班固(32~92)의 匈奴 문제 대응과 그 영향
Ban Gu(32~92)’s Policy Plan and Response to Xiongnu and his Influence on succession Historians
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In 48, the North-South division of the Xiongnu greatly reduced the threat to Han dynasty(漢朝). The Han Dynasty tried to maintain its superiority by using the Southern Xiongnu(南匈奴) to keep the Northern Xiongnu(北匈奴) in check. In response, isolated Northern Xiongnu actively negotiated to overcome this situation. However, since then, the relationship has not been maintained as conflicts with Northern Xiongnu began in earnest. Ban Gu(班固) compiled a history book, Han Shu(漢書), as a family business. He also went further and participated in the Northern Expedition to actively solve the Xiongnu issue. Ban Gu focused on solving the Xiongnu problem and wrote the Biology of Xiongnu, and supplemented the contents by accepting Sima Qian(司馬遷)'s records, Shi ji(史記), as they were. In addition, he tried to edit the contents by focusing on the establishment of measures to suppress the Xiongnu in his writings. This was different from Sima Qian, who tried to objectively describe the Xiongnu and provide accurate information. Ban Gu defined the Xiongnu as a ‘barbarian’ and tried to control them loosely(羈縻), emphasizing their differences from the position of disparaging them. This perception and response to Ban Gu's Xiongnu also had a great influence on Fan Ye(范曄) who later recorded the Southern Xiongnu as an example, and this was further strengthened afterwards. This was a natural result of the stronger confrontation with the Xiongnu and eventually being ruled by them. It should be noted that, contrary to this negative position, the record of Sima Qian tried to provide objective information. This shows the difference between the two recorders and allows them to compare the characteristics of the two records. Considering the characteristics of these records, it is necessary to study the history of Xiongnu in the future.
Abstract
In 48, the North-South division of the Xiongnu greatly reduced the threat to Han dynasty(漢朝). The Han Dynasty tried to maintain its superiority by using the Southern Xiongnu(南匈奴) to keep the Northern Xiongnu(北匈奴) in check. In response, isolated Northern Xiongnu actively negotiated to overcome this situation. However, since then, the relationship has not been maintained as conflicts with Northern Xiongnu began in earnest. Ban Gu(班固) compiled a history book, Han Shu(漢書), as a family business. He also went further and participated in the Northern Expedition to actively solve the Xiongnu issue. Ban Gu focused on solving the Xiongnu problem and wrote the Biology of Xiongnu, and supplemented the contents by accepting Sima Qian(司馬遷)'s records, Shi ji(史記), as they were. In addition, he tried to edit the contents by focusing on the establishment of measures to suppress the Xiongnu in his writings. This was different from Sima Qian, who tried to objectively describe the Xiongnu and provide accurate information. Ban Gu defined the Xiongnu as a ‘barbarian’ and tried to control them loosely(羈縻), emphasizing their differences from the position of disparaging them. This perception and response to Ban Gu's Xiongnu also had a great influence on Fan Ye(范曄) who later recorded the Southern Xiongnu as an example, and this was further strengthened afterwards. This was a natural result of the stronger confrontation with the Xiongnu and eventually being ruled by them. It should be noted that, contrary to this negative position, the record of Sima Qian tried to provide objective information. This shows the difference between the two recorders and allows them to compare the characteristics of the two records. Considering the characteristics of these records, it is necessary to study the history of Xiongnu in the future.
참고문헌 (17)
- "史記", ~
- "漢書", ~
- "後漢書", 中華書局 標點校勘本, ~
- 김한규, "天下國家-전통 시대 동아시아 세계 질서" (2005), 소나무
- 陳其泰, "班固評傳" (2002), 南京大學出版社
- 崔明德, "兩漢民族關係思想史" (2007), 人民出版社
- 渡邊義浩, "中國における正史の形性と儒敎" (2022), 早稻田大學出版部
- 김호동, "『강좌 중국사 - 門閥社會와 胡‧漢의 世界』 Ⅱ" (1989), 지식산업사
- 이재성, "譯註 中國 正史 外國傳 3 : 後漢書外國傳 譯註" (2009), 동북아역사재단
- 정재훈, "譯註 中國 正史 外國傳 2 : 漢書 外國傳譯註" (2009), 동북아역사재단
- 정재훈, "譯註 中國 正史 外國傳 1 : 史記 外國傳 譯註" (2009), 동북아역사재단
- 정재훈, "曹魏, 西晉時期 幷州 匈奴社會 - 五胡十六國의 前奏曲 -", 중앙아시아연구, 15, pp.79~110 (2010), 중앙아시아학회[DOI]
- 정재훈, "司馬遷이 그린 匈奴의 ‘眞相’과 후대의 이해 ― 『史記』 「匈奴列傳」 冒頭의 先祖와 遊牧 관련 기록의 재검토 ―", 중앙아시아연구, 25(2), pp.179~201 (2020), 중앙아시아학회[DOI]
- 정재훈, "『史記』 「匈奴列傳」의 建國 前史 構成", 중앙아시아연구, 26(2), pp.27~47 (2021), 중앙아시아학회[DOI]
- Chin, T. T, "Defamiliarizing the Foreigner – Sima Qian’s Ethnography and Han-Xiongnu Marriage Diplomacy", Harvard Journal of Asian Studies, 70 (2010)
- Pines, Yuri, "MONGOLS, TURKS, AND OTHERS - Eurasian Nomads and the Sedentary World" (2005), Brill
- 辛德勇, "發現燕然山銘", 文史知識, (12) (2017)
