본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

1911년 독립과 민족통합운동의 재검토 ― 대몽골국 계승 의식을 중심으로 ―

Review of Mongolian independence in 1911 and national integration movement ― Focusing on the succession consciousness of Ikh Mongol uls ―

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

In this thesis, I reviewed the consciousness of succession of Ikh Mongol uls that appeared in the process of Mongolia's independence in 1911 and the national integration movement that developed for several years thereafter. As a result, I confirmed the following. First, the Mongol princes who led independence in 1911 understood the establishment of a new state as the reconstruction or succession of Ikh Mongol uls founded by Chingis khaan in 1206. In the related documents, a number of records are confirmed that write the newly established Mongol uls as Ikh Mongol uls, the government of Bogd khaan as the government of Ikh Mongol uls, and its head as Bogd khaan of Ikh Mongol uls. All of this tells us that the Ikh Mongol uls succession consciousness was widespread among the Mongols at the time. Second, the Mongolian princes who led independence in 1911 also understood the establishment of a new state as the reconstruction or succession of Ikh Yuan uls. In other words, in related materials, there are quite a few records that write that the newly established Mongol uls was a state established according to the old rules of Ikh Yuan uls, and a state established 500 years after the collapse of Ikh Yuan uls. Ikh Yuan uls in the data is a Chinese character representation of Ikh Mongol uls, not the Yuan dynasty that constitutes Ikh Mongol uls. This is proof that the Ikh Mongol uls succession consciousness and the Ikh Yuan uls succession consciousness were also widespread among the Mongols at the time. Third, the Mongolian princes who led independence in 1911 recognized Bogd khaan as the successor of Chingis khaan. In other words, in related materials, there are many records that call Chingis khaan the founder of Ikh Mongol uls or the founder of Ikh Yuan uls, and call Bogd khaan his successor. Therefore, the coronation ceremony of Bogd khaan was also held according to the custom of Chingis khaan era, and there are also sources calling Bogd khaan a descendant of Chingis khaan. Indeed, since Bogd khaan is the eighth reincarnation of Zanabazar, a descendant of Chingis khaan, it is also true that he is said to be a descendant of Chingis khaan in spirit.

