Bivariate Ordered Probit 모형을 이용한 미국 농업의 다원적 기능에 대한 소비자 인식분석
Assessing Public Attitude for Multifunctional Roles of the U.S. Agriculture Using a Bivariate Ordered Probit Model
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study conducts a survey and test to understand U.S. public’s perception about multifunctionality. The questionnaire suggests seven alternative way of providing questions about intangible benefits provided by agriculture in the U.S. The final questionnaire was administered as an e-mail survey in June 2008 to a nationally representative household panel maintained in the U.S. by the Ipsos Observer. Data analysis shows that 64 percent of respondents considered the multifunctionality of agriculiture as an important issue and 45 percent of respondents were in favor of increasing government expenditure to support farmland preservation. Using Fishbein’s multi-attribute model as a theoretical background, this paper develops an empirical model to assess and attributes of multifunctionality. For the analysis, bivariate orderd probit model was set up to reflect respondent’s attitude. Regression analyses show that two questions (how much you agree with agriculture’s intangible benefit and increasing government expenditure to support agriculture) are shaped by different sets of facts.
Abstract
This study conducts a survey and test to understand U.S. public’s perception about multifunctionality. The questionnaire suggests seven alternative way of providing questions about intangible benefits provided by agriculture in the U.S. The final questionnaire was administered as an e-mail survey in June 2008 to a nationally representative household panel maintained in the U.S. by the Ipsos Observer. Data analysis shows that 64 percent of respondents considered the multifunctionality of agriculiture as an important issue and 45 percent of respondents were in favor of increasing government expenditure to support farmland preservation. Using Fishbein’s multi-attribute model as a theoretical background, this paper develops an empirical model to assess and attributes of multifunctionality. For the analysis, bivariate orderd probit model was set up to reflect respondent’s attitude. Regression analyses show that two questions (how much you agree with agriculture’s intangible benefit and increasing government expenditure to support agriculture) are shaped by different sets of facts.
참고문헌 (40)
- 서성한, "소비자 행동론" (2005), 박영사
- 농림수산식품부, "알기쉬운 DDA협상용어자료집", ~ (2008)
- 오세익, "농업의 다원적 기능에 대한 국민의식조사", 한국농촌경제연구원, ~ (2004)
- 권오상, "설문조사기법을 이용한 다원적 농업의 범위의 경제성 검정", 농업경제연구, 45(2), pp.85~110 (2004), 한국농업경제학회
- 김수석 Kim Soo-Suk, "<연구 노트> 농업의 다원적 기능에 대한 가치 평가", 농촌경제, 26(2), pp.47~58 (2003), 한국농촌경제연구원
- 김은자, "농업‧농촌의 공익기능 인식 평가", 농촌사회, 11(2), pp.135~158 (2001), 한국농촌사회학회
- 성진근, "농업의 다기능에 관한 소고", 99동계심포지움 (2000), 한국농업경제학회
- 안윤수, "농촌의 공익적 기능 평가 연구: 농촌의 정서함양기능, 전통문화 보전기능, 지역사회 유지기능, 녹지공간 제공기능 가치평가 연구" (2003), 농업과학기술원
- 안윤수, "농촌의 사회문화적 공익기능 가치 평가", 농촌사회, 15(1), pp.175~214 (2005), 한국농촌사회학회
- 이광석, "농촌방문의 경제적 편익", 농업경제연구, 37, pp.147~159
- 이상영, "농촌의 다원적 기능에 대한 지불의사 분석", 농업경영.정책연구, 30(3), pp.524~535 (2003), 한국농업정책학회.한국축산경영학회
- 이정환, "한 미 FTA 대응 미국 농업예산 및 농업법 연구와 시사점 도출", GS & J., ~ (2006)
- 임정빈, "농업의 다원적 기능에 대한 국제적 논의 내용과 주요 쟁점", 농업생명과학연구, 37(3), pp.83~90 (2003)
- Adams, J. D., "Learning, Internal Research, and Spillovers", Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15, pp.5~36 (2006)
- Burrell, A., "Multifunctionality and Agricultural Trade Liberalisation", 77th EAAE Seminar, 2001, 17~18
