본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

인터랙션 조형의 개념과 특질, 속성, 요소

Concept of Interaction Form and Its Qualities, Attributes, Elements

정의철|이태일
디자인융복합학회(구.한국인포디자인학회) (Society of Design Convergence)|2021.08|디자인융복합연구(구.인포디자인이슈) (Design Convergence Study)|제20권 제4호|pp. 15-30

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Interaction DesignInteraction AestheticsInteraction FormInteraction AttributesInteraction Elements
주제분류디자인

초록

인터랙션의 폭발적인 발전과 편재에도 불구하고 인터랙션의 조형성에 대한 개념적 기반은 여전히 미약하고 파편적이다. 따라서 본 연구는 인터랙션의 심미성과 관련된 논의 과정을 조망하여 ‘인터랙션 조형’ 개념을 정립하고, 인터랙션의 미적 속성에 관한 기존 연구 결과들을 종합하고 분류하여 대상으로서 인터랙션 조형의 구성 요소를 제시하고자 한다. 연구 결과, 기술적 자유도와 편재성이 증대한 환경적 변화로 인해 인터랙션 디자인은 사용성에서 심미성으로 관점과 개념의 확장이 이루어졌음을 알 수 있었다. “인터랙션 조형”은 인터랙션이 표현되는 물리적 형태는 물론 비물질적이고 비시각적인 형태를 미적으로 조직하는 행위 과정과 그 결과물을 포함한 개념으로 정의하였고, 인터랙션의 조형성이 물리적이고 시각적인 심미성 외에 감각성, 역동성, 물질성, 시간성, 공간성 등의 미감을 포함한다고 파악하였다. 기존 연구에서 도출된 속성들을 범주화하여 인터랙션의 조형을 구성하는 속성과 요소들을 인터랙션의 경험적 특질과 구분하여 파악하고, 그중 대상으로서 인터랙션의 조형을 구성하는 요소로써 움직임, 속도, 힘, 흐름, 감각, 재질, 공간, 시간을 도출하였다.

Abstract

In spite of the explosive development and ubiquity of interactive media, the conceptual foundation of interaction aesthetics seems weak at present. The study aims to examine the issues related to interaction aesthetics to suggest the concept of “interaction form”, and to analyze the results from various efforts to extract attributes of interaction form. The study found that the technological degree of freedom and ubiquity has expanded the viewpoint from usability to aesthetics. The study was able to define “interaction form” as the procedure of acts and its result to aesthetically organize the physical forms as well as non-physical and non-visual forms, and argue that interaction form includes not only the visual aesthetics but also other aspects of aesthetics such as sensuality, dynamics, materiality, temporality, spatiality. From the previous researches, the study separated the “attributes” and “elements” of interaction form from the quality of aesthetic experience, and extract the elements of interaction form as movement, flow, speed, force, material, sense, space, time.

참고문헌 (61)

