본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

魏晉南朝의 郊祀 主神 논쟁과 鄭玄 이해

A Study on the Controversy over the Sacrifice to the Heaven in Suburb(郊祀) and Understanding of Zhen Xuan(鄭玄) in the Wei-Jin-Nanchao period

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The controversy over the chief deity at the sacrifice to the heaven in suburb(郊祀) and the Mingtang(明堂) in the Wei-Jin-Nanchao period has been to the fore quite early in history of the national ritual systems. In earlier studies, the controversy over the chief deity at the suburban sacrifice to the heaven has been comprehended and evaluated according to the analysis framework based on such dichotomy of views as ‘Six Heavens’ of Zheng Xuan(鄭玄) and ‘Single Heaven’ of Wang Su (王肅). Breaking away from the conventional stereotype, one may need a new angle on the above controversy, as described in this paper. The main subject on the controversy over the chief deity was the relationship with Haotian-shangdi(昊天上帝), Shangdi(上帝) and Wudi(Five Heavenly Emperors, 五帝). Zheng Xuan considered Shangdi, the chief deity at the sacrifice to the heaven in suburb in January, to be Wudi. On the other hand, Haotian-shangdi was worshiped in round altar(圓丘) at winter solstice. The controversy over the same and different concepts posed in Haotian, Shangdi, Wudi and the Heaven(天) was developed during the Jin-Song(晉宋) period. However without accurate understanding of Zheng Xuan as the starting point of the controversy over the chief deity and its academic standard, it is inevitable that only false arguments from misreading and distortion remain. Some researchers quoting Zheng Xuan unwillingly distorted his original intention. But there were a few researchers solved the above controversy in respect of Zheng Xuan to the relation between Shangdi and Haotian, as a sticking points which Zheng Xuan remained. For example, Zheng Xuan thought that the Heaven(天) could be called variously and a suitable name should be selected according to the situation of the related people. From this view, one may deduce that while Haotian denotes the vital vigor(元氣) as the origin of all things full in the infinite space, Shangdi is an emphasized name as the presider supervising the growth and development of all things. This kind view of Zheng Xuan intactly appeared in the standpoint of Liu Hong(劉宏) in Song dynasty. According to Liu, ‘Heaven’ is too high and noble to be called as only one name. As the case may be, ‘Heaven’ is called sometime as Shangdi or Haotian. While all of the above names denoted ‘Heaven’, the different expression of ‘Heaven’ in the same sentence might be due to preventing the repetitive use of the same word. At that time, many people might also share the thoughts of Zheng Xuan and Liu Hong. Such intensifying controversy may be considered a phenomenon indicating the academic variety and depth at that time without any established theory.

Abstract

The controversy over the chief deity at the sacrifice to the heaven in suburb(郊祀) and the Mingtang(明堂) in the Wei-Jin-Nanchao period has been to the fore quite early in history of the national ritual systems. In earlier studies, the controversy over the chief deity at the suburban sacrifice to the heaven has been comprehended and evaluated according to the analysis framework based on such dichotomy of views as ‘Six Heavens’ of Zheng Xuan(鄭玄) and ‘Single Heaven’ of Wang Su (王肅). Breaking away from the conventional stereotype, one may need a new angle on the above controversy, as described in this paper. The main subject on the controversy over the chief deity was the relationship with Haotian-shangdi(昊天上帝), Shangdi(上帝) and Wudi(Five Heavenly Emperors, 五帝). Zheng Xuan considered Shangdi, the chief deity at the sacrifice to the heaven in suburb in January, to be Wudi. On the other hand, Haotian-shangdi was worshiped in round altar(圓丘) at winter solstice. The controversy over the same and different concepts posed in Haotian, Shangdi, Wudi and the Heaven(天) was developed during the Jin-Song(晉宋) period. However without accurate understanding of Zheng Xuan as the starting point of the controversy over the chief deity and its academic standard, it is inevitable that only false arguments from misreading and distortion remain. Some researchers quoting Zheng Xuan unwillingly distorted his original intention. But there were a few researchers solved the above controversy in respect of Zheng Xuan to the relation between Shangdi and Haotian, as a sticking points which Zheng Xuan remained. For example, Zheng Xuan thought that the Heaven(天) could be called variously and a suitable name should be selected according to the situation of the related people. From this view, one may deduce that while Haotian denotes the vital vigor(元氣) as the origin of all things full in the infinite space, Shangdi is an emphasized name as the presider supervising the growth and development of all things. This kind view of Zheng Xuan intactly appeared in the standpoint of Liu Hong(劉宏) in Song dynasty. According to Liu, ‘Heaven’ is too high and noble to be called as only one name. As the case may be, ‘Heaven’ is called sometime as Shangdi or Haotian. While all of the above names denoted ‘Heaven’, the different expression of ‘Heaven’ in the same sentence might be due to preventing the repetitive use of the same word. At that time, many people might also share the thoughts of Zheng Xuan and Liu Hong. Such intensifying controversy may be considered a phenomenon indicating the academic variety and depth at that time without any established theory.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. "史記", 中華書局標點本, ~
  2. "漢書", 中華書局標點本, ~
  3. "後漢書", 中華書局標點本, ~
  4. "三國志", 中華書局標點本, ~
  5. "晉書", 中華書局標點本, ~
  6. "宋書", 中華書局標點本, ~
  7. "詩經, 十三經注疏整理本" (2000), 北京大學出版社
  8. "尙書, 十三經注疏整理本" (2000), 北京大學出版社
  9. "周禮, 十三經注疏整理本" (2000), 北京大學出版社
  10. "禮記, 十三經注疏整理本" (2000), 北京大學出版社
  11. "春秋左氏傳, 十三經注疏整理本" (2000), 北京大學出版社
  12. "春秋穀梁傳, 十三經注疏整理本" (2000), 北京大學出版社
  13. 陳壽祺, "五經異義疏證" (2012), 上海古籍出版社
  14. 朴美羅, "中國 祭天儀禮 硏究 : 郊祀의례에 나타난 上帝와 天의 이중적 天神觀을 중심으로", 박사, 종교학, pp.1997
  15. 문정희, "진한 제례와 국가지배", 박사, 사학, pp.2005
  16. 甘懷眞, "皇權ㆍ禮儀與經典詮釋" (2003), 樂學書局
  17. 史應勇, "鄭玄通學及鄭王之爭硏究" (2007), 巴蜀書社
  18. 劉柏宏, "開創與影響: 王肅禮學義理及中古傳播歷程" (2009), 稻郷出版社
  19. 金子修一, "古代中國と皇帝祭祀" (2000), 汲古書院
  20. 金智淑, "唐 高宗期 南郊祀 主神의 變化와 政治", 중국고중세사연구, 10 (2003)
  21. 김선민, "高句麗建國神話에 대한 廣開土王陵碑와 中國正史의 비교 연구", 동방학지, (134), pp.1~36 (2006), 국학연구원
  22. 김선민, "『禮記』 「禮運」편에 나타난 禮와 天의 관계", 중국고중세사연구, (21), pp.71~104 (2009), 중국고중세사학회
  23. 김선민, "兩晉의 종묘제도와 ‘太祖虛位’", 동방학지, (160), pp.117~168 (2012), 국학연구원
  24. 甘懷眞, "鄭玄王肅天神觀的探討", 史原, 15 (1986)
  25. 張京華, "五帝名號凡例研究", 중국사연구, (93), pp.49~64 (2014), 중국사학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)