신라 금관의 틸리아 테페 금관 기원설에 대한 검토
A Study on the Origin of the Tillyia Tepe Gold Crown in Silla Gold Crown
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The occurrence of Silla's gold crown was not caused by the unilateral spread of advanced culture. It was produced by the creation of groups in Silla and Gaya based on the social concepts of the worldview and the state-owned land shared with neighboring countries. There is an opinion that the origin of Silla's gold crown was regarded as a direct origin, and that it was spread to the Korean Peninsula by using the Seonbi official residence in the basin of the Daeneung River as an intermediate stop. This is a method of finding the genealogy of culture based on the propagation and system of the origin of the Silla tree-shaped gold crown. This recognizes the origin of culture from the perspective of unilateral advanced culture-centeredness that does not reflect the social concepts of the intellectuals. Similar wooden coffins do not all have the same meaning. In other words, there is a difference in the perspective of recognizing gold crowns depending on the region. In most cases, similar cultural elements such as sacred trees and spiritual birds are used to symbolize various worldviews that have been re-established, depending on various countries and regions. It is unreasonable to think that the gold crown, which was produced at the earliest time, was recognized as a circular shape, and that what was produced at the time was an imitation of the oldest. The view that the direct origin is placed on the gold crown produced at the oldest time may be an unreasonable idea. The metal crown of the early Silla period is the exclusive property of the king, and there are many opinions that it is considered a symbol of authority. However, it seems that the gold crown was mainly used as a funeral ritual for the king or the upper aristocracy. Throughout the mid- to late-term period, the function and social role of the metal pipes excavated from the Silla tombs also changed. The early Silla gold crown was not produced by a single genealogy from the Daewolgeum crown, which was recognized as a form of relief. Early Silla gold crowns were based on post-tax customs on tree of life and birds conceived in the northern grassy nomadic culture of Mongolia, Altai, South Russia, and Scyto Siberian culture on the northern coast of the Black Sea. Based on the nomadic culture of the northern meadow and the Taoist worldview formed in China, the Silla people and Gaya in the Nakdonggang River basin can be seen as being creatively produced by Silla people.
Abstract
The occurrence of Silla's gold crown was not caused by the unilateral spread of advanced culture. It was produced by the creation of groups in Silla and Gaya based on the social concepts of the worldview and the state-owned land shared with neighboring countries. There is an opinion that the origin of Silla's gold crown was regarded as a direct origin, and that it was spread to the Korean Peninsula by using the Seonbi official residence in the basin of the Daeneung River as an intermediate stop. This is a method of finding the genealogy of culture based on the propagation and system of the origin of the Silla tree-shaped gold crown. This recognizes the origin of culture from the perspective of unilateral advanced culture-centeredness that does not reflect the social concepts of the intellectuals. Similar wooden coffins do not all have the same meaning. In other words, there is a difference in the perspective of recognizing gold crowns depending on the region. In most cases, similar cultural elements such as sacred trees and spiritual birds are used to symbolize various worldviews that have been re-established, depending on various countries and regions. It is unreasonable to think that the gold crown, which was produced at the earliest time, was recognized as a circular shape, and that what was produced at the time was an imitation of the oldest. The view that the direct origin is placed on the gold crown produced at the oldest time may be an unreasonable idea. The metal crown of the early Silla period is the exclusive property of the king, and there are many opinions that it is considered a symbol of authority. However, it seems that the gold crown was mainly used as a funeral ritual for the king or the upper aristocracy. Throughout the mid- to late-term period, the function and social role of the metal pipes excavated from the Silla tombs also changed. The early Silla gold crown was not produced by a single genealogy from the Daewolgeum crown, which was recognized as a form of relief. Early Silla gold crowns were based on post-tax customs on tree of life and birds conceived in the northern grassy nomadic culture of Mongolia, Altai, South Russia, and Scyto Siberian culture on the northern coast of the Black Sea. Based on the nomadic culture of the northern meadow and the Taoist worldview formed in China, the Silla people and Gaya in the Nakdonggang River basin can be seen as being creatively produced by Silla people.
