漢代 刑制改革과 贖刑ㆍ罰金刑의 변화
Reform of the criminal law and Changes of Retribution and Fine punishment in Han Dynasty
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The content of this article can be summarized as follows: First, in the case of fines during the Qin-Han period, there is a high likelihood that the three-tier system of [貲1盾] - [貲1甲] - [貲2甲] was directly inherited and transformed into the [罰金1兩] - [罰金2兩] - [罰金4兩] system. Regarding retribution (贖刑), during the transition from the Qin to the Han Dynasty, it is highly likely that the grades and amounts of retribution money (贖錢) were adjusted. Second, among various penalty names included in retribution (贖刑), 贖耐 and 贖黥 appear to have evolved from characteristics of alternative penalties to those of primary punishments since the Qin period. In particular, 贖耐刑 was a unique form of retribution that was almost perfectly characterized as a primary punishment during the Qin-Han period. However, other retribution penalties such as 贖死, 贖城旦舂, 贖宮, and 贖遷 retained stronger characteristics of alternative penalties rather than primary punishments until the middle of the Western Han Dynasty. Third, after the legal reform initiated during the reign of Emperor Wen of the Western Han Dynasty, the amounts of retribution money (贖錢) were recorded in the format of “罰金~兩,” which might give the impression that retribution and fines were integrated. However, this format arose due to the abolition of corporal punishment and the introduction of penal servitude, making it difficult to use retribution names as they were. The distinction between retribution and fines continued to exist even until the Wei-Jin period. Fourth, after the legal reform, it is likely that the daily wage standards for penal servitude to replace the repayment of fines and retribution money (贖錢) had to change. Generally, it is believed that the penal servitude equivalent to the 贖耐 penalty of 罰金12兩 was kept within one year, calculated based on a daily wage of 22~25 coins, in order to maintain a balance of penalties in the overall legal system.
Abstract
The content of this article can be summarized as follows: First, in the case of fines during the Qin-Han period, there is a high likelihood that the three-tier system of [貲1盾] - [貲1甲] - [貲2甲] was directly inherited and transformed into the [罰金1兩] - [罰金2兩] - [罰金4兩] system. Regarding retribution (贖刑), during the transition from the Qin to the Han Dynasty, it is highly likely that the grades and amounts of retribution money (贖錢) were adjusted. Second, among various penalty names included in retribution (贖刑), 贖耐 and 贖黥 appear to have evolved from characteristics of alternative penalties to those of primary punishments since the Qin period. In particular, 贖耐刑 was a unique form of retribution that was almost perfectly characterized as a primary punishment during the Qin-Han period. However, other retribution penalties such as 贖死, 贖城旦舂, 贖宮, and 贖遷 retained stronger characteristics of alternative penalties rather than primary punishments until the middle of the Western Han Dynasty. Third, after the legal reform initiated during the reign of Emperor Wen of the Western Han Dynasty, the amounts of retribution money (贖錢) were recorded in the format of “罰金~兩,” which might give the impression that retribution and fines were integrated. However, this format arose due to the abolition of corporal punishment and the introduction of penal servitude, making it difficult to use retribution names as they were. The distinction between retribution and fines continued to exist even until the Wei-Jin period. Fourth, after the legal reform, it is likely that the daily wage standards for penal servitude to replace the repayment of fines and retribution money (贖錢) had to change. Generally, it is believed that the penal servitude equivalent to the 贖耐 penalty of 罰金12兩 was kept within one year, calculated based on a daily wage of 22~25 coins, in order to maintain a balance of penalties in the overall legal system.
참고문헌 (16)
- 윤재석, "중국목간총람(상)" (2022), 주류성
- 冨谷至, "秦漢刑罰制度の硏究" (1998), 同朋舍
- 水間大輔, "秦漢刑法硏究" (2007), 知泉書館
- 朴健柱, "秦漢의 居貲贖債와 代贖・代役・代刑", 中國史硏究, 51 (2007)
- 오준석, "秦代 縣廷의 재정운용과 회계처리― 里耶秦簡을 중심으로 ―", 중국고중세사연구, (45), pp.85~134 (2017), 중국고중세사학회[DOI]
- 오준석, "遷刑에서 流刑으로 - 중국 고대 유배형의 변천과 특징 -", 중국사연구, (143), pp.1~29 (2023), 중국사학회
- 이성규, "秦・漢의 형벌체계의 再檢討 – 雲夢秦簡과 〈二年律令〉의 司寇를중심으로", 東洋史學硏究, 85 (2003)
- 임병덕, "『嶽麓秦簡』과 中國古代法制史의 諸問題", 법사학연구, (54), pp.7~50 (2016), 한국법사학회[DOI]
- 임병덕, "秦代의 罰金刑과 贖刑", 중국사연구, (100), pp.17~39 (2016), 중국사학회
- 임병덕, "秦에서 漢으로의 罰金刑과 贖刑의 變化와 그 性格", 동양사학연구, (134), pp.107~146 (2016), 동양사학회[DOI]
- 임병덕, "漢文帝 刑制改革과 刑罰制度의 變化 - 『荊州胡家草場西漢簡牘』자료를 중심으로", 동서인문, (18), pp.79~109 (2022), 인문학술원[DOI]
- 임병덕, "『荊州胡家草場西漢簡牘』과 漢文帝의 刑制改革", 중국사연구, (143), pp.31~58 (2023), 중국사학회
- 任仲爀, "秦漢律의 罰金刑", 中國古中世史硏究, 15 (2006)
- 始皇陵秦俑坑考古發掘隊, "秦始皇陵西側趙背戶村秦刑徒墓", 文物, 3 (1982)
- 劉智明, "胡家草場漢簡所見漢文帝時期贖刑調整", 重慶第二師範學院學報, 36(2) (2023)
- 角谷常子, "前近代中國の刑罰" (1996), 京都大學人文科學硏究所
