본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

녹색건축인증에서 건물 용도별 에너지관련 인증 항목의 평가 결과 분석

Analysis of Evaluation Results of Energy-related Certification Items by Building Use in Green Building Certification (G-SEED)

1

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타공학

초록

In this study, we analyzed the evaluation results of energy-related certification items in green building certification (G-SEED) using certificated sampling cases. We reviewed the acquisition status and the limitation of these certification items and proposed improvement measures for G-SEED. This study dealt with a sample of 48 cases extracted from certified buildings in 2020 by stratified random sampling. Six certification items related to the energy efficiency of buildings were considered in this study. We analyzed the correlation of the total score with the points of items and the evaluation results of building use types. According to the results, the obtained points of energy-related certification items had a high contribution and impact on the certification grade of buildings in G-SEED. The higher the G-SEED certification grade, the higher the acquisition points of energy-related certification items. Residential buildings with 1st-grade, 2nd-grade, and 3rd-grade G-SEED certification obtained a building energy efficiency rating of grade 1 or higher, and non-residential buildings obtained a building energy efficiency rating of grade 1+ or higher. We found that 66.7% of G-SEED-certified residential buildings had energy source monitoring devices, and 43.5% of non-residential buildings got points in the certification item for energy monitoring and management devices. On the other hand, the certification items for testing, adjusting and balancing (TAB) and commissioning, lighting energy saving, and the plan for solar radiation control had a low level of application. Monitoring the operation status and revising the evaluation criteria in G-SEED is necessary to promote green buildings and carbon neutrality.

Abstract

In this study, we analyzed the evaluation results of energy-related certification items in green building certification (G-SEED) using certificated sampling cases. We reviewed the acquisition status and the limitation of these certification items and proposed improvement measures for G-SEED. This study dealt with a sample of 48 cases extracted from certified buildings in 2020 by stratified random sampling. Six certification items related to the energy efficiency of buildings were considered in this study. We analyzed the correlation of the total score with the points of items and the evaluation results of building use types. According to the results, the obtained points of energy-related certification items had a high contribution and impact on the certification grade of buildings in G-SEED. The higher the G-SEED certification grade, the higher the acquisition points of energy-related certification items. Residential buildings with 1st-grade, 2nd-grade, and 3rd-grade G-SEED certification obtained a building energy efficiency rating of grade 1 or higher, and non-residential buildings obtained a building energy efficiency rating of grade 1+ or higher. We found that 66.7% of G-SEED-certified residential buildings had energy source monitoring devices, and 43.5% of non-residential buildings got points in the certification item for energy monitoring and management devices. On the other hand, the certification items for testing, adjusting and balancing (TAB) and commissioning, lighting energy saving, and the plan for solar radiation control had a low level of application. Monitoring the operation status and revising the evaluation criteria in G-SEED is necessary to promote green buildings and carbon neutrality.

참고문헌 (14)

  1. 2021 G-SEED Annual Report, 2021. 12 (KICT 2021-127), "KICT", ~ (2021)
  2. 윤요선, "공동주택의 녹색건축인증(G-SEED) 취득현황 및 인증항목 특성 분석", 한국태양에너지학회 논문집, 42(6), pp.115~125 (2022), 한국태양에너지학회[DOI]
  3. 배철학, "녹색건축 인증기준 개정에 따른 공동주택 인증결과 및 특성 분석", 한국건축친환경설비학회 논문집, 14(5), pp.525~540 (2020), 한국건축친환경설비학회[DOI]
  4. Cho, D. W., "The Trend and Future Development Direction of G-SEED", The Magaine of the SAREK, 42(9), pp.18~26 (2013)
  5. 양관섭, "녹색건축인증제도에서 음환경분야의 등급 획득현황 분석 및 개선방안 고찰", 한국소음진동공학회논문집, 30(6), pp.659~672 (2020), 한국소음진동공학회[DOI]
  6. 장대희, "녹색건축인증 내 운영현황 분석을 통한 생태면적률 개선방안 제안", KIEAE Journal, 21(4), pp.11~16 (2021), 한국생태환경건축학회[DOI]
  7. 서성모, "기존 건축물의 녹색건축 활성화를 위한 녹색건축인증 현황 및 기준 개선에 관한 제언", 한국태양에너지학회 논문집, 42(1), pp.69~76 (2022), 한국태양에너지학회[DOI]
  8. 명일, "녹색건축인증기준에서 실내환경분야의 평가항목 분석", 대한건축학회논문집, 39(1), pp.217~224 (2023), 대한건축학회
  9. Lee, H. H., "A Study on the Improvement of Evaluation Criteria According to the Revision of Green Building Certification Criteria–Focused on Energy Criteria", 2019 Summer Annual Conference of SAREK, pp.929~932 (2019)
  10. 성순택, "녹색건축인증 평가에 에너지성능 부문이 끼치는 영향- 에너지성능 평가 부문과 타 부문과의 비교 -", KIEAE Journal, 18(3), pp.57~64 (2018), 한국생태환경건축학회[DOI]
  11. Kim, K. H., "Development of an Assessment Method for Energy Performance of Residential Buildings Using G-SEED in South Korea", Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 21(1), pp.133~144 (2022)
  12. 배철학, "공동주택의 녹색건축 예비인증, 본인증 득점현황 및 인증특성 비교 분석", 한국건축친환경설비학회 논문집, 14(6), pp.803~816 (2020), 한국건축친환경설비학회[DOI]
  13. 정영선, "2050 탄소중립 달성을 위한 건물부문 온실가스 감축 시나리오 연구", 대한건축학회논문집, 37(10), pp.189~197 (2021), 대한건축학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)