한중 외교 브리핑 담화 속 거절 화행의 감정이입과 감정차단 연구
Pragmatic Empathy and Pragmatic De-empathy of Refusal Speech Act in South Korean and Chinese Diplomatic Discourses
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Based on the perspective of pragmatic empathy and de-empathy, this study aims to explore similarities and differences of strategies and emotional models of the diplomatic refusal speech act between China and South Korea. Moreover, the study explains the motivations of the differences in emotional models from the perspective of cultural differences, diplomatic environment, and interpersonal rapport orientation. The results indicate that foreign ministry spokespersons of China and South Korea seldom use direct refusal strategies and for the sake of face-saving, tend to implement indirect strategies. However, there are differences in specific strategies. When implementing refusal speech acts, both parties prefer to use the pragmatic empathy model. Compared with its Chinese counterparts, the empathy models adopted by South Korean spokespersons are significantly higher than that of the de-empathy models. Suggestions are offered for Korean refusal speech act education from three aspects: pragmatic and cultural factors, indirect refusal techniques, and the use of corpus.
Abstract
Based on the perspective of pragmatic empathy and de-empathy, this study aims to explore similarities and differences of strategies and emotional models of the diplomatic refusal speech act between China and South Korea. Moreover, the study explains the motivations of the differences in emotional models from the perspective of cultural differences, diplomatic environment, and interpersonal rapport orientation. The results indicate that foreign ministry spokespersons of China and South Korea seldom use direct refusal strategies and for the sake of face-saving, tend to implement indirect strategies. However, there are differences in specific strategies. When implementing refusal speech acts, both parties prefer to use the pragmatic empathy model. Compared with its Chinese counterparts, the empathy models adopted by South Korean spokespersons are significantly higher than that of the de-empathy models. Suggestions are offered for Korean refusal speech act education from three aspects: pragmatic and cultural factors, indirect refusal techniques, and the use of corpus.
참고문헌 (25)
- 김한종, "역사교육의 이론과 방법", pp.260~310 (2006)
- 김지연, "TV 선거 토론 담화에 나타난 체면 위협 행위의 의사소통 양상 고찰 -형식적 기제를 중심으로-", 화법연구, (40), pp.1~25 (2018), 한국화법학회[DOI]
- 오진환, "한국인과 중국인의 거절 화행에 나타난 표현 대조 연구", 석사, 국어국문학과 한국어학전공, pp.2013
- 윤상실, "일본어 거절화행 양상 및 전략에 관한 고찰", 일본어학연구, (58), pp.83~99 (2018), 한국일본어학회[DOI]
- 이해영, "일본인 한국어 고급 학습자의 거절 화행 실현 양상 연구", 한국어교육, 14(2), pp.295~323 (2003), 국제한국어교육학회
- 전정미, "새터민의 말하기 능력 향상을 위한 화행 교육 방안 연구 - 거절하는 말하기를 중심으로 -", 우리말글, 49, pp.111~138 (2010), 우리말글학회
- 채춘옥, "한중언어에서 요청화행과 거절화행의 대조연구", 중어중문학, (62), pp.121~151 (2015), 한국중어중문학회
- 허수미, "‘감정이입’을 활용한 사회과 수업 실천 전략", 사회과교육, 51(3), pp.103~122 (2012), 한국사회과교육연구학회
- 崔竹山, "中韩拒绝策略对比研究", 当代教研论丛, 5, pp.23~ (2014)
- 洪岗, "中美新闻发言人拒绝策略对比研究", 外语教学与研究, 43(2), pp.209~320 (2011)
- 何自然, "言语交际中的语用移情", 外语教学与研究, 4, pp.11~15 (1991)
- 韩丹, "批评语用视阙下中美外交拒绝言语行为对比研究", 外语研究, 37(1), pp.19~24 (2020)
- 李海辉, "话语缓和的语用移情解读", 暨南学报(哲学社会科学版), 34(9), pp.117~123 (2012)
- 兰晓霞, "中国学习者韩国语“请求—拒绝”对话研究", 博士, pp.2013
- 苗蕻, "中美新闻发言人拒绝言语行为研究", 硕士, pp.2013
- 冉永平, "语用学: 现象与分析" (2006), 北京大学出版社
- 冉永平, "指示语选择的语用视点, 语用移情与离情", 外语教学与研究, 5, pp.331~337 (2007)
- 冉永平, "缓和语的和谐取向及其人际语用功能", 当代外语研究, 11, pp.4~77 (2012)
- 闫利芳, "中美例行记者会中发言人拒绝言语行为对比研究", 硕士, pp.2016
- 邹俊秀, "中韩拒绝言语行为的语用策略对比研究", 韩国语教学与研究, 2, pp.15~22 (2016)
- Beebe L., "Pragmatic transfer in ESL refusals: Developing communicative competence in a second language" (1990), Newbury House
- Chen, X., "Refusing in Chinese : Pragmatics of Chinese as native and target language" (1995), University of Hawai’i Press
- Hall, E., "Beyond culture" (1976), Doubleday
- Kuno, S., "Functional syntax anaphora-discourse and empathy" (1987), The University of Chicago Press
- Vischer, R., "On the optical sense of form : A contribution to aesthetics" (1873), Hermann Credner