- Cairns Group, "Statement by the Carins Group to Special Session of the WTO Agriculture Committee", ~ (2000)
- Calhoun,C., "Estimating the Distribution of Desired Family Size and Excess Fertility", Journal of Human Resources, 24(4), pp.709~724 (1989)
- Dunlap, R. E., "Environmental Concern: A Bibliography of Empirical Studies and Brief Appraisal of the Literature in Public Administration Series Bibliography No. P-44. Monticello" (1978), Vance Bibliographies. August
- Dunlap, R. E., "The setting for the crack era: Macro forces", micro consequences (1960-92). J. Psychoactive Drugs, 24(3), pp.307~321 (1992)
- Ferris, J. M., "Demands for Public Spending: An Attitudinal Approach", Public Choice, 40, pp.135~154 (1983)
- Fishbein,M., "Attitude and the Prediction of Behavior, Reading in Attitude Theory and Measurement" (1967), Wiley
- Greene, W. H., "Econometric Analysis. 5th Edition, Upper Saddle River" (2003), Prentice-Hall
- Hellerstein, D., "Farmland Protection: The Role of Public Preferences for Rural Amenities", Agr. Econ. Report. No. 815. USDA Economic Research Service. Washington. DC, ~ (2002)
- Hewitt, D., "Demand for National Public Goods: Estimates from Surveys", Economic Inquiry, 23, pp.487~506 (1985)
- Josling, Tim., "Competing Paradigms in the OECD and Their Impacts on the WTO Agricultural Talks. Agricultural Policy for the 21 Century", pp.245~264 (2002), Ames, Iowa State Press
- Lawrence, C. N., "Heuristics, Hillary Clinton, and Health Care Reform", Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, ~ (2002)
- Libby, L., "Farmland is Not Just for Farming Any More: The Policy Trends. Agricultural Policy for the 21 Century" (2002), Iowa State Press
- OECD, "Agriculture and the Environment: Issues and Policies. Directorate for Food. Agriculture and Fisheries", OECD
- OECD, "Monitoring and Outlook for Agricultural Policies" (1998), Markets and Trade
- OECD, "Policy Brief: Agricultural Policies in OECD countries: A Positive Reform Agenda" (2003), OECD
- Paarlberg, P. L., "Multifunctionality and Agricultural Trade Negotiations", Review of Agricultural Economics, 24, pp.322~335
- Pope, R. D., "Agricultural Factions", American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68, pp.1096~1101
- Moon, W., "A Multi-attribute Model of Public Acceptance of Genetically Modified Organism", pp.5~8 (2001), Annual American Agricultural Economics Association Meeting
- Moon, W., "Willingness to Pay for Environmental Practices: Implications for Eco-Labeling", Land Economics, 78(1) (2002)
- Moon, W., "Willingness to Pay for Non-biotech Foods in the U.S and U.K", Journal of Consumer Affairs, 37, pp.317~339 (2003)
- 문완기, "Registered Voters' Preferences for the Multifunctionality of Agriculture in the U.S.", 농업경영.정책연구, 36(1), pp.1~34 (2009), 한국농업정책학회
- Scott, D. M., "Household mobility tool ownership: modeling interactions between cars and season tickets", Transportation from Springer, 33(4), pp.311~328 (2006)
- Yamamoto, T., "Bivariate ordered-response probit model of driver’s and passenger’s injury severities in collisions with fixed objects", Accident Analysis and Prevention, 36(5), pp.869~876 (2004)
- Varyam, J. N., "Preference of Citizens for Agricultural Policies: Evidence from a National Survey", American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 72, pp.258~267 (1990)
- Vera-Toscano, E., "Individuals’ Opinion on Agricultural Multifunctionality", Spanish Journal of Agriculture Research, 5(3), pp.271~284 (2007)