GMO 정보 전달 방식이 소비자의 가치 인식에 미치는 영향
The Effects on Information Types of GMO for Consumers’ Value Perception
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
GMO labeling system in South Korea stipulates three labeling methods: GMO labeling, no labeling and Non-GMO labeling. Products labeled as Non-GMO are not allowed for unintentional commingling of GMO without tolerance. However, consumers vary their acceptance of Non-GMO label on the unintentionally commingled products and willingness to pay according to the mixing rate, rather than devalue the whole products as useless. Additionally, consumers do not believe that the acceptable mixing rate should be discriminated between non-labeled products, which allow up to 3% of unintentional GMO contamination, and Non-GMO labeled products. Information on unintentional GMO mixing mainly refers to the mixing rate, but the Non-GMO content remaining even after commingling is also important information. The decline in value is alleviated when consumers are exposed to positive information, such as Non-GMO content, rather than when exposed to negative information, such as the mixing rate. Loss Aversion Coefficient is relative depending on whether the information representing the loss is positive or negative. Information that a Non-GMO labeled product contains X% GMO is more sensitive than information that (100-X)% Non-GMO remains.
Abstract
GMO labeling system in South Korea stipulates three labeling methods: GMO labeling, no labeling and Non-GMO labeling. Products labeled as Non-GMO are not allowed for unintentional commingling of GMO without tolerance. However, consumers vary their acceptance of Non-GMO label on the unintentionally commingled products and willingness to pay according to the mixing rate, rather than devalue the whole products as useless. Additionally, consumers do not believe that the acceptable mixing rate should be discriminated between non-labeled products, which allow up to 3% of unintentional GMO contamination, and Non-GMO labeled products. Information on unintentional GMO mixing mainly refers to the mixing rate, but the Non-GMO content remaining even after commingling is also important information. The decline in value is alleviated when consumers are exposed to positive information, such as Non-GMO content, rather than when exposed to negative information, such as the mixing rate. Loss Aversion Coefficient is relative depending on whether the information representing the loss is positive or negative. Information that a Non-GMO labeled product contains X% GMO is more sensitive than information that (100-X)% Non-GMO remains.
참고문헌 (16)
- 차현주, "프레이밍(Framing) 이론 메타분석: 2010-2019 주요 학술지에 게재된 연구를 중심으로", 한국소통학보, 19(4), pp.119~148 (2020), 한국소통학회
- 정석창, "GM에 관한 소비자 수용성 모형: 국가간 비교분석을 위한 탐색적 고찰", 한국공공관리학보, 29(3), pp.227~255 (2015), 한국공공관리학회[DOI]
- Study on Medium and Long-term Development of Audit Methodology for Environment-friendly Agriculture, "Eco-friendly Agricultural Products Subsidy Management Committee", ~ (2018)
- 한재환, "GM농산물 표시기준의 비의도적 혼입률 감축에 따른 경제적 효과 -옥수수 식용유를 중심으로-", 농업경영.정책연구, 37(2), pp.303~322 (2010), 한국농식품정책학회
- 진현정, "GMO표시제 확대가 식품산업과 국내 경제에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구", 농업경영.정책연구, 36(2), pp.418~448 (2009), 한국농식품정책학회
- Korea Biosafety Clearing House, "Key Statistics related to Genetically Modified Organisms in 2022", ~ (2022)
- 김미숙, "유전자변형식품의 행정규제 이슈확산에 대한 정책적 쟁점 －GMO 표시제 도입을 중심으로－", 대한정치학회보, 22(1), pp.177~195 (2014), 대한정치학회
- 김영주, "유전자변형(GMO) 표시방법 프레이밍이 소비자의 위험지각과 구매의도에 미치는 영향", 소비자학연구, 30(6), pp.171~194 (2019), 한국소비자학회[DOI]
- Study on GMO Production and Distribution Status and Cost, "Benefit Analysis of GMO Labeling", Korea Rural Economic Institute, 2009
- A Study on the Farming Decision-making Process by the Perspectives of Behavioral Economics – focused on Garlic and Onion Farmers, "Lee, S. M.", ~ (2022)
- Non-GMO Project, "Non-Gmo Project Standard", ~ (2016)
- Tversky, A., "Prospect Theory : an Analysis of Decision Under Risk", Econometrica, 47(2), pp.263~292 (1979)
- Tversky, A., "Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions", The Journal Of Business, 59(4), pp.251~278 (1986)
- Tversky, A., "Advances in Prospect Theory : Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty", Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), pp.297~323 (1992)
- World Agriculture, "Major Issues on GMO Labeling", ~ (2013)
- 유병덕, "비의도적인 잔류농약 검출에 대한 소비자 인식 : 유기계란을 중심으로", 농업경영.정책연구, 45(4), pp.677~698 (2018), 한국농식품정책학회[DOI]