北朝期 交通路를 통한 河北地方 白玉像의 地域性 考察
A Study on the Regional Characteristics of White Marble Sculptures in the Hebei Region, taking into Consideration the Northern Dynasties Traffic Roads
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
河北地方에서 주로 出土되고 있는 白玉像은 北朝期 佛敎신앙의 실태와 石窟 이외의 石造像의 造成傾向을 보여주는 좋은 실례라고 할 수 있다. 그 중 曲陽像과 臨漳像에 대해서는 선행연구 및 데이터가 축적되어 있으나, 다른 地域의 경우에는 단편적인 자료만이 남아있는 상황이었다. 本稿에서는 상기의 두 地域에서 보이는 도상상의 共通點과 相異點을 바탕으로 다른 여타 지역의 白玉像까지 광범위하게 검토해 白玉像의 제작배경을 당시 河北地方의 交通路를 통해 고찰하였다. 이러한 고찰을 통해, 北魏시대에는 太行山脈을 넘어 平城과 中山城을 연결하는 河北의 北部地域이 번영했지만, 東魏・北齊시대에는 太原과 鄴城을 연결하는 交通路의 발달로 常山地域이 교통의 요충지였음을 알 수 있었다. 白玉像의 출토지는 이러한 交通路와 그 주변의 요충지는 本稿에서 살펴본 白玉像의 出土地와도 밀접한 관련이 있었다. 그 중 그동안 제작 배경이 전혀 알려지지 않았던 藁城像의 경우, 藁城이 常山 옆에 위치하고 있는 지리적 사실을 고려할 때, 鄴城과 太原에서 유행한 樣式의 영향을 받은 것으로 추측할 수 있다. 즉 藁城像에 표현된 蓮花紋이나 雙樹光背 등에서 보이는 장식적인 表現과 透彫 기법은, 鄴城의 양식이 太原으로 전파되는 루트를 통해 전해진 것임과 동시에 역루트를 통해 太原에서 유행한 화려하고 귀족적인 양식이 藁城에도 전해진 것으로 볼 수 있다. 결론적으로 말하면 藁城은 거리상 鄴城 보다는 曲陽과 가깝지만, 白玉像은 鄴城과 太原의 樣式에 더 가깝다. 그 배경에는 藁城이 東魏, 北齊시대에 발달한 太原-藁城-鄴을 연결하는 常山路에 인접하고 있는 점과 관련성이 있었다. 이에 반해 曲陽은 常山路에서 벗어난 지리상의 요인에 기인한 것이기도 하다. 白玉像은 중국 전체에서 보면 河北全地域에서 광범위하게 출토되고 있는 것처럼 보이지만, 本稿의 고찰을 통해서, 白玉像 出土 지역은 交通路와 밀접한 관련을 보이고, 그 안에서의 樣式的 相異點은 河北地方의 交通路의 발달 및 쇠퇴와 관련하고 있음을 알 수 있었다. 즉 白玉像은 이러한 交通路를 통해 새로운 樣式의 傳播와 受容의 과정을 거쳐 小地域圈別로 특징적으로 발전하게 되었다. 앞으로는 교통로를 통한 지역간의 교류와 白玉像의 출토지역과의 상호관련성을 중심으로 新出土 白玉像을 포함하여 각국에 산재한 白玉像에 대해 체계적인 해석을 시도해보고자 한다.
