宋代 東아시아 海上貿易과 季節風 -高麗와 南中國 사이를 中心으로-
Marine Trade and Seasonal Wind in East Asia of Song Dynasty -In the center of Koryo and South China-
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this writing, in order to identify to use seasonal wind to marine traders of East Asia in Song Dynasty, I have analyzed in the center of the arrival in port of yaeseung(禮成港) of Song marine traders, the arrival of Koryo delegate from Song China, and the clearance records of diplomatic delegates. Consequently there were many cases of arrival Song marine traders coming into yaeseunghang(禮成港), generally from July to August of the lunar and the following months are May and June of lunar. Furthermore when I examined the return of Koryo delegates, mainly there were many case in May and June of lunar. Besides in clearance record from yaeseunghang(禮成港), there were many case in February, March, April, July and August. That Song marine traders and Koryo delegates arrived in May and July is interpreted to use the seasonal south(or south-west) wind of South China in spring like popular view. On the contrary, in the document which recorded the Koryo delegates left for South China, they mostly left in spring like February and March, and in fall like July and August. It means that they used east-north wind blowing in spring and fall, which is not recognized so far. Consequently it is different from accepted view that Song Marine traders used the north wind in winter to return to South China. Especially July and August of lunar are subtle season when it would blow south wind or east-north wind. So Song Marine traders came to Koryo in this season, reversely Koryo delegates would leave for South China. On this part, though it is necessary to investigate meteorological analysis, it assumed that marine traders would make a voyage, by judging the direction of wind. Up to date though it is understood that Song Marine traders came to Koryo once a year, actually they make a round trip twice a year frequently. On the other hand Koryo marine traders would go to and from South China, in this case as Koryo vessels were flat-bottomed ships which were slow, it is estimated that they may have gone to and from once a year.
Abstract
In this writing, in order to identify to use seasonal wind to marine traders of East Asia in Song Dynasty, I have analyzed in the center of the arrival in port of yaeseung(禮成港) of Song marine traders, the arrival of Koryo delegate from Song China, and the clearance records of diplomatic delegates. Consequently there were many cases of arrival Song marine traders coming into yaeseunghang(禮成港), generally from July to August of the lunar and the following months are May and June of lunar. Furthermore when I examined the return of Koryo delegates, mainly there were many case in May and June of lunar. Besides in clearance record from yaeseunghang(禮成港), there were many case in February, March, April, July and August. That Song marine traders and Koryo delegates arrived in May and July is interpreted to use the seasonal south(or south-west) wind of South China in spring like popular view. On the contrary, in the document which recorded the Koryo delegates left for South China, they mostly left in spring like February and March, and in fall like July and August. It means that they used east-north wind blowing in spring and fall, which is not recognized so far. Consequently it is different from accepted view that Song Marine traders used the north wind in winter to return to South China. Especially July and August of lunar are subtle season when it would blow south wind or east-north wind. So Song Marine traders came to Koryo in this season, reversely Koryo delegates would leave for South China. On this part, though it is necessary to investigate meteorological analysis, it assumed that marine traders would make a voyage, by judging the direction of wind. Up to date though it is understood that Song Marine traders came to Koryo once a year, actually they make a round trip twice a year frequently. On the other hand Koryo marine traders would go to and from South China, in this case as Koryo vessels were flat-bottomed ships which were slow, it is estimated that they may have gone to and from once a year.
참고문헌 (36)
- "開慶四明續志", ~
- "建炎以來繫年要錄", ~
- "高麗史", ~
- "寶慶四明志", ~
- "宣和奉使高麗圖經", ~
- "蘇軾文集", ~
- "續資治通鑑長編", ~
- "宋史", ~
- "『宋朝事實類苑』 (上海古籍出版社標點本)", ~
- "宋會要輯稿", ~
- "『歷代名臣奏議』 (明, 楊士奇等撰, 四庫全書本)", ~
- "嶺外代答", ~
- "『雲麓漫鈔』(叢書集成新編本)", ~
- "諸蕃志", ~
- "『籌海圖編』(四庫全書本)", ~
- "眞臘風土記", ~
- "萍洲可談", ~
- 단국대학교 동양학연구소, "『漢韓大辭典』", ~
- 金渭顯, "高麗史中中韓關係史料彙編" (1981), 食貨出版社
- 成尋, "參天台五臺山記", ~
- 陳垣, "增補二十二史朔閏表", 藝文印書館
- 足立喜六, "園仁, 『入唐求法巡禮行記』" (1970), 東洋文庫
- 金在瑾, "韓國船舶史硏究" (1984), 서울대학교 출판부
- 楊渭生, "宋麗關係史硏究", 杭州大學出版社 (1997)
- 李東華, "泉州與我國中古的海上交通" (1986), 學生書局
- 李昌憲, "宋代按撫使考" (1997), 齊魯書社
- 陳高華, "宋元時期的海外交易" (1981), 天津人民出版社
- 三克己, "續日宋貿易の硏究" (1975), 國書刊行會
- 金庠基, "麗宋貿易小考", 震檀學報, 7 (1964)
- 김영제, "高麗使節에 대한 北宋政府의 禮遇 - 神宗代 高麗使節의 使行旅程과 關聯하여 -", 중국사연구, (84), pp.81~110 (2013), 중국사학회
- 김영제, "『高麗史』에 나타나는 宋都綱 卓榮과 徐德榮― 그들이 宋側으로부터 高麗綱首라 불렸던 背景을 中心으로 ―", 동양사학연구, (126), pp.87~120 (2014), 동양사학회
- 김영제, "麗宋交易의 航路와 船舶", 역사학보, (204), pp.237~267 (2009), 역사학회
- 朴玉杰, "高麗來航宋商人과 麗․宋의 貿易政策", 대동문화연구, 32 (1997)
- 崔柄憲, "大覺國師義天의 渡宋活動과 高麗․宋의 佛敎交流-晋水淨源․慧因寺와의 관계를 중심으로-", 震檀學報, 71 (1991)
- 石文濟, "宋代市舶司的職權", 宋史硏究集, (7) (1974), 中華叢書
- 佐伯弘次, "大陸貿易と外國人の居留", よみがえる, 1 (1988), 平凡社