Abstract

In this thesis, I reviewed the consciousness of succession of Ikh Mongol uls that appeared in the process of Mongolia's independence in 1911 and the national integration movement that developed for several years thereafter. As a result, I confirmed the following. First, the Mongol princes who led independence in 1911 understood the establishment of a new state as the reconstruction or succession of Ikh Mongol uls founded by Chingis khaan in 1206. In the related documents, a number of records are confirmed that write the newly established Mongol uls as Ikh Mongol uls, the government of Bogd khaan as the government of Ikh Mongol uls, and its head as Bogd khaan of Ikh Mongol uls. All of this tells us that the Ikh Mongol uls succession consciousness was widespread among the Mongols at the time. Second, the Mongolian princes who led independence in 1911 also understood the establishment of a new state as the reconstruction or succession of Ikh Yuan uls. In other words, in related materials, there are quite a few records that write that the newly established Mongol uls was a state established according to the old rules of Ikh Yuan uls, and a state established 500 years after the collapse of Ikh Yuan uls. Ikh Yuan uls in the data is a Chinese character representation of Ikh Mongol uls, not the Yuan dynasty that constitutes Ikh Mongol uls. This is proof that the Ikh Mongol uls succession consciousness and the Ikh Yuan uls succession consciousness were also widespread among the Mongols at the time. Third, the Mongolian princes who led independence in 1911 recognized Bogd khaan as the successor of Chingis khaan. In other words, in related materials, there are many records that call Chingis khaan the founder of Ikh Mongol uls or the founder of Ikh Yuan uls, and call Bogd khaan his successor. Therefore, the coronation ceremony of Bogd khaan was also held according to the custom of Chingis khaan era, and there are also sources calling Bogd khaan a descendant of Chingis khaan. Indeed, since Bogd khaan is the eighth reincarnation of Zanabazar, a descendant of Chingis khaan, it is also true that he is said to be a descendant of Chingis khaan in spirit.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. 岡田英弘, "蒙古源流" (2004), 刀水書房
  2. 內蒙古圖書館, "內蒙古歷史文獻叢書 2" (2007), 遠方出版社
  3. 陳崇祖, "外蒙近世史(全)" (1965), 文海出版社
  4. 陳春華, "俄國外交文書選譯" (1991), 黑龍江敎育出版社
  5. Бурдков, А.В., "В старой и новой Монголии" (1969), Изд-во<Наука>
  6. "В. Котвичийн хувийн архиваас олдсон монголын түүхэнд холбогдох зарим бичиг, Судлан хэвлүүлсэн Б. Ширэндэв. Эрхлэсэн Ш. Нацагдорж", Шинжлэх ухааны академийн хэвлэл, ~ (1972)
  7. Дэндэв, Л., "Монголын товч түүх, Монгол бичгээс хөрвүүлж оршил бичиж тайлбар нэрсийн хэлхээ хийсэн доктор С. Чулуун", Монгол улсын их сургууль, ~ (2006)
  8. Дэндэв, Л., "Монголын түүхийн сурвалж(1911~1921), Эмхтгэж хэвлэлд бэлтгэсэн О. Батсайхан", Соёмбо, ~ (2013)
  9. Магсаржав, Н., "Монголын шинэ түүх, Эрхлэн хэвлүүлсэн З. Лонжид, О. Батсайхан", Соёмбо, ~ (2015)
  10. "Монголчуудын нэгдсэн улс байгуулахын төлөөх тэмцэл(1911~1915). Баримт бичгийн эмхтгэл 1, 2, 3, Эмхтгэж хэвлэлд бэлтгэсэн: Ж. Гэрэлбадрах, Эрхэлсэн: Ж. Урангуа", Адмон, ~ (2014)
  11. Навааннамжил, Г., "Өвгөн бичээчийн өгүүлэл" (1956), Улсын хэвлэлийн газар
  12. Попов, И.И., "От Небесной империи к Серединной республике" (1912), В. М. Саблин
  13. Рерих, Ю.Н., "Тибет и Центральная Азия. Статьи, лекции, переводы" (1999), Издательский дом «Агни»
  14. M. Gō, I. de Rachewiltz, "Erdeni-yin tobci(‘Precious summary’): a Mongolian chronicle of 1662. 1" (1990), Faculty of Asian Studies, Australian National University
  15. 김호동, "몽골제국과 ‘大元’", 역사학보, (192), pp.221~253 (2006), 역사학회
  16. 권용철, "17~18세기 전반 몽골문 史書의 大元帝國 역사 서술 ― 황제들의 生沒, 즉위 연도 및 계보에 대한 비교 분석을 중심으로 ―", 동양사학연구, (128), pp.297~348 (2014), 동양사학회
  17. 발터 하이시히, "몽골의 종교" (2003), 소나무
  18. 이평래, "20세기 초기 Ar(北) 몽골 王公들의 政局構想과 帝政 러시아", 한몽공동학술연구, 4, pp.229~259 (1995)
  19. 이평래, "1911년 몽골 독립과 민족 통합 운동의 초기 과정", 동양사학연구, (104), pp.155~190 (2008), 동양사학회
  20. 이평래, "1912-1913년 복드 정부의 내몽골 통합 시도와 좌절", 중앙아시아연구, 14, pp.55~84 (2009), 중앙아시아학회[DOI]
  21. 유원수, "맑은 타미르강" (2007), 민음사
  22. 森川哲雄, "大元の記憶", 比較社會文化, 14, pp.65~81 (2008)
  23. 矢野仁一, "近代蒙古史硏究" (1940), 弘文堂書房
  24. 張啓雄, "汎モンゴル統一運動―別角度から見たハルハ獨立―", 人文學報, 85, pp.27~61 (2001)
  25. 中見立夫, "陳崇祖"外蒙近世史"の史料的價値--ボグド・ハーン制モンゴル國時代の若干の中国側史料の考察", 史學雜誌, 85(8), pp.1177~1194 (1976)
  26. Болдбаатар, Ж., "Монгол улсын түүх, Тавдугаар боть" (2003), ADMON
  27. Жамсран, Л., "Монголчуудын сэргэн мандалтын эхэн" (1992), Соёмбо
  28. Жүгдэр, Ч., "XIX-XX зууны зааг дахь Монголын нийгэм-улс төр, философийн сэтгэлгээний хөгжил" (1972), БНМАУ-ын ШУА-ийн түүхийн хүрээлэн философи эрхийн тасаг
  29. Лодойдамба, Ч., "Тунгалаг тамир" (1971), Улсын хэвлэлийн газар
  30. Пунцагноров, Ц., "Монголын автономит үеийн түүх" (1955), Улсын хэвлэл ба хэвлэлийн үйлдвэрлэлийг эрхлэх газар
  31. Сандаг, Ш., "Монголын улс төрийн гадаад харилцаа" (1971), Шинжлэх ухааны академийн хэвлэл
  32. Bawden, C.R., "The Modern History of Mongolia" (1989), Kegan Paul International
  33. Ewing, T.E., "Between the Hammer and the Anvil? Chinese and Russian Policies in Outer Mongolia 1911~1921" (1980), Research Institute for Inner Asian Studies, Indiana University
  34. Lan, Mei-hua, "The Mongolian Independence Movement of 1911: A Pan-Mongolian Endeavor", Ph.D., pp.1996
  35. Lattimore, Owen, "Diluv Khutagt-Memoirs Autobiography of a Mongol Buddist Reincarnation in Religion and Revolution" (1982), Otto Harrassowitz
  36. Onon, Urgunge, "Asia's First Modern Revolution" (1989), LeidenㆍNew YorkㆍKøbenhavenㆍKöln

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)