Abstract
This article analyzes the regional characteristics of white marble sculptures excavated from the Hebei region, taking into consideration the northern dynasties traffic roads. Previous studies have focused on the white marble sculptures excavated from Quyang(曲陽), while only fragmentary reports on white marble sculpture from other regions have been published. Therefore, this article presents a broad analysis on the form and style depicted in white marble sculpture excavated from Linzhang(臨漳) and Gaocheng(藁城) as well as Quyang. The white marble sculptures from the Hebei regions such as Quyang, Linzhang and Gaocheng show the regional characteristics in the halos(光背) and bases decorated with Spirit Kings(神王像) Altarpiece in terms of form and style. While the white marble sculptures of Quyang are primarily characterized by boat-shaped halos(舟形光背), those from Linzhang feature a double-tree motif halo(双樹光背). In addition, the white marble sculptures in Gaocheng have both boat-shaped halos and double-tree motif halos as is seen in the Northern Qi Dynasty White Marble Altarpiece with Seated Buddhas Dated by Inscription to Heqing 1. On the other hand, Spirit Kings are not seen in the white marble sculpture excavated from Quyang and Gaocheng, and can be found primarily in the white marble sculpture of Linzhang. Therefore, in the Hebei regions, the double-tree motif halo and Spirit King are seen primarily in the white marble sculpture excavated from Linzhang, and the white marbles sculptures from Linzhang and Gaocheng are relatively large(approximately 1 meter long). The formal characteristics of the white marble sculptures of southern Hebei region excavated from Linzhang and the white marble sculptures of northern Hebei region excavated from Quyang illustrate that these sculptures were produced within a small region even within the Hebei region. On the other hand, despite its geographic proximity to Quyang, the white marble sculptures excavated from the Gaocheng area have characteristics similar to those excavated from Linzhang. This article presents historical background of sculpture production with consideration of the northern dynasties traffic roads. The northern dynasties traffic roads in the Hebei region were developed during the early Northern Wei period(北魏). These roads included Shatian road(沙泉道) connecting Pingcheng(平城) with Zhongshancheng(中山城), and the Southern route along Taixing mountain range(太行山脈). Later, in the Eastern Wei(東魏) and the Northern Qi Dynasties(北斉), Jing Xing road(井陘路) was developed, which connected Tai yuan(太原) with Ye(鄴, the capital city) and crossed the Taixing Mountain Range. Therefore, in the Hebei regions, the development of traffic roads by each of the northern dynasties was closely related to the locations of the aforementioned white marble sculptures. Specifically, Quyang, located along the traffic roads developed during the Northern Wei period, has many excavated white marble sculptures dated to the Northern Wei period. Linzhang, a capital of both the Eastern Wei Dynasty and the Northern Qi Dynasty, has excavated white marble sculptures after Eastern Wei Dynasty age. Gaocheng, located along the traffic roads connecting Taiyuan with Linzhang, has excavated white marble sculptures produced during the Eastern Wei Dynasty to the Northern Qi Dynasty. The prevalent styles in Taiyuan and Linzhang were likely introduced to Gaocheng through the traffic roads. The studies presented in this article indicate that Quyang, Linzhang and Gaocheng , three areas in Hebei regions, can be classified as a small region in terms of the form of white marble sculpture that is closely related to the development of traffic roads. I believe that such viewpoints will provide a different perspective on the diversity of the white marble sculptures of the Hebei style, coupled with the understanding of the regional characteristics of a small region, and furthermore, provide the standards for evaluating many of white marble sculptures from unknown locations and production sites.
