completed the myth about ‘Bögü qaghan’ mobilizing and synthesizing various motives. In that place, first, he emphasized the Tuul River of Mongolian steppe related to the mainland of Bugu tribe, and also borrowed the faith of a divine mountain(聖山) along with the joint of the two rivers(兩河). And he put emphasis on the divinity of the progenitor through the combination of divine trees(神樹) and sunlight(日光) that may have been related with the ultimate religious system of the steppe as well as the doctrine of Manichaeism. Moreover, explaining the existence of five sons from divine trees(木生五子) and his youngest sibling, Bögü qaghan, he tried to show their ties as a party in the past. This process was meant to identify the past traditions by combining the mythological motives of the steppe in northern Asia including the past Turks. And at the same time, it was also the process to justify the Bugu tribe that transmitted the legitimacy in the history. Therefore, Ïduq qut Gaochang king could make the tradition of ‘Uyghur’ of his own through the arrangement of the progenitor’s myth, and later, this created another historical substance of ‘Uyghur’.
참고문헌 (52)
- "三國史記", ~
- "後漢書", ~
- "魏書", ~
- "周書", ~
- "北史", ~
- "舊唐書", ~
- "新唐書", ~
- "元史", ~
- "元文類", ~
- 라시드 앗 딘, "라시드 앗 딘의 집사 2 : 칭기스칸기" (2003), 사계절
- 미르치아 엘리아데, "샤마니즘" (1992), 까치
- 丁載勳, "위구르 遊牧帝國史", pp.744~840 (2005), 문학과 지성사
- Alā al-Dīn Atā Malik Juvaini, "Genghis Khan: The History of the World-Conqueror" (1958), Harvard University Press
- Кляшторный, С. Г., "古代突厥魯尼文碑銘 - 中亞細亞原始文獻" (1991), 黑龍江敎育出版社
- Очир, А., "유목민 미술전 - 특별 전시 도록" (2012), 몽골 국립미술관
- Paul, Pelliot, "Sur la Legende d'Uguz khan en Ecritue Ouioure", T'oung Pao, XXVII (1930)
- 耿世民, "烏古斯可汗的傳說" (1980), 新疆人民出版社
- 段連勤, "丁零, 高車與鐵勒" (1988), 上海人民出版社
- 薛宗正, "突厥史" (1992), 中國社會科學出版社
- 王小甫, "中國中古的族群凝聚" (2012), 中華書局
- 李樹輝, "烏古斯和回鶻硏究" (2010), 民族出版社
- 李鴻賓, "唐朝朔方軍硏究-兼論唐廷與西北諸族的關係及其年邊" (2000), 吉林人民出版社
- 田韋疆, "高昌回鶻史稿" (2006), 新疆人民出版社
- 華濤, "西域歷史硏究 - 八至十世紀" (2000), 上海古籍出版社
- 安部建夫, "西ウイグル國史の硏究" (1958), 東京
- 山田信夫, "北アジア遊牧民族史硏究" (1989), 東京大學出版會
- 김남윤, "베제클릭 38굴 마니교 벽화 연구", 중앙아시아연구, 10, pp.51~70 (2005), 중앙아시아학회
- 정재훈, "突厥 阿史那氏의 原住地 再檢討 ― 阿史那氏의 發生과 移住, 그리고 勢力化 過程 ―", 중앙아시아연구, 16, pp.53~78 (2011), 중앙아시아학회
- 정재훈, "突厥 初期史의 再構成 ― 建國 神話 硏究의 再檢討를 중심으로 ―", 중앙아시아연구, 14, pp.1~31 (2009), 중앙아시아학회
- 丁載勳, "야글라카르 위구르(744~795) 初期 葛勒可汗(747~759)의 世界觀 ― 突厥第二帝國 빌게 카간(716~734)과의 比較를 中心으로―", 中央아시아硏究, 3 (1998)
- 丁載勳, "위구르 初期(744~755) ‘九姓回紇’의 部族 構成 ― ‘토쿠즈 오구즈(Toquz Oγuz)’ 問題의 再檢討 ―", 東洋史學硏究, 68 (1999)
- 정재훈, "위구르 카를륵 카간(747~759)의 季節的 移動과 그 性格", 중앙아시아연구, 11, pp.1~28 (2006), 중앙아시아학회
- 丁載勳, "위구르의 摩尼敎 受容과 그 性格", 歷史學報, 168 (2000)
- "위구르 유목제국 시기(744~840) 비문 해제, 중앙유라시아연구소 2009년도문명아카이브 해제 프로젝트"[URL]
- 耿世民, "回鶻文亦都護高昌王世勳碑硏究", 考古學報, 1980(4) (1980)
- 賈叢江, "元代畏兀兒遷居永昌事輯", 西域硏究, 2002(4) (2002)
- 賈叢江, "元朝前期西域政治史的幾個問題", 喀什師範學院學報, 1999(12) (1999)
- 羅賢佑, "元代畏兀兒亦都護譜系及其地位變遷", 民族硏究, 1997(2) (1997)
- 黨壽山, "亦都護高昌王世勳碑考", 考古與文物, 1983(1) (1983)
- 劉迎勝, "亦都護高昌王世勳碑回鶻文碑文之校勘與研究", 元史及北方民族史研究集刊, 8 (1984)
- 楊富學, "契丹族源傳說借自回鶻論", 歷史硏究, 2002(2) (2002)
- 楊富學, "唐代回鶻僕固部世系考 - 以蒙古國新出僕固氏墓誌銘爲中心", 西域硏究, 2012(1) (2012)
- 王小甫, "契丹建國與回鶻文化", 中國社會科學, 4 (2004)
- 林悟殊, "摩尼的二宗三際論及其起源初探, In 摩尼敎及其東漸" (1987), 中華書局
- 田韋疆, "卜古可汗傳說”史實解析 - 把打開高昌回鶻史研究之門的鑰匙", 民族硏究, 3 (2000)
- 田韋疆, "試論古代回鶻人的“樹木”崇拜", 新疆大學學報, 2 (1994)
- 巴・蘇和, "蒙古族 “九” 數崇拜文化", 中央民族大學學報, 2 (1996)
- 畢樳, "關于突厥語民族的神秘數目", 突厥語言與文化硏究 (1996), 中央民族大學出版社
- 何金蘭, "元《亦都護高昌王世勳碑》瑣談", 河西學院學報, 1 (2012)
- 黃文弼, "亦都護高昌王世勳碑復原幷校記", 文物, 2 (1964)
- 吉田順一, "ハンガイと陰山", 史觀, 102 (1980)
- 護雅夫, "ウチユケンと古代遊牧國家", 內陸アジア硏究, I (1964)
