6-8세기 몽골 초원의 제사유적과 석인상 연구
The Ritual Complexes and Stone Statues of the 6th to the 8th Centuries in Mongolian Steppe
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Including in the long lineage of the history and culture of the Mongolia steppe starting from the Xiongnu(209 BC- AD 93), the Xianbei(1-3th centuries AD), the Rouran(330-555 AD), the Turk(552-745), the Uyghurs(745-840), the Qidan(901-1125), and the Mongol(1271-1368), the archaeology and art of the Turk period are the contemporary to Koguryo and Parhae which would be the important comparative materials. While the funerary art of the Xianbei has been actively studied based on the excavations and written evidence, the arts of the Rouran and the Turk have not been fully explored due to the lack of the written source and excavation. In this paper, the Turk period ritual complexes and the stone statues have been investigated to determine their characteristics and uniqueness and have been discussed as the case of extraordinary artistic cultural exchanges of the time period. First, it examined the general features of the ritual complexes of the 6th to the 8th centuries of the Turk period in Mongolia. It tried to put the chronological evolution of the ritual complexes of the Turk period in order to understand the differences of the ritual complexes from the 6th century, the 7th century and the 8th century. Next, the general features of the stone statues of the Turk period were viewed in relation with the stone statues found in the Tang tombs of China.
Abstract
Including in the long lineage of the history and culture of the Mongolia steppe starting from the Xiongnu(209 BC- AD 93), the Xianbei(1-3th centuries AD), the Rouran(330-555 AD), the Turk(552-745), the Uyghurs(745-840), the Qidan(901-1125), and the Mongol(1271-1368), the archaeology and art of the Turk period are the contemporary to Koguryo and Parhae which would be the important comparative materials. While the funerary art of the Xianbei has been actively studied based on the excavations and written evidence, the arts of the Rouran and the Turk have not been fully explored due to the lack of the written source and excavation. In this paper, the Turk period ritual complexes and the stone statues have been investigated to determine their characteristics and uniqueness and have been discussed as the case of extraordinary artistic cultural exchanges of the time period. First, it examined the general features of the ritual complexes of the 6th to the 8th centuries of the Turk period in Mongolia. It tried to put the chronological evolution of the ritual complexes of the Turk period in order to understand the differences of the ritual complexes from the 6th century, the 7th century and the 8th century. Next, the general features of the stone statues of the Turk period were viewed in relation with the stone statues found in the Tang tombs of China.
참고문헌 (37)
- 동북아역사재단, "중앙아시아의 바위그림" (2007), 동북아역사재단