참고문헌 (75)
- "The National Palace Museum Bulletin, vol. XIV", ~
- Yen Chüan-ying, "The Double Tree Motif in Chinese Buddhist Iconography, part one", pp.1~14 (1979)
- Yen Chüan-ying, "The Double Tree Motif in Chinese Buddhist Iconography, part two", pp.1~13 (1980)
- 강희정, "龍樹, 龍華樹, 連理木", 중국사연구, 35(35), pp.99~125 (2005), 중국사학회
- 故宮博物院, "曲陽造像" (2009), 紫禁城出版社
- 高瀬奈津子, "北朝末山西東南部の佛敎石窟, in 明大アジア史論集 5" (1999), 明治大學東洋史談話會
- 高雄義堅, "北魏における佛敎敎團の發達について(龍谷大學論叢", 龍谷學會, 297 (1931)
- 曲陽県志編纂委員會, "曲陽県志", pp.70~101 (1998), 新華出版社
- 김성희, "北魏의 河北 經營과 山西·河北間 交通路 修築", 역사학보, 198(198), pp.153~190 (2008), 역사학회
- 金申, "關於神王的探討", 敦煌學輯刊 (1995), 蘭州大學
- 那波利貞, "唐代の社邑に就きて, in 史林 第23卷, 第2·3·4號" (1938), 史學硏究會
- 大阪市立美術館, "中國の石佛─莊嚴なる祈り" (1995), 大阪市立美術館
- 東京國立博物館, "中國國寶展", 167~ (2000)
- 東京文化財硏究所, "太行山脈一帯に点在する佛敎石窟群の包括的保護計画策定に關する日中共同硏究", pp.50~ (2008), 東京文化財硏究所
- 羅福頤, "河北曲陽県出土石像淸理工作簡報", ~
- 劉景龍, "龍門石窟碑刻題記彙錄" (1998), 中國大百科全書出版社
- 李錫經, "河北省曲陽県修德寺遺址發掘記", 考古通訊, pp.34~44 (1955), 科學出版社
- 李裕群, "神王浮雕石佛座拓本考釋", 文物 (2010), 文物出版社
- 李靜傑, "田軍, 定州系白石佛像硏究", 故宮博物院院刊, pp.66~84 (1999), 文物出版社
- 林己奈夫, "中國古玉器總設" (1999), 吉川弘文館
- 樊子林劉友恒, "河北正定收藏的一批早期金銅像", 文物, pp.36~43 (1993), 文物出版社
- 保全, "西安文管處所藏北朝白石造像和隋鎏金銅像", 文物 (1979), 文物出版社
- "北魏佛敎史論考" (1998), 岡山大學出版部
- "佛敎信仰に基きて組織せられたる中晩唐五代時代の社邑に就きて(上·下)", 史林, 24(3) (1939), 史學硏究會
- 山崎宏, "隋唐時代における義邑及び法社に就て", 史潮, 3(2) (1933), 大塚史學會
- 山西省考古硏究所, "北齊東安王婁睿墓" (2006), 文物出版社
- 山西省地圖集編纂委員會, "山西省歷史地圖集", pp.205~ (2000), 中國地圖出版社
- 常青, "北朝石窟神王彫刻述略", 考古 (1994), 科學出版社
- 徐男英, "中国北朝期神王像の受容と変容について", 鹿島美術財団年報, (28) (2011), 鹿島美術財団
- 徐男英, "河北藁城出土の北齊河淸元年銘白玉二佛坐像について- 彌勒破坐銘の解釋を中心に", 美術史, 170, pp.313~330 (2011), 日本美術史學會
- 石家庄地區文化局文物普査組, "河北省石家庄地區的考古新發現", 文物資料叢刊 (1997), 文物出版社
- 石松日奈子, "北魏佛敎造像史の硏究", pp.186~ (2005), ブリュッケ
- 小野勝年, "入唐求法巡禮行記の研究", 鈴木学術財団, 4, pp.252~253 (1969)
- 松本文三郞, "支那佛敎遺物" (1919), 大鐙閣
- 松原三郞, "中國佛敎彫刻史論(本文編)", pp.3~86 (1995), 吉川弘文館
- 松原三郞, "中國佛敎彫刻史硏究-特に金銅佛及び石窟造像以外の石佛についての論考", pp.129~148 (1966), 吉川弘文館
