본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

20세기 전기 한국 지식인들의 몽골 인식 1 ― 과거, 현재, 미래에 대한 평가와 전망 ―

Korean Intellectuals' Recognition on Mongolia in the First Half of the 20th Century 1 ― Evaluation of the Past, Present and the Future ―

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This study is an analysis on the recognition of the Korean intellectuals in the first half of the 20th century on the past, present, and the future of Mongolia reflected on the newspapers and magazines published at that time of era. In short, the observation of Mongolia by the Korean intellectuals can be summarized as the prosperous past, the comedown of the present, and the future with the coexistence of hope and anxiety. It is possible to describe this evaluation as an interpretation related to the circumstances of Korea at that period although it is primarily based on phenomena in Mongolia itself. The Korean newspapers and magazines published in the early 20th century reported mainly about the achievements of Chingiz Khan and the Mongol Empire. Primarily, this is a reflection of unconditional obedience to authority and men with power. On the other hand, the background of this situation can be interpreted as the desire of the times toward the national prosperity and defense, modernization, and the restoration of national power. Also, in this period, the press reported many comments on the Mongolian conquering even the West not just the East. It is assumed that the hostility toward the West and imperialism, the inferiority complex on getting left behind the modernization, and getting vicarious satisfaction through Mongolia were the psychological factors in the background. Secondly, almost every Korean intellectuals regarded the present of Mongolia as a ruined country. This opinion was based on the facts that Mongolians were spreaded inside and outside of the country, other industries like agriculture or commerce were limited except living a nomadic life, and the people were unenlightened because of being domesticated by Lamaism. Even though these are conclusions based on phenomena at that time, it can be also described as a result of the Korean intellectuals' cult of China's perspective toward Mongolia which was divided into civilization and barbarism. In other words, Korean intellectuals were following the old tradition which was focused on the point of view of the agricultural people, that is, the Chinese conflicting with the nomadic people. The third point is that the evaluation of the future of Mongolia from Korean intellectuals included various viewpoints which indicate the coexistence of hope and anxiety. The difference of recognition occur mainly in the evaluation of the 1921 revolution and the 1930s autonomy and independence movement in Inner Mongolia. Some of them evaluate two events positively or negatively, when some evaluate the revolution positively and the autonomy movement negatively. The position in political issues or thoughts, the situation of the Japanese colonial period, the influence of Japanese press, and the China's stance which was opposed to the independency of the minority group were factors influencing the Korean intellectuals' opinions upon Mongolia.

Abstract

This study is an analysis on the recognition of the Korean intellectuals in the first half of the 20th century on the past, present, and the future of Mongolia reflected on the newspapers and magazines published at that time of era. In short, the observation of Mongolia by the Korean intellectuals can be summarized as the prosperous past, the comedown of the present, and the future with the coexistence of hope and anxiety. It is possible to describe this evaluation as an interpretation related to the circumstances of Korea at that period although it is primarily based on phenomena in Mongolia itself. The Korean newspapers and magazines published in the early 20th century reported mainly about the achievements of Chingiz Khan and the Mongol Empire. Primarily, this is a reflection of unconditional obedience to authority and men with power. On the other hand, the background of this situation can be interpreted as the desire of the times toward the national prosperity and defense, modernization, and the restoration of national power. Also, in this period, the press reported many comments on the Mongolian conquering even the West not just the East. It is assumed that the hostility toward the West and imperialism, the inferiority complex on getting left behind the modernization, and getting vicarious satisfaction through Mongolia were the psychological factors in the background. Secondly, almost every Korean intellectuals regarded the present of Mongolia as a ruined country. This opinion was based on the facts that Mongolians were spreaded inside and outside of the country, other industries like agriculture or commerce were limited except living a nomadic life, and the people were unenlightened because of being domesticated by Lamaism. Even though these are conclusions based on phenomena at that time, it can be also described as a result of the Korean intellectuals' cult of China's perspective toward Mongolia which was divided into civilization and barbarism. In other words, Korean intellectuals were following the old tradition which was focused on the point of view of the agricultural people, that is, the Chinese conflicting with the nomadic people. The third point is that the evaluation of the future of Mongolia from Korean intellectuals included various viewpoints which indicate the coexistence of hope and anxiety. The difference of recognition occur mainly in the evaluation of the 1921 revolution and the 1930s autonomy and independence movement in Inner Mongolia. Some of them evaluate two events positively or negatively, when some evaluate the revolution positively and the autonomy movement negatively. The position in political issues or thoughts, the situation of the Japanese colonial period, the influence of Japanese press, and the China's stance which was opposed to the independency of the minority group were factors influencing the Korean intellectuals' opinions upon Mongolia.