참고문헌 (77)
- 정재서, "山海經", pp.7~9 (1997)
- 강건우, "황금인간의 땅, 카자흐스탄", pp.70~79 (2018), 국립중앙박물관
- 강인욱, "韓半島 出土 動物形 帶鉤의 系統에 대한 시론적 검토", 호남고고학보, 19, pp.113~137 (2004), 호남고고학회
- 국립중앙박물관, "스키타이 황금-소련 국립에르미타주 박물관 소장", 180~185 (1991)
- 국립중앙박물관, "로마 이전 에트루리아 THE ETRUSCANS – RISING TO ROME", ~ (2019)
- 국립중앙박물관, "알타이문명전-광복50주년기념ㆍ우리의 뿌리를 찾아서", pp.64~69 (1995)
- 固城 東外里遺蹟 發掘調査 略報告書, "국립진주박물관", ~, pp.KSTO-1 (1996)
- 권영필, "동방의 빛을 따라서-실크로드와 한국문화", pp.17~ (2000)
- 부산대학교박물관, "東萊福泉洞古墳Ⅰ(도면ㆍ도판)", 도면 70, ~ (1982)
- 金吉植, "三國時代 鐵鉾의 變遷-百濟系鐵鉾の認識", 百濟硏究, 24, pp.51~77 (1994), 忠南大學校 百濟硏究所
- 김새봄, "생산과 유통 生産と流通", pp.162~163 (2012), 영남고고학회.구주고고학회
- 김병모, "中原文化論叢 4輯-第5回 招請講演會 要旨", pp.320~ (2019)
- 김병모, "신라금관의 비밀", pp.76~ (2001), 고려문화재연구원
- 金元龍, "신라 금관의 계통" (1981), 學生社
- 김윤아, "유라시아 신화여행-신화, 다시 이어지는 길", pp.76~77 (2018), 아모르문디
- 민병훈, "아프가니스탄의 황금문화", pp.249~251 (2016)
- 박광열, "新羅 積石木槨墓 出土 黃金遺物과 初傳佛敎 - 黃金의 起源과 移入에 대하여 -", 문화사학, (27), pp.203~228 (2007), 한국문화사학회
- 朴普鉉, "樹枝形立華飾冠의 系統", 嶺南考古學, 4, pp.14~15 (1987)
- 朴天秀, "5~6세기 창녕지역 도질토기의 연구", 석사, pp.1990
- 朴天秀, "가야, 신라지역 수장묘 통형기대", 고고학연구, 40, pp.27~48 (1994)
- 박천수, "신라, 유라시아로 나아가다 Silla, Move on to Eurasia", 10~11 (2021)
- 박천수, "가야고고학의 최신 성과와 과제", 유라시아문명사연구회 제12회 정기발표회 (2022)
- 申大坤, "夫餘 論峙里 發掘調査 槪要" (1999), 國立夫餘博物館
- 申大坤, "有刺利器, in『큐레이터와의 대화』 109회", 국립중앙박물관, ~ (2008)
- 申大坤, "한국암각화 현상적 접근", pp.58~60 (2022), 한국암각화학회
- 신동조, "목곽묘로 본 사로국과 신라", pp.121~123 (2020), 국립경주문화재연구소
- 李熙濬, "4-5세기 新羅의 考古學的 硏究", 박사, 고고미술사학, pp.1998
- 李在賢, "弁ㆍ辰韓 社會의 考古學的 硏究", 박사, pp.2003
- 임영애, "서역불교미술에서의 鳥翼冠과 冠帶― 서아시아, 간다라, 서역 간의 교류를 중심으로 ―", 중앙아시아연구, 11, pp.115~140 (2006), 중앙아시아학회
- 요시미즈 츠네오, "로마문화 왕국, 신라", pp.62~97 (2002), 씨앗을 뿌리는 사람
- 요시미즈 츠네오, "신라가 꽃피운 로마문화", pp.79~104 (2019), 미세움
- 제임스 조지 프레이저, "황금가지 The Golden Bough" (2007), 한겨레출판사
- 윤상덕, "아프가니스탄의 황금문화", pp.129~ (2015), 국립중앙박물관ㆍ국립경주박물관
- 윤상덕, "신라의 황금문화와 불교미술" (2016), 국립경주박물관
- 李殷昌, "韓國의 裝身具", pp.8~9 (1991)
- 原久仁子, "筒形銅器의 用途推定論에 대한 재검토", 東北亞古文化論叢, pp.41~53 (2002)
- 尹世英, "古新羅ㆍ伽耶古墳の編年に關して", 白山學報, 17 (1974)
- 李健茂, "韓國 靑銅儀器의 硏究-소위 異形銅器를 中心으로", 석사, pp.1987
- 이병호, "아프가니스탄의 황금문화", pp.56~ (2015), 국립중앙박물관ㆍ국립경주박물관
- 이송란, "황남대총 신라관의 기술적 계보", 한국고대사연구, 31, pp.111~148 (2003), 한국고대사학회
