A Research on the Paradigm of Interaction Based on Attributes
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The aim of this study is to demonstrate interaction as a describable field and tries to understand interaction from the perspective of attributes, thus building a theoretical to help interactive designer understand this field by common rule, rather than waste huge time and labor cost on iteration. Since the concept of interaction language has been brought out in 2000, there are varies of related academical studies, but all with defect such as proposed theoretical models are built on a non-uniform scale, or the analyzing perspective are mainly based on researcher’s personal experience and being too unobjective. The value of this study is the clustered resource of research which mainly based on academical review. It collected 21 papers researched on interaction paradigm or interaction attributes published since 2000, extracting 19 interaction attribute models which contains 174 interaction attributes. Furthermore, these 174 attributes were re-clustered based on a more unified standard scale, and the two theoretical models summarized from it are respectively focuses on interaction control and interaction experience, both of which covered 6 independent attributes. The propose of this theoretical models and the analyzation of the cluster static will contribute on further revealing of the importance of interaction attribute, or the attention interaction attribute has been paid on. Also, in this regard, the interactive designer could reasonably allocate their energy during design process, and the future potential on various direction of interaction design could be discussed.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to demonstrate interaction as a describable field and tries to understand interaction from the perspective of attributes, thus building a theoretical to help interactive designer understand this field by common rule, rather than waste huge time and labor cost on iteration. Since the concept of interaction language has been brought out in 2000, there are varies of related academical studies, but all with defect such as proposed theoretical models are built on a non-uniform scale, or the analyzing perspective are mainly based on researcher’s personal experience and being too unobjective. The value of this study is the clustered resource of research which mainly based on academical review. It collected 21 papers researched on interaction paradigm or interaction attributes published since 2000, extracting 19 interaction attribute models which contains 174 interaction attributes. Furthermore, these 174 attributes were re-clustered based on a more unified standard scale, and the two theoretical models summarized from it are respectively focuses on interaction control and interaction experience, both of which covered 6 independent attributes. The propose of this theoretical models and the analyzation of the cluster static will contribute on further revealing of the importance of interaction attribute, or the attention interaction attribute has been paid on. Also, in this regard, the interactive designer could reasonably allocate their energy during design process, and the future potential on various direction of interaction design could be discussed.
참고문헌 (25)
- H. Ishii, "Tangible Bits: Beyond Pixels", Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction, pp.18~20 (2008)
- Tom Djajadiningrat, "Tangible products: redressing the balance between appearance and action", Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 8(5) (2004), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Erik Stolterman, "Concept-Driven Interaction Design Research", Human–Computer Interaction, 25(2), pp.95~118 (2010), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- Stuart K. Card, "The keystroke-level model for user performance time with interactive systems", Communications of the ACM, 23(7), pp.396~410 (1980), Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)[DOI]
- O. J. Wobbrock, "Research contributions in human-computer interaction", Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2016)
- Lars Hallnäs, "From use to presence", ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 9(2), pp.106~124 (2002), Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)[DOI]
- D. Svanæs., "Kinaesthetic Thinking : The Tacit Dimension of Interaction Design", Computers in Human Behavior, 13(4), pp.443~463 (2016)[DOI]
- Stefano Parisi, "Material Tinkering. An inspirational approach for experiential learning and envisioning in product design education", The Design Journal, 20(sup1), pp.S1167~S1184 (2017), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- C. Crawford., "The Art of Interactive Design: A Euphonious and Illumination Guide to Building Successful Software" (2002), No Starch Press
- J. P. Djajadiningrat, "Interaction relabelling and extreme characters : Methods for Exploring Aesthetic Interactions", Proceedings of the conference on Designing interactive systems processes, pp.66~71 (2000)
- T. Djajadiningrat, "Tangible products : redressing the balance between appearance and action", Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 8(5), pp.294~309 (2004)[DOI]
- R. Hunicke, "MDA: A formal approach to game design and game research", Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Challenges in Game AI, 4(1), pp.1722~ (2004)
- J. Löwgren, "Thoughtful interaction design. A design perspective on information technology" (2004), MIT Press
- M. Rogala., "Towardsa theory of interactive art experience", pp.106~126 (2005), Computer graphics and interactive media
- Y. Lim, "Interaction gestalt and the design of aesthetic interactions", Proceedingsof the 2007 conference on Designing pleasurable products and interfaces, pp.239~254 (2007)
- S. Diefenbach, "An interaction vocabulary. Describing the how of interaction", CHIEA '13: CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems., pp.607~612 (2013)
- D. Saffer., "Designing Gestural Interfaces:Touch screens and interactive devices" (2009), O’Reilly Media, Inc
- Y. Lim, "Interactivity attributes: a new way of thinking and describing interactivity", Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp.105~108 (2009)
- Anxiety and Trust: And Other Expressions of Interaction, "H. Landin.", Chalmers University of Technology, ~ (2009)
- Kennon M. Sheldon, "What is satisfying about satisfying events? Testing 10 candidate psychological needs.", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(2), pp.325~339 (2001), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
- Marc Hassenzahl, "Needs, affect, and interactive products – Facets of user experience", Interacting with Computers, 22(5), pp.353~362 (2010), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
- C. Hummels, "In search of resonant human computer interaction: Building and testing aesthetic installations", International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (2003)
- Y. K. Lim, "Interaction gestalt and the design of aesthetic interactions", Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Designing pleasurable products and interfaces, pp.239~254 (2007)
- Sus Lundgren, "FEATURETime, temporality, and interaction", Interactions, 16(4), pp.34~37 (2009), Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)[DOI]
- Jonas Löwgren, "Toward an articulation of interaction esthetics", New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 15(2), pp.129~146 (2009), Informa UK Limited[DOI]