유신체제와 검열, 검열체제 재편성의 동력과 민간자율기구의 존재방식

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to reconstruct the reorganization of the censorship system in the 1970s from the perspective of the structural dynamics of the Park Chung-hee regime's pseudo-hegemony domination, propaganda, and the dynamics of the censorship system, and to explore the status and function of censorship as a sub-mode of social control. The basis of the authoritarian rule of the Park Chung-hee regime in the 1970s was the permanentization of security ideology and state of national emergency. Socio-cultural policies were also deployed subordinate to these trends and directions. Censorship also undergoes changeable changes as it is used as a major means of propaganda and cultural control. At the depth and peak of censorship in the 1970s lies the legal censor, KCIA. The level and amplitude of censorship increased to the maximum in the wake of the law of prosecutive emergency, which was triggered as a policy means for the institutionalization of the all-out security system, and the Korean censor's total exhibition was completed. First, overall and offensive censorship was maximized through strengthening administration legislation. In the process, the mass production of media regulation, the full-scale implementation of decadence regulation, and the censorship stance that prioritized national interests were accompanied, and the emulsion of colonial censorship was revived. Second, while the target of control has reached a potential threat, the target object of censorship advances to a level that collapses the social and cultural foundation. Third, as the status of the private self-governing body during the law of prosecutive emergency is re-located, control over popular culture and arts is totalized. Because they wanted to use popular culture and art as a political means of all-out security based on legal organization, negative control had to prevail over the versatility of propaganda. However, despite the tangible results of coercive control over society and culture following full-scale censorship, the biggest obstacle that offset this was the sound people who aspired for liberal democracy. This is why the law of prosecutive emergency had to be extended indefinitely.