  1. Dewey, J., "경험으로서 예술" (2018), 나남
  2. Dourish, P., "Where the Action Is" (2001), The MIT Press
  3. Laurel, B., "Computer As Theatre" (2014), Pearson Education Inc
  4. Norman, D. A., "Design of Everyday Things" (1988), Doubleday
  5. Norman, D. A., "Emotional Design: Why We Love(or Hate) Everyday Things" (2005), Basic Books
  6. Overbeeke, K., "Pleasure with Products, Beyond Usability" (2002), CRC Press
  7. Shusterman, R., "프라그마티즘 미학" (2010), 북코리아
  8. Alaoui, S. F., "Movement qualities as interaction modality", Designing Interactive Systems, pp.761~769 (2012)
  9. Baljko, M., "The aesthetics of emergence : Co-constructed interactions", ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 15(3), pp.1~27 (2008)
  10. Djajadiningrat, T., "Easy doesn’t do it : Skill and expression in tangible aesthetics", Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 11(8), pp.657~676 (2007)
  11. Frohlich, D. M., "Beauty as a design prize", Human-Computer Interaction, 19(4), pp.359~366 (2004)
  12. Hallnäs, L., "From use to presence : on the expressions and aesthetics of everyday computational things", Interactions, 9(4) (2002)
  13. Hassenzahl, M., "The interplay of beauty, goodness, and usability in interactive products", Human-Computer Interaction, 19(4), pp.319~349 (2004)
  14. Hassenzahl, M., "Aesthetics in interactive products : Correlates and consequences of beauty", Product Experience, 2008, pp.287~302 (2008)
  15. Haynes, J. D., "Information Technology and Aesthetics : Passive and Active Dimensions", Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 14(2) (2007)
  16. Heller, D., "Aesthetics and Interaction Design: Some Preliminary Thoughts", Interactions-HCI & Higher Education, 12(5), pp.48~50 (2005)
  17. Hepworth, S. D. J., "Magical Experiences in Interaction Design", Design, pp.22~25 (2007)
  18. Hornecker, E., "The role of physicality in tangible and embodied interactions", Interactions, 18(2), pp.19~ (2011)
  19. Hummels, C., "Vending Machine that Moves ? Designing for the Aesthetics of Movement-based Interaction", 1~8 (2011)
  20. Hummels, C., "Move to get moved: A search for methods, tools and knowledge to design for expressive and rich movement-based interaction", J. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput, 11(8), pp.677~690 (2007)
  21. Hummels, C., "In Search of Resonant Human Computer Interaction : Building and Testing Aesthetic Installations", Human-Computer Interaction, pp.399~406 (2003)
  22. Jung, H., "Metaphors, materialities, and affordances: Hybrid morphologies in the design of interactive artifacts", Design Studies, 53, pp.24~46 (2017)
  23. Khaslavsky, J., "Understanding the seductive experience", Communications of the ACM, 42(5), pp.45~49 (1999)
  24. Landin, H., "Digital myths and delusions : An approach to investigate interaction aesthetics", Digital Creativity, 19(4), pp.217~232 (2008)
  25. Lin, Y.-C., "Human-Computer Interaction" (2011), Springer
  26. Loke, L., "Moving and making strange: An embodied approach to movement-based interaction design", ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact, 20(1), pp.7:1~7:1 (2013)
  27. Löwgren, J., "Pliability As An Experiential Quality: Exploring The Aesthetics of Design", Artifact, 1(2), pp.85~95 (2007)
  28. Löwgren, J., "Five things I believe about the aesthetics of interaction design", The Study of Visual Aesthetics in Human-Computer Interaction, pp.1~8 (2008)
  29. Löwgren, J., "Toward an articulation of interaction esthetics", New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 15(2), pp.129~146 (2009)
  30. Lundgren, S., "Time, temporality, and interaction", Interactions, 16(4), pp.34~ (2009)
  31. Mazé, R., "Form and the computational object", Digital Creativity, 16(1), pp.7~18 (2005)
  32. Norman, D. A., "Introduction to This Special Section on Beauty, Goodness, and Usability", Human-Computer Interaction, 19(4), pp.311~318 (2004)
  33. Overbeeke, K., "Beauty in Usability: Forget about Ease of Use", Human-Computer Interaction, 19(4), pp.367~369 (2002)
  34. Overbeeke, K., "Beauty in Use", Human-Computer Interaction, 19(4), pp.367~369 (2004)
  35. Parkes, B., "Designing kinetic interactions for organic user interfaces", Communications of the ACM, 51(6), pp.58~65 (2008)
  36. Ross, P. R., "Designing behavior in interaction: Using aesthetic experience as a mechanism for design", International Journal of Design, 4(2), pp.3~13 (2010)
  37. Rozendaal, M. C., "Pleasantness in bodily experience: A phenomenological inquiry", International Journal of Design, 4(2), pp.55~63 (2010)
  38. Svanæs, D., "Kinaesthetic thinking : The tacit dimension of interaction design", Computers in Human Behavior, 13(4), pp.443~463 (1997)
  39. Tractinsky, N., "What is beautiful is usable", Interacting with Computers, 13(2), pp.127~145 (2000)
  40. Udsen, L. E., "The aesthetic turn : Unravelling recent aesthetic approaches to human-computer interaction", Digital Creativity, 16(4), pp.205~216 (2005)
  41. Vallgårda, A., "Giving form to computational things : Developing a practice of interaction design", Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 18(3), pp.577~592 (2014)
  42. Wiberg, M., "Computational compositions : Aesthetics, materials, and interaction design", International Journal of Design, 4(2), pp.65~76 (2010)
  43. Wright, P., "Aesthetics and experience-centered design", ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 15(4), pp.1~21 (2008)
  44. Alaoui, S. F., "From dance to touch", Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA ’11, pp.1465~ (2011)
  45. Christensen, M. S., "Introducing Excitability", Proceedings of the NordiCHI 2004 Workshop, pp.10~13 (2004)
  46. Diefenbach, S., "An Interaction Vocabulary. Describing the How Of Interaction", Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, pp.607~612 (2013)
  47. Djajadiningrat, T., "But how, Donald, Tell Us How?", DIS2002, pp.285~ (2002)
  48. Fogtmann, M. H., "Kinesthetic Interaction - Revealing the Bodily Potential in Interaction Design", Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Conference on ComputerHuman Interaction Designing for Habitus and Habitat, pp.89~96 (2008)
  49. Hassenzahl, M., "Experience Design: Technology for All the Right Reasons", Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics, 3(1) (2010)
  50. Huang, C.-C., "Temporality in interaction design", Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces - DPPI ’11, pp.1~ (2011)
  51. Ishii, H., "Tangible Bits: Towards Seamless Interfaces between People, Bits and Atoms", Proceedings of CHI '97, pp.1~8 (1997)
  52. Jung, H., "Form and materiality in interaction design", Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA ’11, pp.399~ (2011)
  53. Jung, H., "Digital form and materiality", Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction Making Sense Through Design - NordiCHI ’12, pp.645~ (2012)
  54. Kurosu, M., "Apparent usability vs. inherent usability", Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’95, 2, pp.292~293 (1995)
  55. Lenz, E., "Aesthetics of interaction", Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction Fun, Fast, Foundational - NordiCHI ’14, pp.628~637 (2014)
  56. Lim, Y., "Interactivity attributes", Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 09, pp.105~ (2009)
  57. Lim, Y., "Interaction gestalt and the design of aesthetic interactions", Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces - DPPI ’07, pp.239~ (2007)
  58. Lundgren, S., "Interaction-related Properties of Interactive Artifacts", Conference Proceedings of Ambience’11, pp.112~121 (2011)
  59. Petersen, M. G., "Aesthetic Interaction — A Pragmatist ’ s Aesthetics of Interactive Systems", DIS ’04 Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, 1, pp.269~276 (2004)
  60. Schiphorst, T., "Applying an Aesthetic Framework of Touch for Table-Top Interactions", Second Annual IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human-Computer Systems (TABLETOP’07), pp.71~74 (2007)
  61. Tractinsky, N., "Aesthetics and apparent usability", Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’97, pp.115~122 (1997)

