清代徒刑的常規與特例
The General and Special Regulations of Imprisonment in Qing Dynasty
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
傳統中國, 由『開皇律』底定的新“五刑”制度相沿千餘年不變, 其中, 徒刑地位輕重適中, 適用罪名極廣, 處罰範圍極大. 清代的徒刑在立法與司法實踐中既有常態規定, 也有例外與變通. 徒刑既是一種刑制, 也是一種量刑基準, 因此有五徒ㆍ准徒和總徒的區分. 其在適用主體上體現了旗民有別ㆍ階級特權ㆍ緣俗而治ㆍ矜恤弱者等特點; 同時根據犯罪主體和地域差異在徒罪審判方面予以分別管轄; 在執行過程中還對一些特定徒犯加以枷號或刺字. 然而, 清初熱審ㆍ赦免ㆍ贖刑和存留養親等制度的滲入給徒刑帶來了一定程度的廢弛. 還需指出的是, 徒刑在清末法制改革後被繼續保留下來, 說明古今中西對徒刑的認知存在一定共識.
Abstract
In traditional China, the new "Five Penalties" system, which were established by the Kai Huang Lv, has remained unchanged for more than a thousand years. Among them, the status of imprisonment is moderate, the applicable charges are very wide, and the scope of punishment is very large. In the legislative and judicial practice of Qing Dynasty, there were not only normal regulations, but also exceptions and adaptations. Imprisonment was not only a kind of punishment system, but also a kind of sentencing standard, so there were five apprentices, Zhun Tu (准徒) and Zong Tu (總徒). In the subject of application, it distinguishing between the banners and the common people, class privileges, governing by common customs, and caring for the disadvantaged groups; at the same time, according to the subject of crime and regional differences, it was governed separately in the trial of criminal acts; in the process of execution, it also gave some specific criminal acts a flail punishment or a thorn. However, the infiltration of the hot trial in the early Qing Dynasty, pardon, atonement and Cun Liu Yang Qin(存留養親)system caused a certain degree of relaxation. After the legal system reformation at the end of the Qing Dynasty, imprisonment has been kept, which shows that there is a certain consensus on the cognition of imprisonment between ancient and modern China and the West.
참고문헌 (25)
- 阿桂, "大清律例" (2015), 中華書局
- 王明德, "讀律佩觿" (2001), 法律出版社
- 薛允升, "讀例存疑點注" (1994), 中國人民公安大學出版社
- 祝慶祺, "刑案匯覽三編 (第1編)" (2004), 北京古籍出版社
- 黃六鴻, "福惠全書" (2018), 廣陵書社
- 張榮錚, "大清律例" (1993), 天津古籍出版社
- 錢大群, "唐律疏義新注" (2007), 南京師範大學出版社
- 中國政法大學法律古籍整理研究所, "中國歷代刑法志注譯" (1994), 吉林人民出版社
- "清代冕寧司法檔案全編", ~
- 宮宅潔, "中國古代刑制史研究" (2016), 廣西師範大學出版社
- 吉同鈞, "大清律講義" (2017), 知識產權出版社
- 楊一凡, "中國律學文獻" (2004), 黑龍江人民出版社
- 張晉藩, "中國法制通史" (1999), 法律出版社
- 程樹德, "九朝律考" (2000), 商務印書館
- 鄭秦, "清代法律制度研究" (2000), 中國政法大學出版社
- 陳顧遠, "中國法制史概要" (2017), 商務印書館
- 胡祥雨, "清代法律的常規化: 族群與等級" (2016), 社會科學文獻出版社
- 郭航, "中國古代刑事寬宥政策考察 -以老弱婦幼廢疾者為視角", 法學評論 (2017)
- 蘇亦工, "“八議”源流與腹邊文化互動", 法學研究 (2019)
- 蘇欽, "清律中旗人“犯罪免發遣”考釋", 清史論叢 (1992)
- 林乾, "清代旗民法律關係的調整 -以“犯罪免發遣”律為核心", 清史研究 (2004)
- 劉小萌, "八旗戶籍中的旗下人諸名稱考釋", 社會科學輯刊 (1987)
- 鄭秦, "清代地方司法管轄制度考析", 法律科學 (1987)
- 胡祥雨, "清代刑部與京師細事案件的審理", 清史研究 (2010)
- Hu, Xiangyu, "Reinstating the Authority of the Five Punishments: A New Perspective on Legal Privilege for Bannermen", Late Imperial China, 34(2) (2013)
