공동주택의 녹색건축인증(G-SEED) 취득현황 및 인증항목 특성 분석
Analysis of Certification Results and Items of G-SEED Multi-residential Buildings
1
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
G-SEED is a system that comprehensively evaluates the eco-friendliness of buildings. As a carbon reduction strategy in buildings, the role of G-SEED system is becoming increasingly important. In this study, the main revisions of G-SEED since 2016 are reviewed, and data related to certification results of multi-residential buildings are analyzed in detail. In addition, considerations for future revisions are reviewed. G-SEED has been reorganized six times since the 2016 revision, and only the 2016-2 version and 2016-6 version have been upgraded in difficulty. In particular, certification items for materials and resources have been strengthened. In the analysis of the certification results of multi-residential buildings, the score analysis by specialized field and the acquisition rate by certification items were analyzed. Energy and environmental pollution scored highest in the score analysis, while the ecological environment scored the lowest. Acquisition rate analysis revealed that 17 items were acquired at a level of 90%, and the lower five items were acquired at less than 30%. In addition, 17 items with a biased specific grade were identified through acquisition rate analysis. Based on these observations, the following issues need to be addressed in future revisions: 1) set the final grade and review the target score according to the level of difficulty for each specialization 2) review the existing required items or the mandatory items. 3) review whether to maintain certification items low acquisition rate. 4) review the level of difficulty adjustment within the underweight or overweight items with a specific grade.
Abstract
G-SEED is a system that comprehensively evaluates the eco-friendliness of buildings. As a carbon reduction strategy in buildings, the role of G-SEED system is becoming increasingly important. In this study, the main revisions of G-SEED since 2016 are reviewed, and data related to certification results of multi-residential buildings are analyzed in detail. In addition, considerations for future revisions are reviewed. G-SEED has been reorganized six times since the 2016 revision, and only the 2016-2 version and 2016-6 version have been upgraded in difficulty. In particular, certification items for materials and resources have been strengthened. In the analysis of the certification results of multi-residential buildings, the score analysis by specialized field and the acquisition rate by certification items were analyzed. Energy and environmental pollution scored highest in the score analysis, while the ecological environment scored the lowest. Acquisition rate analysis revealed that 17 items were acquired at a level of 90%, and the lower five items were acquired at less than 30%. In addition, 17 items with a biased specific grade were identified through acquisition rate analysis. Based on these observations, the following issues need to be addressed in future revisions: 1) set the final grade and review the target score according to the level of difficulty for each specialization 2) review the existing required items or the mandatory items. 3) review whether to maintain certification items low acquisition rate. 4) review the level of difficulty adjustment within the underweight or overweight items with a specific grade.
참고문헌 (16)
- MOLIT, "Land and Transportation Carbon Neutral Roadmap", ~ (2021)
- KEI, "Developing a Circular Economy Policy Roadmap for Achieving Carbon Neutrality", ~ (2021)
- 김경하, "ESG의 환경요소(E) 관련 제도적 개선방안 - 정보 공시기준 및 세법 규정을 중심으로 -", 환경법과 정책, 27, pp.55~91 (2021), 비교법학연구소
- 장대희, "녹색건축인증 내 운영현황 분석을 통한 생태면적률 개선방안 제안", KIEAE Journal, 21(4), pp.11~16 (2021), 한국생태환경건축학회[DOI]
- 서성모, "기존 건축물의 녹색건축 활성화를 위한 녹색건축인증 현황 및 기준 개선에 관한 제언", 한국태양에너지학회 논문집, 42(1), pp.69~76 (2022), 한국태양에너지학회[DOI]
- Isimbi, D., "A Study to Improve Indoor Environment Quality Evaluation Criteria for G-SEED", Architectural Institute of Korea, 42(1), pp.333~336 (2022)
- 윤요선, "녹색건축 인증제도 업무용 건축물 개정 전·후 인증결과 비교분석", 대한건축학회논문집, 34(8), pp.51~58 (2018), 대한건축학회
- 배철학, "녹색건축 인증기준 개정에 따른 공동주택 인증결과 및 특성 분석", 한국건축친환경설비학회 논문집, 14(5), pp.525~540 (2020), 한국건축친환경설비학회[DOI]
- "G-SEED Certification Status" (2022)[URL]
- 2016 G-SEED Annual Report, "KICT", ~ (2016)
- KICT, "Operational bylaws of G-SEED 2016-2", ~ (2018)
- KICT, "Operational bylaws of G-SEED 2016-3", ~ (2019)
- KICT, "Operational bylaws of G-SEED 2016-4", ~ (2019)
- KICT, "Operational bylaws of G-SEED 2016-5", ~ (2020)
- KICT, "Operational bylaws of G-SEED 2016-6", ~ (2021)
- MOLIT, "Notice of G-SEED", ~ (2016)
