기초학력 진단을 위한 듣기‧말하기 영역 평가 문항 개발
Development of listening and speaking area items in a diagnostic test for basic academic ability
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Development of listening and speaking area items in a diagnostic test for basic academic ability. Park., Seongseog, Lee, Gyeongnam and Kim, Seunghyun. <Abstract> Listening and speaking skills should be evaluated as part of basic skills. The evaluation framework was established based on nine components. Preliminary items were developed at four levels: third to fourth grade in elementary school (level 1), fifth to sixth grade in elementary school (level 2), first to third grade in middle school (level 3), and first grade in high school (level 4). Preliminary tests were conducted on a total of 212 students. As a result of the two-parameter item response model analysis, it was confirmed that 27.3% of the items at level 1, 31.3% at level 2, 34.8% at level 3, and 37.5% at level 4 did not meet the target difficulty and discrimination criteria. Thus, a modification was necessary. The future direction of the item modification for the main test was discussed.
Abstract
Development of listening and speaking area items in a diagnostic test for basic academic ability. Park., Seongseog, Lee, Gyeongnam and Kim, Seunghyun. <Abstract> Listening and speaking skills should be evaluated as part of basic skills. The evaluation framework was established based on nine components. Preliminary items were developed at four levels: third to fourth grade in elementary school (level 1), fifth to sixth grade in elementary school (level 2), first to third grade in middle school (level 3), and first grade in high school (level 4). Preliminary tests were conducted on a total of 212 students. As a result of the two-parameter item response model analysis, it was confirmed that 27.3% of the items at level 1, 31.3% at level 2, 34.8% at level 3, and 37.5% at level 4 did not meet the target difficulty and discrimination criteria. Thus, a modification was necessary. The future direction of the item modification for the main test was discussed.
참고문헌 (17)
- 2020년 국가수준학업성취도 평가 결과: 중학교, "구남욱", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.연구자료 ORM 2021-57-1 (2021)
- 2020년 국가수준학업성취도 평가 결과: 고등학교, "구남욱", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.연구자료 ORM 2021-57-2 (2021)
- 김평원, "말하기 평가의 분석 모형 연구", 박사, 국어교육, pp.2010
- 기초학력 보장을 위한 문해력, 수리력 진단도구 개발(Ⅰ): 문해력, 수리력의 수준별 성취기준 개발을 중심으로, "박선화", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.연구보고 RRI 2020-7 (2020)
- 박재현, "협력적 의사소통 능력 평가 틀 구안", 리터러시 연구, 10(6), pp.75~111 (2019), 한국 리터러시 학회[DOI]
- 박창균, "말하기 평가 방법의 활용 방안", 화법연구, (43), pp.1~24 (2019), 한국화법학회[DOI]
- 서울대학교 교육연구소, "교육학 용어사전" (1995), 하우
- 성태제, "문항반응이론의 이해와 적용" (2016), 교육과학사
- 성태제, "현대교육평가" (2019), 학지사
- 이경남, "기초학력 진단을 위한 듣기·말하기 영역의 성취기준 개발", 화법연구, (52), pp.89~121 (2021), 한국화법학회[DOI]
- 이창덕, "화법교육론" (2010), 역락
- 최영인, "화법 수업의 특성을 반영한 동료 평가 방안 탐색 — 성찰적 담화 분석 평가를 중심으로", 국어교육학연구, 56(3), pp.269~309 (2021), 국어교육학회[DOI]
- Baker, F. B., "문항반응이론 입문" (2019), 학지사
- Buck, G., "듣기 평가" (2013), 글로벌콘텐츠
- Goss, B., "Listening as information processing", Communication Quarterly, 30(4), pp.304~307 (1982)
- Luoma, S., "말하기 평가" (2013), 글로벌콘텐츠
- Paek, I., "Using R for Item Response Theory Model Applications" (2019), Routledge