- 데 바이에르, "몽골석인상의 연구" (1994), 혜안
- 블라지미르 D. 꾸바레프, "알타이의 제사유적" (1999), 학연문화사
- 유향양, "중국 당대 황제릉 연구" (2012), 서경문화사
- 정재훈, "돌궐 유목제국사 552-745" (2016), 사계절
- 新疆新疆維吾爾自治區文物局, "新疆草原石人與鹿石" (2011), 科学出版社
- 劉永連, "突厥丧葬風俗研究" (2012), 廣西師範大学出版社
- 林 俊雄, "ユーラシアの石人" (2005), 雄山閣
- 程義, "關中地區唐代墓葬研究" (2012), 文物出版社
- 陳安利, "唐十八陵" (2001), 中國靑年出版社
- Amartuvshin, Ch., "Stone Statues of Mongolia" (2016), Institute of History and Archaeology, Mongolian Academy of Sciences
- Eregzen, G., "Ancient Funeral Monuments of Mongolia" (2016), Institute of History and Archaeology, Mongolian Academy of Sciences
- Samashev, Zainolla, "Shiveet Ulaan ancient Turkic Cult and Memorial Complex" (2016), Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan
- Tekin, Talat, "돌궐비문연구" (2008), 제이엔씨
- Шер, Я. А., "КАМЕННЫЕ ИЗВАЯНИЯ СЕМИРЕЧЬЯ" (1966), Наука
- 권현주, "투르크제국의 복식문화", 중앙아시아연구, 17(1), pp.153~172 (2012), 중앙아시아학회[DOI]
- 김용문, "몽골석인상의 복식연구", 한복문화, 11(3), pp.193~205 (2008), 한복문화학회
- 박아림, "몽골에서 최근 발굴된 돌궐시대 벽화고분의 소개", 고구려발해연구, 43, pp.175~200 (2012), 고구려발해학회[DOI]
- 박아림, "몽골 볼간 아이막 바양노르 솜 울란 헤렘 벽화묘 연구", 중앙아시아연구, 19(2), pp.1~25 (2014), 중앙아시아학회[DOI]
- 박아림, "몽골 바양노르 벽화묘와 복고을돌묘 출토 용과 비잔틴 금화 연구", 중앙아시아연구, 22(1), pp.73~99 (2017), 중앙아시아학회[DOI]
- 양민지, "괵투르크 석인상과 발발(balbal)의 의미와 기능에 대한 고찰 -투르크 영혼관을 중심으로-", 중동연구, 35(3), pp.75~102 (2017), 중동연구소
- 양예은, "돌궐 복식 연구", 석사, pp.2016
- 윤형원, "몽골 석인상의 편년과 상징성에 대한 일고찰", 중앙아시아연구, 11, pp.197~209 (2006), 중앙아시아학회
- 정재훈, "퀼 테긴, 빌게 카간 제사 유적의 발굴과 그 의미", 2018년도 춘계공동학술대회 『몽골의 역사와 초원 문화의 역동』, pp.53~60 (2018)
- 최재영, "唐 長安城의 薩寶府 역할과 그 위치―唐朝의 突厥對策과 관련하여―", 중앙아시아연구, 10, pp.25~50 (2005), 중앙아시아학회
- 탁경백, "몽골 고비-알타이 고고유적 조사 성과", 2011 Asia Archaeology (2011), 문화재연구소
- 任宝磊, "新疆地区的突厥遗存与突厥史地研究", 博士, pp.2013
- 趙海燕, "新疆昭蘇縣小洪那海草原石人再考", 文博, (2) (2016)
- Alyılmaz, Cengiz, "Ērān ud Anērān: Studies Presented to Boris Il’ič Maršak on the Occasion of His 70th Birthday", pp.51~60 (2006), Libreria Editrice Cafoscarina
- Hayashi, Toshio, "Several problems about the Turkic stone statues", Türk Dili Araştırmaları Yıllığı - Belleten 2000'den ayrıbasım, 221~240 (2001)
- Hayashi, Toshio, "Ērān ud Anērān: Studies Presented to Boris Il’ič Maršak on the Occasion of His 70th Birthday", pp.245~254 (2006), Libreria Editrice Cafoscarina
- Hayashi, Toshio, "On the Origin of Turkic Stone Statues", 『歐亞學刊』 International Journal of Eurasian Studies, 1, pp.181~198 (2011), 商務印書館
- Kubarev, G. V., "ANCIENT TURKIC STATUES: EPIC HERO OR WARRIOR ANCESTOR?", Archaeology Ethnology and Anthropology of Eurasia, 29(1), pp.136~144 (2007)
- "Arkheologicheskie vesti", 2016, 115~129
- Ōsawa, Takashi, "Revisiting the Ongi inscription of Mongolia from the Second Turkic Qaγanate on the basis of rubbings by G. J. Ramstedt", SUSA, 2011, pp.93, 147~203
- Yatsenko, Sergey A., "Early Turks: Male Costume in the Chinese Art", Transoxiana, 14 (2009)
- Yılmaz, Anıl, "SOME REMARKS ON THE TERM BALBAL OF ANCIENT TURKS", Tarih ve Coğrafya Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(1), pp.1~18 (2018)