丁玲文学资本的重构与现代中国知识人的受难图谱
The Reconstruction of Ding Ling's Literary Capital and the Suffering Spectrum of Modern Chinese Intellectuals
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
丁玲的文学身份在历时性的变化中映射出二十世纪中国知识分子在政权漩涡里谋取权力转化的困境。从布迪厄场域理论视角看：她早期(1930年前)以《莎菲女士的日记》的姿态性书写建构起“性别化现代性资本”，成为左翼文坛上的新面孔；而她的延安时期(40年代)借由《讲话》之后的自我革变为《田保霖》，将批评性的文化资本置换为接受体制庇护的“政治忠诚资本”来重构自我价值；中华人民共和国成立后，政治资本（制度性身份、官方奖励）成为主导着她日后一切文学实践，并借助《太阳照在桑干河上》及管理者的位子登上制高点；到了1955年，丁玲的全部政治资本因反右而荡然无存——当年被认为是“忠贞的”的话语标签瞬间失去功效，其地位与人生被直接折损为“闲杂人员”。晚年复出后用“身患重疾”这样温婉的口吻指出“创伤”痛点，她始终从革命者、受害者、体制符号都浑身缺席的现实中跳脱不出来，丁玲生命史的核心即在于此，在那个政治元场域不仅实现了包括知识场域的文化资本在内的一切“意义形式”的系统性洗刷与覆盖，更决定了在夹缝式存在的细碎罅隙里要想身体化安然，就必须更加“精巧”地安排好生存之法。
Abstract
Ding Ling's literary identity reflects the challenges faced by Chinese intellectuals in the twentieth century as they sought power transformation amidst the political turmoil. From Bourdieu's field theory perspective, she constructed "Gendered Modernity Capital" with the pose of Lady Safi before 1930, becoming a new face in left-wing literature; her Yan'an period (in the 1940s) transformed critical cultural capital into "political loyalty" after the founding of the People's Republic of China. After returning in her later years, she gently pointed out the pain points of "trauma," always unable to escape the reality of revolutionaries, victims, and institutional symbols absent. This is at the heart of Ding Ling's life, where not only did she achieve systematic cleansing and coverage of all "meaningful forms" in the gaps.