본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

몽골 초원의 7～8세기 석상 연구 ― 시베트 울란 제사유적을 중심으로 ―

Stone Statuaries of the Turks in the 7th and 8th centuries

박아림
중앙아시아학회 (The Korean Association For The Central Asian Studies)|2019.12|중앙아시아연구 (CENTRAL ASIAN STUDIES)|제24권 제2호|pp. 33-58|DOI 10.29174/cas.2019.24.2.002

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

몽골MongoliaTurks돌궐소그드Sogd석인상장의미술제사유적stone statuaryritual complexfunerary art

초록

The Shiveet Ulaan ritual complex and the stone statuary built at the time of the establishment of the second Turk empire from the second half of the 7th century has a significance as the beginning of the Turk style ritual complex. It has a feature both from the steppe and from China. Some features of the Shiveet Ulaan which are not seen in the ritual complexes of Bilge Khan, and Kul Tegin might show the sign of the natural Turk identity which would be discarded later as adopting the Chinese style sculptures. The sign of some more foreign nature like the lion sculpture might also be related to the Turk steppe identity. The Bayannur Tomb and the Pugu Tomb also dated to the second half of the 7th century are important to consider the characteristics of the Shiveet Ulaan. The Shiveet Ulaan were built at the beginning of the second Turk empire by the Ashina family, and the two tombs were constructed during the Tang ruling period by the Pugu. They represent how the Ashina family and the Pugu tribe have different kind of burial custom and different kind of foreign elements they chose to accept.

Abstract

The Shiveet Ulaan ritual complex and the stone statuary built at the time of the establishment of the second Turk empire from the second half of the 7th century has a significance as the beginning of the Turk style ritual complex. It has a feature both from the steppe and from China. Some features of the Shiveet Ulaan which are not seen in the ritual complexes of Bilge Khan, and Kul Tegin might show the sign of the natural Turk identity which would be discarded later as adopting the Chinese style sculptures. The sign of some more foreign nature like the lion sculpture might also be related to the Turk steppe identity. The Bayannur Tomb and the Pugu Tomb also dated to the second half of the 7th century are important to consider the characteristics of the Shiveet Ulaan. The Shiveet Ulaan were built at the beginning of the second Turk empire by the Ashina family, and the two tombs were constructed during the Tang ruling period by the Pugu. They represent how the Ashina family and the Pugu tribe have different kind of burial custom and different kind of foreign elements they chose to accept.

참고문헌 (49)

