梁啓超의 ‘중국적’ 근대 기획
Liang qi-chao’s Chinese-style modern scheme
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Liang qi-chao propelled reforms according to his view that the reform of system through modification is required to survive as a power. As failed his efforts, he decided to make new and young China and began to enlighten people. He believed the strength of the country depended on people’s dignity, which led him to people enlightenment for new citizen campaign. He opposed individualism which may disturb state building, and emphasized the liberty of group and country, admitting the dignity of monarch. He dreamed of the constitutional monarchy and never gave up that. By doing so, he thought the country could exist in the age of the survival of the fittest. Early 20th century, Westernization was the mainstream which could not go upstream in China. Seeing postwar Europe in his own eyes, Liang rejected the way of thinking of Nationalism and supported the society which respected the personality of people. Instead of declaring that Europeans’ dream called scientism or almighty science was failure, he tried supplementing love and beauty to democracy and science, which was his effort to tie spirit and material, East and West, and antiquity and modernityfor eclecticism of compromise and balance. That came to traditional moderation of China, and last he returned to united cosmopolitanism from evolutionary theory and nationalism. It was quite great that Liang influenced the birth of modern China and formation of modernism. Chinese people influenced from him felt primitive themselves and blazed up their passion for saving the country and renovation more strongly. All kind of the conventional fell down themselves in the process of propaganda and introduction of new knowledge and concepts, losing their divine light and non-violable dignity. It was the capability and significance of enlightenment that Liang qi-chao spreaded, He was the one who 'planned modern China'. From a view of Liang, Chinese modernity did not transcend nor fall behind Europe’s. China never borrowed others’ civilization by making its own and never took only the results of the system or ideas born in Europe. China took its own steps forward to modernity. That is, modernity of China was the non-Westernized Chinese-style and 'Chinese' modernity not returning to Confucian conservatism.
Abstract
Liang qi-chao propelled reforms according to his view that the reform of system through modification is required to survive as a power. As failed his efforts, he decided to make new and young China and began to enlighten people. He believed the strength of the country depended on people’s dignity, which led him to people enlightenment for new citizen campaign. He opposed individualism which may disturb state building, and emphasized the liberty of group and country, admitting the dignity of monarch. He dreamed of the constitutional monarchy and never gave up that. By doing so, he thought the country could exist in the age of the survival of the fittest. Early 20th century, Westernization was the mainstream which could not go upstream in China. Seeing postwar Europe in his own eyes, Liang rejected the way of thinking of Nationalism and supported the society which respected the personality of people. Instead of declaring that Europeans’ dream called scientism or almighty science was failure, he tried supplementing love and beauty to democracy and science, which was his effort to tie spirit and material, East and West, and antiquity and modernityfor eclecticism of compromise and balance. That came to traditional moderation of China, and last he returned to united cosmopolitanism from evolutionary theory and nationalism. It was quite great that Liang influenced the birth of modern China and formation of modernism. Chinese people influenced from him felt primitive themselves and blazed up their passion for saving the country and renovation more strongly. All kind of the conventional fell down themselves in the process of propaganda and introduction of new knowledge and concepts, losing their divine light and non-violable dignity. It was the capability and significance of enlightenment that Liang qi-chao spreaded, He was the one who 'planned modern China'. From a view of Liang, Chinese modernity did not transcend nor fall behind Europe’s. China never borrowed others’ civilization by making its own and never took only the results of the system or ideas born in Europe. China took its own steps forward to modernity. That is, modernity of China was the non-Westernized Chinese-style and 'Chinese' modernity not returning to Confucian conservatism.
참고문헌 (35)
- 梁啓超, "飮冰室合集" (1989), 中華書局
- 汪孟鄒, "科學與人生觀" (1973), 香港中文大學近代史料出版組
- 孟祥才, "梁啓超傳" (1980), 北京出版社
- 鐘珍維, "梁啓超思想硏究" (1986), 海南人民出版社
- 何幹之, "何幹之文集" (1989), 中國人民大出版社
- 宋仁, "梁啓超政治法律思想硏究" (1990), 北京新華書店
- 董方奎, "梁啓超與立憲政治" (1991), 華中師範大出版社
- 徐剛, "梁啓超傳" (2006), 廣東旅遊出版社
- 李桂柱, "中國古典入門" (1973), 삼성문화재단
- 김충렬, "三民主義ㆍ大同書ㆍ飮冰室文集" (1977), 삼성문화재단
- 민두기, "중국현대사의 구조" (1983), 청람
- 체스타탄, "중국현대정치사상사" (1990), 지식산업사
- T.W. 아도르노, "한줌의 도덕" (1996), 솔
- 허도학, "중국근대화 기수 梁啓超" (2000), 임방서원
- 이혜경, "천하관과 근대화론: 양계초를 중심으로" (2002), 문학과지성사
- 홍석표, "현대중국, 단절과 연속" (2005), 선학사
- 孫文, "三民主義" (2006), 홍신문화사
- 요시자와 세이치로, "내셔널리즘으로 본 중국 애국주의의 형성" (2006), 논형
- 徐剛, "중화유신의 빛 梁啓超" (2008), 이끌리오
- 조경란, "현대 중국 사상과 동아시아(단독 단행본)" (2008), 태학사
- 李澤厚, "중국근대사상사론" (2010), 한길사
- 윤여일, "내재하는 아시아" (2011), 휴머니스트
- 스펜스, "천안문" (2010), 이산
- 김상준, "유교의 정치적 무의식" (2014), 글항아리
- 閔斗基, "梁啓超 초기 사상의 구조적 이해", 역사학보, 68 (1965)
- 민두기, "중국근대 혁명운동의 연구" (1985), 일조각
- 溝囗雄三, "중국현대사의 구조" (1983), 청람
- 김춘남, "梁啓超의 國家思想", 동국사학, 21 (1987)
- 이명수, "梁啓超의 新民說 연구", 석사, 동양철학, pp.1989
- 윤혜영, "강좌중국사 6" (1989), 지식산업사
- 정귀화, "1923년 中國의 文化論爭: 科學과 玄學의 논쟁", 중국문제연구, 5 (1992)
- 김춘남, "자유주의 사조의 중국적 수용", 동국사학, 30 (2002)
- 허남진, "과학과 인생관(현학) 논쟁", 인문논총, 47 (2002)
- 허증, "1920년대 ‘과학․현학’ 논쟁과 ‘救亡’ 의식", 대구사학, 103, pp.239~278 (2011), 대구사학회
- 조봉래, "1920年代 ‘科學과 人生觀 論爭’에 관한 小考", 한국철학논집, (18), pp.295~318 (2006), 한국철학사연구회