- 松原三郞, "玉石像考-中国仏教彫刻の系譜として", 佛教藝術, 230, pp.18~22 (1997), 每日新聞社
- 神道明子, "鞏県石窟の諸神王像について", 早稲田大學大學院文學硏究科紀要, 10 (1983), 文學·藝術學編, 早稲田大学
- 楊伯達, "曲陽修德寺出土紀年造像的藝術風格与特征", 故宮博物院院刊, pp.43~52 (1960), 文物出版社
- 楊伯達, "埋もれた中國石佛の硏究-河北省曲陽出土の白玉像と編年銘文" (1985), 東京美術
- 王巧蓮, "介紹一件北魏太平眞君元年石造像", 文物春秋 (2000), 河北省文物局
- "魏書", 中華書局, ~ (1984)
- "魏書", 中華書局, ~ (1974)
- 劉建華, "河北黃驊縣出土北朝白石造像", 藝術史硏究, 10, pp.299~326 (2008), 中山大學出版社
- 殷光明, "試論北涼石塔基座像與神王", 敦煌硏究 (1996), 甘肅人民出版社
- 一方神王浮雕石臺座, "文物天地" (2004), 文物出版社
- 任繼愈, "定本中國佛敎史Ⅲ 南北朝時代", pp.721~ (1994), 柏書房
- 林保堯, "東魏武定元年銘石造釋迦五尊立像略考-二佛並坐與觀世音的圖像構成及其成立基礎", 藝叢, 筑波大學藝術學硏究誌, (4) (1986), 筑波大學
- 長廣敏雄, "曲陽發見の石佛について", 美術史, 49, pp.2~ (1963), 日本美術史學會
- 張麗敏, "定州市博物館收藏的一批漢白玉佛造像", 文物春秋, pp.43~50 (2002), 河北省文物局
- 張風英, "黃驊市博物館藏北朝石造像選介", 文物春秋 (2009), 河北省文物局
- 前田正名, "平城の歷史地理學的硏究", pp.205~225 (1979), 風間書房
- 前田正名, "三-五世紀における太行山脈東麓の地域構造に關する論考-住民構造を通じて", 立正大學敎養部紀要, (10), pp.21~ (1976), 立定大學敎養部
- 程紀中, "河北藁城県發現一批北齊石造像", 考古, pp.242~245 (1980), 科學出版社
- 鄭紹宗, "河北臨漳出土石刻造像記, in 華夏文明的形成与發展", pp.332~337 (2003), 大象出版社
- 趙秀榮, "北朝石窟中的神王像", 敦煌學輯刊 (1995), 蘭州大學
- 佐藤智水, "北朝造像銘考", 史學雜誌, 86(6) (1977), 史學會
- "中國における初期の邑義について(上·下)", 佛敎文化硏究所紀要, 45 (2008), 龍谷大學
- 中國佛敎彫刻史論(本文編), , pp.107~122 (1995), 吉川弘文館
- 中國社會科學院, "中國歷史地圖集 第四冊, 東晋十六國・南北朝時期" (1996), 中國地圖出版社
- 中國玉器全集編集委員會, "中國美術分類全集中國玉器全集1-6" (1993), 河北人民出版社
- 曾布川寬岡田健責任編集, "世界美術大全集東洋編第三卷三國南北朝" (2000), 小學館
- 村田治郞, "中國の帝都", pp.181~260 (1981), 綜芸舎
- 塚本善隆, "北朝佛敎史硏究, in 塚本善隆著作集第二卷", pp.643~655 (1974), 大東出版社
- 塚本善隆, "龍門石窟に現れたる北魏佛敎, in 支那佛敎史硏究 北魏編" (1942), 弘文堂
- 諏訪羲純, "中國中世佛敎史硏究", pp.251~, 大東出版社
- 太原市文物考古硏究所, "北齊婁叡墓" (2004), 文物出版社
- 太原市文物考古硏究所, "晉陽古城" (2005), 文物出版社
- 八木春生, "いわゆる十神王像について", 藝術硏究報, 21 (2000), 筑波大學藝術學
- 八木春生, "北齊時代の首都鄴における佛敎寺院造像に關する一考察", 藝術硏究報, 45, pp.61~85 (2004)
- 馮賀軍, "河北曲陽白石造像發願文硏究", 故宮院刊, pp.197~233 (2004), 紫禁城出版社
- 河南博物院, "河南佛敎石刻造像", pp.150~173 (2009), 大象出版社
- 河北臨漳県文物保管所, "河北鄴南城附近出土北朝石造像", 文物, pp.65~69 (1980), 文物出版社
- 韓偉, "對《河北藁城県發現一批北齊石造像》一文的几点意見", 考古, pp.200~ (1981), 科學出版社
- 後漢書, , 中華書局, ~
