미학으로서 정치와 ‘도래할’ 민주주의

Abstract

Based on the discussion of the division of senses/emotions, Rancière criticizes the police division of “what can be seen and what cannot, what can be heard and what cannot be heard, and those who have a share and those who do not” and so on. In this context, the ‘sensible division’ is inextricably linked to the question of art and aesthetics. In the view of Rancière, politics means the creation of a new democratic order of equality and a new sense. Aesthetics and art also mean creating new sensible experiences and sensible divisions for objects. In this context, the sensible division is inextricably linked to the question of art and aesthetics. From Rancière’s aesthetic perspective, the politics of art means changing people’s sensibilities, changing the standards of sensibility, and creating a new space and order for representative politics. In this context, the “sensible division” is inextricably linked to the question of art and aesthetics. From Rancière’s perspective, politics means creating a new democratic order of equality and a new sense of taste. Aesthetics and art also mean creating new sensible experiences and sensible divisions for objects. From Rancière’s aesthetic perspective, the politics of art means changing people’s sensibilities, changing In particular, Rancière’s politics calls for the creation of a new ‘sensible division’ between human and non-human beings, which would mitigate, dissolve, or overcome the “binary between human and non-human beings” of modern representative politics.