식민지 말기 조선의 전시경제와 전쟁상식

Abstract

This article, focusing on changes in economic policy, I think I will look at the aspects of war common sense is built with the ‘dissemination of knowledge’. The arms race, because it implies the expansion of infinite productivity for victory, war causes a variation in the production relationship with the restructuring of the economic structure. Here, although the spread of ‘knowledge of war’ is important, colonial home that was completely secure the intellectual productivity is not the first place there. It does not have knowledge that is suitable for war be immediately calculated. It built a ‘war common sense’, in that it requires time and must focus on dissemination of knowledge of the authorities with changes in game situation. Transfer to wartime regime, it was forced and rapid disruption of the everyday common sense, and a new war common sense epistemological transformation. These changes were able to fundamentally accepted in Korea, because the reality has configured the common sense of totalitarianism as the logic of the undeniable situation “during the war”. Discourse which control power is spread by creating a social issue here is to conceal the harsh economic exploitation, it can grasp that there be a strategy to prevent the collapse of be sustained produced relationship. When propaganda books of authorities to spread, to grasp the economic policy and in mind as the “economic combination of structure and ideology”, “composition reflecting the dominant discourse of class power” is important. War that requested the sacrifice of all the people, brought even social equality? Reduced landowners and villagers of the gap is considerable, conflict between the class over the fairness of the overall war burden did not appear large. This media has been effectively controlled, also, the majority of people have proved that it is a poverty of the state. However, the fact that entrepreneurs such as “Kim Sung Soo” has grown into a large conglomerate benefited from the cantilever finance, was not well-known. After the liberation, workers that claimed the autonomy management of the factory, It is what was a sign of these realistic contradiction. In short, this article attempts to analyze the spread and common sense of the process of knowledge of the war in the comparison of economic policy. So we try to analyze the nature of economic inequality and war footing. Depiction of literature there is no choice but to imply a situation of economic reality to sudden change. Therefore literature is worth to be able to investigate the aspects of inequality that has been re-structured in a common sense of the process of economic logic.