관련 논문AI추천

상호작용 속성이 사용자 경험 차원에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증적 연구김영미, 류한영한국디자인트렌드학회 · 한국디자인포럼2011 · 제30호사용자 경험 증진을 위한 감성 품질 디자인 프레임웍에 관한 연구 －사용자 인터페이스 디자인을 중심으로－서종환, 이건표한국감성과학회 · 감성과학2010 · 제13권 제3호A Research on the Paradigm of Interaction Based on Attributes반영환, 샨슈야한국융합학회 · 한국융합학회논문지2021 · 제12권 제5호예술의 미적 개념 변화와 뉴미디어 아트 특성송은주, 정회경한국디자인트렌드학회 · 한국디자인포럼2011 · 제33호실물형 인터렉션 디자인 특성 분석: 과학관 체험 전시물을 대상으로김미정, 오명원, 조명은한국감성과학회 · 감성과학2012 · 제15권 제4호플랙서블 디스플레이 인터페이스의 형태요인노지혜, 류한영, 안신미, 정승은, 주은선한국디자인트렌드학회 · 한국디자인포럼2015 · 제48호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)

인공지능 기반 인슐린 처방 프로세스의 시각화 방향성 제안윤재영, 박윤하pp. 1-13현대 바이오디자인의 현상적 특성장성연pp. 31-46중국 고전 사가원림(私家园林)의 공간구성 특성에 관한 연구조은길, 셰나pp. 47-60환경조형물이 장소성 형성에 미치는 영향 연구 - 중국의 도시광장을 중심으로 -정쉔줴pp. 61-77수요응답형 자율주행 모빌리티 서비스의 승차단계에서 eHMI의 정보 구성과 디스플레이 위치에 따른 사용자경험 연구강현민, 최준호, 김시완pp. 79-92
원문 보기