- 李盛周, "新羅ㆍ伽耶社會의 起源과 成長" (1998), 學硏文化史
- 이주헌, "아프가니스탄의 황금문화" (2015), 국립중앙박물관〮ㆍ국립경주박물관
- 이한상, "황금의 나라 신라" (2004), 김영사
- 李仁淑, "古新羅期裝身具に對する一考察", 歷史學報, 62 (1974)
- 李仁淑, "伽耶時代裝身具樣式考-冠帽と耳飾ㆍ頸飾を中心に", 韓國學論集, 14 (1988)
- 李在永, "考古硏究 1" (1989), 嶺南靑年考古硏究會
- 李鍾宣, "고신라의 삼산관-고신라의 政治構造와 관련하여", 『한국상고사학회 학술발표회』 제18회, pp.63~93 (2000), 한국상고사학회
- 이청규, "동아시아의 역사Ⅰ", pp.166~169 (2011), 동북아시아역사재단
- 조흥윤, "한국 샤머니즘의 기원과 계통", 제3회 박물관 성인강좌, pp.71~77 (1994), 국립전주박물관
- 주경미, "아프가니스탄 틸리야테페 출토 금제 장신구 연구", 중앙아시아연구, 19(2), pp.27~54 (2014), 중앙아시아학회[DOI]
- 주경미, "北魏時代 平城地域 출토 금속공예품의 국제성", 중앙아시아연구, 25(2), pp.47~86 (2020), 중앙아시아학회[DOI]
- 최영은, "영산강유역 수장묘의 재해석-웅진기 백제 지방지배의 일면", 유라시아의 왕릉-2022년 공동 국제학술심포지엄 (2022), 경북대 고고인류학과 BK21 Four 교육연구팀
- 岡內三眞, "慶州發見新羅初期金冠", 考古學ジャ-ナル, (78) (1973)
- 高慶秀, "韓半島における鐵製武器に關する考察-三韓.三國時代の有刺利器を中心に", 祭祀考古學, 3, pp.93~120 (2002), 祭祀考古學會
- 韓國 祭祀遺蹟 祭祀關連遺物-忠島祭祀 比較檢討資料, In 宗像・沖ノ島と関連遺産群 研究報告Ⅰ, "高慶秀", 437~ (2011)
- 東 潮, "高句麗考古學硏究" (1997), 吉川弘文館
- 弁辰と加耶の鐵, In 第5回 歷博國際シンポジウム 古代東アジアにおける倭と伽耶の交流 國立歷史博物館硏究報告, "高慶秀", 32~35 (2004)
- 毛利光俊彦, "新羅積石木槨墳考", 文化財論叢 (1983)
- 毛利光俊彦, "竪口直先生古稀記念論文集", pp.930~938 (1996)
- 毛利光俊彦, "西谷眞治先生古稀記念論文集", pp.700~712 (1995)
- 朴天秀, "渡來系文物にえる伽耶と倭の政治的變動", 大兼山論總, (29), pp.53~84 (1995), 史學編 大阪大學文學部
- 徐姈男, "三韓・三国時代鉄器の儀器的性格に関する一考察", 伽耶考古学論叢, 2, pp.155~ (1997), 駕洛国史蹟開発研究院
- 石渡美江, "樹木狀立飾冠의 系譜와 意義", 古代 オリエント博物館紀要, 9 (1987)
- 宇野愼民, "儀禮的裝身具にみる日韓交涉一視點", 103~146 (1996)
- 武器のもつ問題, In 昌寧 桂城里 學術調査報告 –桂南1.4號墳-(9), "李殷昌", 嶺南大學校博物館, ~ (1991)
- 早乙女雅博, "新羅加耶の冠-小倉コレショソの硏究(一)-", 『MUSEUM』 東京國立博物館美術誌, (3) (1982)
- 齊藤大輔, "『福岡大学考古学論集2』 一考古学研究室開設25周年記念一福岡大学 考古学研究V" (2013)
- 穴澤和光, "北燕馮素弗墓の提起する問題-日本ㆍ朝鮮考古學との關聯性", 考古學ジャナル, 85 (1973)
- 孙 機, "步摇, 步摇冠摇叶饰片", 文物, 11 (1991)
- 田立坤, "步搖冠源流考察", 北方文物, 2021(6) (2021)
- 李細珍, "阿富汗蒂拉丘地出土服饰所见东西文化互动", 丝绸-历史与文化, (6) (2020)
- 甘肅省文物硏究所, "西戎遺珍-馬家塬戰國墓地出土文物" (2014), 文物出版社
- 辛欣, "北方地區戰國至遼“金飾墓主玄象”硏究", 碩士, pp.2020
- 田立坤, "三燕文化的馬具文飾", 東北亞古代文化論叢, 6 (2008)
- 遼寧省文物考古硏究所, "三燕文物", pp.1~26 (2002), 遼寧省人民出版社
- Kang Duk Hee, "Gold Crowns of Shibarghan in Afganistan and of the Three Kingdoms Period of Korea", Korea Journal, 23(6) (1983)
- Herzfeld, E., "La Sculpture Rupestre de la Perse Sassannide", Revue des Arts Asiatiques, V, pp.129~142 (1928)