대학시설의 녹색건축인증 등급별 득점경향에 대한 조사연구
Study on the Trend Analysis according to Grade of G-SEED for University Facilities
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study analyzes the average acquisition ratio between the 1st and 4th grade and the distribution and characteristics of the acquisition between the assessment items based on the case of Green Building Certification System(GBCS) for the educational facilities on the university campus. By evaluating the difference between the best scored grade (Green 1st Grade) and the general grade (Green 4th Grade), we classified the cases where the difference between grades with little or big difference. By doing this, we were able to analyze the trend that were difficult to distinguish between difficult to score and an easy task. G-SEED should be used not only as a formal system for certifying certification, but also to provide environmentally-friendly technology for buildings as well as meeting market needs. To do this, it is necessary to further refine the evaluation criteria. In addition, it is necessary to establish a qualitative evaluation system by providing detailed criteria for items that are not distinguishable among grades. It is expected that this study will be used to improve the detailed evaluation items by analyzing trends in the average acquisition rate presented in this study.
Abstract
This study analyzes the average acquisition ratio between the 1st and 4th grade and the distribution and characteristics of the acquisition between the assessment items based on the case of Green Building Certification System(GBCS) for the educational facilities on the university campus. By evaluating the difference between the best scored grade (Green 1st Grade) and the general grade (Green 4th Grade), we classified the cases where the difference between grades with little or big difference. By doing this, we were able to analyze the trend that were difficult to distinguish between difficult to score and an easy task. G-SEED should be used not only as a formal system for certifying certification, but also to provide environmentally-friendly technology for buildings as well as meeting market needs. To do this, it is necessary to further refine the evaluation criteria. In addition, it is necessary to establish a qualitative evaluation system by providing detailed criteria for items that are not distinguishable among grades. It is expected that this study will be used to improve the detailed evaluation items by analyzing trends in the average acquisition rate presented in this study.
참고문헌 (13)
- "G-SEED" (2018)[URL]
- 현은미, "그린리모델링 건축물을 위한 녹색건축인증기준 개선방향에 대한 기초 연구", KIEAE Journal, 17(3), pp.51~58 (2017), 한국생태환경건축학회
- Kim, J., "Improving Assessment of External Environment for Green Standard for Energy & Environmental Design Certification according to Climate Change)", LHI journal, 8(3), pp.171~180 (2017)
- 조성우, "녹색건축인증 기준 변화에 따른 인증특성 분석 연구", 대한건축학회연합논문집, 19(4), pp.103~112 (2017), 대한건축학회지회연합회
- 김정화, "시스템 다이내믹스를 이용한 녹색건축인증제도 활성화 정책의 실효성 평가", 한국건설관리학회 논문집, 17(1), pp.28~39 (2016), 한국건설관리학회[DOI]
- 김지현, "기후·에너지 정책변화에 따른 녹색건축인증제도 개선방향 연구", 대한건축학회논문집, 32(12), pp.25~35 (2016), 대한건축학회[DOI]
- 염동우, "녹색건축 인증제도의 지속가능성 제고를 위한 평가항목 분석", 대한건축학회논문집, 32(9), pp.49~57 (2016), 대한건축학회[DOI]
- 장현숙, "녹색건축인증제도 진행과정의 문제점 및 개선방향 연구 - 업무시설 중심으로-", KIEAE Journal, 14(1), pp.91~99 (2014), 한국생태환경건축학회[DOI]
- Kwon, H., "A Survey to Improve the Green Building Certifications Responding to Climate Change", LHI journal, 4(4), pp.435~477 (2013)
- 이성옥, "공동주택 친환경건축물인증 평가항목별 득점현황 및 분석", 대한건축학회논문집, 29(12), pp.306~316 (2013), 대한건축학회
- 왕정준, "녹색건축 재인증제도의 개선방안에 관한 연구", KIEAE Journal, 13(6), pp.67~75 (2013), 한국생태환경건축학회[DOI]
- 윤요선, "선행연구 분석을 통한 녹색건축 인증제의 개선방향에 관한 연구 - 공동주택 부문을 중심으로", KIEAE Journal, 13(5), pp.31~42 (2013), 한국생태환경건축학회[DOI]
- 박임호, "학교건축에서의 친환경 기술요소 적용에 관한 연구", 한국농촌건축학회논문집, 14(1), pp.75~82 (2012), 한국농촌건축학회