선택실험법을 이용한 농업ㆍ농촌 공익기능의 경제적 가치평가 - 어메니티 제공기능을 중심으로 -
Economic Valuation of the Public Function of Agriculture and Rural Areas Using Choice Experiment - Focusing on Amenity Provision Function -
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study attempts to examine consumers’ perception towards the amenity provision function of agriculture and rural areas and appraise its economic value. For the economic valuation of the ‘amenity function,’ a non-market good, CE (Choice Experiment) method was applied in this study. Some of the findings from the awareness survey to be highlighted are as follows. When asked how important public function of agriculture and rural areas is, 79.0% (1,579 respondents) answered ‘important,’ and only 1.4% (27 respondents) answered ‘not important.’ Among the respondents, 77.9% (1,558 respondents) expressed that they would consider rural areas as potential destinations for leisure time whreas 22.1% (442 respondents) answered they would not. Moreover, 81.6% (1,632 respondents) answered ‘yes’ to the statement that ‘developmet of rural areas in an unsustinable manner is damaging rural landscape’ whereas only 18.4% (368 respondents) answered ‘no.’ In regard to the importance of public funciton of agriuclture and rural areas, 78.4% (1,568 respondents) shared a positive view expressing that the importance will be increased in the future, but 21.6% (432 respondents) expressed an opposite view. Above all, the total value of the amenity function is estimated approximately 7 trillion Korean won. The public demands for rural areas as spaces for leisure time and recreational activities is expected to increase in the future. Therefore, the results presented in this study highlight that a national-level policy support is highly needed in order to maintain and expand public function of agriculture and rural areas.
Abstract
This study attempts to examine consumers’ perception towards the amenity provision function of agriculture and rural areas and appraise its economic value. For the economic valuation of the ‘amenity function,’ a non-market good, CE (Choice Experiment) method was applied in this study. Some of the findings from the awareness survey to be highlighted are as follows. When asked how important public function of agriculture and rural areas is, 79.0% (1,579 respondents) answered ‘important,’ and only 1.4% (27 respondents) answered ‘not important.’ Among the respondents, 77.9% (1,558 respondents) expressed that they would consider rural areas as potential destinations for leisure time whreas 22.1% (442 respondents) answered they would not. Moreover, 81.6% (1,632 respondents) answered ‘yes’ to the statement that ‘developmet of rural areas in an unsustinable manner is damaging rural landscape’ whereas only 18.4% (368 respondents) answered ‘no.’ In regard to the importance of public funciton of agriuclture and rural areas, 78.4% (1,568 respondents) shared a positive view expressing that the importance will be increased in the future, but 21.6% (432 respondents) expressed an opposite view. Above all, the total value of the amenity function is estimated approximately 7 trillion Korean won. The public demands for rural areas as spaces for leisure time and recreational activities is expected to increase in the future. Therefore, the results presented in this study highlight that a national-level policy support is highly needed in order to maintain and expand public function of agriculture and rural areas.
참고문헌 (20)
- Choi, A. S., "Nonmarket Values of Major Resources in the Korean ares : A Test of Distance Decay", Ecological Economics, 88, pp.97~107 (2013)
- 최성록, "선택실험을 이용한 서울 도시녹지 어메니티의 경제가치 평가", 자원환경경제연구, 27(1), pp.105~138 (2018), 한국환경경제학회[DOI]
- Hehsher D. A., "Applied Choice Analysis" (2015), Cambridge University Press
- 정현희, "농촌마을 어메니티 자원의 속성별 가치 평가-농촌다움의 가치평가-", 농촌계획, 20(4), pp.243~251 (2014), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]
- 곽승준, "컨조인트 분석을 이용한 한강하구의 가치추정", 경제학연구, 54(4), pp.141~161 (2006), 한국경제학회
- 김태화, "농업 어메니티의 경제적 가치평가", 농업경영.정책연구, 46(4), pp.640~667 (2019), 한국농식품정책학회[DOI]
- Kim, T. H., "Analyzing the Impact of Agrophotovoltaic Power Plants on the Amenity Value of Agricultural Landscape: The Case of the Republic of Korea", Sustainability, 13, pp.1~16 (2021)
- Kim, T. H., "The Meaning of Introduction Public-interest Direct Payment System and Tasks", Life Science and Natural Resources Research, 29, pp.73~82 (2021)
- 김태화, "공익직불제의 정책효과 분석: 소득효과와 소득분배 효과를 중심으로", 농업경제연구, 63(1), pp.17~42 (2022), 한국농업경제학회
- Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior, "McFadden, D.", Frontiers in econometrics, ~ (1973)
- Ministry of Agriculture, "Food and Rural Affairs, Comprehensive Guidelines for Public-interest Direct Payment System", ~ (2020)
- Lancaster, K. J., "A new approach to consumer theory", Journal of Political Economy, 74, pp.132~157 (1966)
- 이춘수, "기후변화 대응 식량안보를 위한 지불의사 분석", 농업경영.정책연구, 40(4), pp.1037~1061 (2013), 한국농식품정책학회
- 이민우, "델파이 기법을 활용한 농촌 공익기능 분류 연구", 한국지역사회생활과학회지, 32(4), pp.715~729 (2021), 한국지역사회생활과학회
- Louviere, J. J., "On the Design and Analysis of Simulated Choice or Allocation Experiments on Travel Choice Modelling", Transportation Research Record, 890, pp.11~17 (1982)
- Louviere, J. J., "Design and Analysis of Simulated Consumer Choice and Allocation Experiments: a Method based on Aggregate Data", Journal of Marketing Research, 20, pp.350~367 (1983)
- OECD, "Multifuntionality, Toward an Analytical Framework", OECD, ~ (2001)
- RDA, "A Fact Finding Survey on Rural Tourism 2018, 2020", Rural Development Administration, ~ (2020)
- RDA, "A Fact Finding Survey on Rural Tourism 2020", Rural Development Administration, ~ (2022)
- Yang, S. R., "The Value of Agriculture", Rural Development Administration, ~ (2012)