참고문헌 (49)

  1. "勸業新聞", ~
  2. "開闢", ~
  3. "大東亞", ~
  4. "大東學會月報", ~
  5. "東光", ~
  6. "獨立新聞", ~
  7. "東明", ~
  8. "東亞日報", ~
  9. "滿洲日報", ~
  10. "每日新報", ~
  11. "別乾坤", ~
  12. "三千里", ~
  13. "西友", ~
  14. "時代日報", ~
  15. "新文界", ~
  16. "新民", ~
  17. "晨報", ~
  18. "新韓民報", ~
  19. "朝鮮日報", ~
  20. "朝鮮中央日報", ~
  21. "中央", ~
  22. "中外日報", ~
  23. "太極學報", ~
  24. "韓民", ~
  25. "彗星", ~
  26. 계봉우, "꿈속의 꿈 下, In 북우계봉우자료집 1", 독립기념관
  27. 夢陽呂運亨先生全集發刊委員會, "夢陽呂運亨先生全集 1" (1991), 한울
  28. "熱河日記 「黃敎問答」(고전번역총서, 한국고전데이터베이스)", ~
  29. "韋庵文稿 卷之十 外集 社說下 「中國情形, 支那의領土 中國의五色旗」", ~
  30. "臨時政府施政方針, In 한국독립운동사 자료 2 (임정편Ⅱ)", 독립기념관 한국독립운동사 정보시스템
  31. 關東都督部陸軍部, "東蒙古", 關東都督部陸軍部
  32. ドムョクドンロププ, "德王自傳" (2009), 岩波書店
  33. 宋本雋, "東蒙古の眞相", 兵林館
  34. 김도형, "한말 · 일제하 한국인의 만주 인식", 동방학지, (144), pp.1~32 (2008), 국학연구원
  35. 게.이. 람스테트, "일곱 차례 동방 여행" (1986), 민음사
  36. 니콜라 디코스모, "오랑캐의 탄생" (2005), 민음사
  37. 반병률, "의사(醫師) 이태준(李泰俊, 1883-1921)의 항일민족운동과 몽골", 역사문화연구, pp.277~292 (2005), 朴星來敎授定年記念特別號
  38. 손현숙, "Danzan의 정치적 활동과 사상, In 歷史 속의 人物 김문경 교수 정년퇴임기념 동아시아사 연구논총" (1996)
  39. 송미령, "17-18세기 조선정부의 몽골 이해", 중국사연구, (62), pp.137~167 (2009), 중국사학회
  40. 양지선, "韓人의 內蒙古 地域 移住에 관한 연구", 한국근현대사연구, (43), pp.72~103 (2007), 한국근현대사학회
  41. 요코하마 히로아키, "중화민족의 탄생" (2012), 한울
  42. 李平來, "몽골 외무부 소장 1920년대 한국 관련 자료", 중앙아시아연구, 8, pp.3~73 (2003), 중앙아시아학회
  43. 이평래, "1911년 몽골 독립선언에 대한 중국 역사학자들의 인식, In 중국 역사가들의몽골사 인식", pp.141~182 (2006), 고구려재단
  44. 張錫興, "1910~20년대 몽골지역에서 전개된 한국독립운동", 한국근현대사연구, 23 (2002), 한국근현대사학회
  45. 한석정, "만주, 동아시아 융합의 공간" (2008), 소명출판
  46. 韓詩俊, "內蒙古지역의 한국독립운동", 한국근현대사연구, 23 (2002), 한국근현대사학회
  47. 中見立夫, "內モンゴル東部"という空間-東アジア國際關係史の視點から-, In 近現代モンゴル東部の變容", pp.21~46 (2007), 雄山閣
  48. 楊海英, "中國人ガ語りはじめた遊牧文明, In 朝倉世界地理講座-大地と人間の物語- 2,東北アジア", pp.220~228 (2009), 朝倉書店
  49. Tatsuo, Nakami, "I.Y.Korostovets and Mongol Problem of Independence in the Early 1910s, In Essay on Mongol Studies, Ulaanbaatar: Olon ulsyn mongol sudlalyn kholboo", pp.168~175 (1998), Mongol ulsyn shinjlekh ukhaany akademi tüükhiin khüreleen

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)