  1. "北史", ~
  2. "周書", ~
  3. "隋書", ~
  4. "舊唐書", ~
  5. "新唐書", ~
  6. 데 바이에르, "몽골석인상의 연구" (1994), 혜안
  7. 블라지미르 D. 꾸바레프, "알타이의 제사유적" (1999), 학연문화사
  8. 유향양, "중국 당대 황제릉 연구" (2012), 서경문화사
  9. 정재훈, "돌궐 유목제국사 552-745" (2016), 사계절
  10. Talat Tekin, "돌궐비문연구" (2008), 제이엔씨
  11. 陝西省歷史博物館, "昭陵文物精華" (1991), 陝西人民美術出版社
  12. 劉永連, "突厥喪葬風俗硏究" (2012), 廣西師範大學出版社
  13. 刘向阳, "唐代帝王陵墓" (2012), 三秦出版社
  14. 林通雁, "中國陵墓彫塑全集" (2009), 陝西人民美術出版社
  15. 新疆新疆維吾爾自治區文物局, "新疆草原石人與鹿石" (2011), 科學出版社
  16. 陳安利, "唐十八陵" (2001), 中國靑年出版社
  17. 林俊雄, "ユーラシアの石人" (2005), 雄山閣
  18. Bayar, D, "The Turkic Stone Statues of Central Mongolia" (1997), Institute of History Mongolian Academy of Science
  19. Eregzen, G, "Archaeological Relics of Mongolia Vol. 3" (2016), Institute of History and Archaeology, Mongolian Academy of Sciences
  20. Tsogtbaatar, B, "Archaeological Study at The Memorial Site of “Dongoin Shiree”" (2017), Institute of History and Archaeology, Mongolian Academy of Science, Osaka University
  21. Samashev, Z., "Shiveet ulaan Ancient Turkic Cult and Memorial Complex" (2016), Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan
  22. АМАРТҮВШИН, Ч, "МОНГОЛЫН ХҮН ЧУЛУУ, МОНГОЛЫН АРХЕОЛОГИЙН ӨВ, Ⅴ БОТБ" (2016), ТҮҮХ, АРХЕОЛОГИЙН ХҮРЭЭЛЭНГИЙН ЭРДМИЙН ЗӨВЛӨЛИЙН БАТАЛСНААР ХЭ
  23. Монголын Үндэсний музей, "Монголын Үндэсний музейн шилдэг үзмэрийн дээжис" (2018), Монголын Үндэсний музей
  24. МӨНХТУЛГА, Р, "ЭРТНИЙ ТҮРЭГИЙН ЯЗГУУРТНЫ ТАХИЛЫН ОНГОНЫ СУДАЛГААНЫ ЗАРИМ АСУУДЛУУД", ULAANBAATAR, ~ (2019)
  25. Шер, Я. А, "КАМЕННЫЕ ИЗВАЯНИЯ СЕМИРЕЧЬЯ" (1966), Наука
  26. 권현주, "투르크제국의 복식문화", 중앙아시아연구, 17(1), pp.153~172 (2012), 중앙아시아학회[DOI]
  27. 김용문, "몽골석인상의 복식연구", 한복문화, 11(3), pp.193~205 (2008), 한복문화학회
  28. 디마자브 에르덴바타르, "몽골 초원의 청동기 문화와 석인상 연구", 史學志, 44 (2012)
  29. 박아림, "몽골 바양노르 벽화묘와 복고을돌묘 출토 용과 비잔틴 금화 연구", 중앙아시아연구, 22(1), pp.73~99 (2017), 중앙아시아학회[DOI]
  30. 박아림, "6-8세기 몽골 초원의 제사유적과 석인상 연구", 중앙아시아연구, 23(2), pp.143~167 (2018), 중앙아시아학회[DOI]
  31. 양민지, "괵투르크 석인상과 발발(balbal)의 의미와 기능에 대한 고찰 -투르크 영혼관을 중심으로-", 중동연구, 35(3), pp.75~102 (2017), 중동연구소
  32. 양예은, "돌궐 복식 연구", 석사, pp.2016
  33. 윤형원, "몽골 석인상의 편년과 상징성에 대한 일고찰", 중앙아시아연구, 11, pp.197~209 (2006), 중앙아시아학회
  34. 정재훈, "몽골의 역사와 초원 문화의 역동", pp.53~60 (2018), 중앙아시아학회
  35. 任宝磊, "新疆地區的突厥遺存与突厥史地研究", 博士, pp.2013
  36. 趙海燕, "新疆昭蘇縣小洪那海草原石人再考", 文博, (2) (2016)
  37. 林俊雄, "モンゴリアの石人", 国立民族学博物館研究報告, 21(1), pp.177~283 (1996)
  38. Alyılmaz, Cengiz, "Ērān ud Anērān: Studies Presented to Boris Il’ič Maršak on the Occasion of His 70th Birthday", pp.51~60 (2006), Libreria Editrice Cafoscarina
  39. Hayashi, Toshio, "Several problems about the Turkic stone statues", Türk Dili Araştırmaları Yıllığı - Belleten, 48, pp.221~240 (2000)
  40. Hayashi, Toshio, "Ērān ud Anērān: Studies Presented to Boris Il’ič Maršak on the Occasion of His 70th Birthday", pp.245~254 (2006), Libreria Editrice Cafoscarina
  41. Hayashi, Toshio, "On the Origin of Turkic Stone Statues", International Journal of Eurasian Studies, 1, pp.181~198 (2011), 商務印書館
  42. Khabdulina, M, "Cult Center of ancient Turks on the territory of Central Kazakhsan", Bulletin of IICAS, 12, pp.33~49 (2010)
  43. Kubarev, "ANCIENT TURKIC STATUES: EPIC HERO OR WARRIOR ANCESTOR?", Archaeology Ethnology and Anthropology of Eurasia, 29(1), pp.136~144 (2007)
  44. Kubarev, "Погребальные памятники древних тюрок в долине р. Хар-Ямаатын-гол (Се веро-Западная Монголия)", Arkheologicheskie vesti, 22, pp.115~129 (2016)
  45. Kubarev, "Burial monuments of ancient Turks in the valley of the Khar-Yamaatyn-Gol River (Northwestern Mongolia)", Archaeological news, pp.115~129 (2016), Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute for The History of Material Culture
  46. Ōsawa, Takashi, "Revisiting the Ongi inscription of Mongolia from the Second Turkic Qaγanate on the basis of rubbings by G. J. Ramstedt", SUSA, 2011, pp.93, 147~203
  47. Yatsenko, Sergey A, "Early Turks: Male Costume in the Chinese Art", Transoxiana, 14 (2009)
  48. Yılmaz, Anıl, "SOME REMARKS ON THE TERM BALBAL OF ANCIENT TURKS", Tarih ve Coğrafya Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(1), pp.1~18 (2018)
  49. Тумур-Очир, Идэрхангай, "ТЮРКСКИЕ ОГРАДКИ МОНГОЛЬСКОГО АЛТАЯ:СИСТЕ МАТИЗАЦИЯ, ХРОНОЛОГИЯ И ИНТЕРПРЕТАЦИЯ" (2017), Алтайский го сударственный университет

관련 논문AI추천

6-8세기 몽골 초원의 제사유적과 석인상 연구박아림, L. 에르덴볼드, 낸시 S. 스타인하트중앙아시아학회 · 중앙아시아연구2018 · 제23권 제2호몽골 볼간 아이막 바양노르 솜 울란 헤렘 벽화묘 연구박아림중앙아시아학회 · 중앙아시아연구2014 · 제19권 제2호몽골 바양노르 벽화묘와 복고을돌묘 출토 용과 비잔틴 금화 연구박아림, L. 에르덴볼드, 낸시 S. 스타인하트중앙아시아학회 · 중앙아시아연구2017 · 제22권 제1호732년 퀼 테긴 제사 시설 건립을 둘러싼 국제 정세정재훈중앙아시아학회 · 중앙아시아연구2015 · 제20권 제1호몽골 석인상의 편년과 상징성에 대한 일고찰에렉젠, 윤형원중앙아시아학회 · 중앙아시아연구2006 · 제11권 14세기 高昌 위구르 후예의 과거 기억 복원 ―《亦都護高昌王世勳碑》의 시조 신화 재검토 ―정재훈중앙아시아학회 · 중앙아시아연구2012 · 제17권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)

마라난타의 출신지와 축건, 간다라이주형pp. 1-32몽골제국 초기 勅令制度의 형성과 그 특징김석환pp. 59-8113～14세기 몽골과 고려의 부마들 ― 통혼의 정치적 의미와 고려왕권의 성격 재론 ―최윤정pp. 83-118실크로드 문화지도 DB 구축 성과와 전망김석환, 정재훈pp. 119-154
원문 보기