본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

언어학적 오해(misunderstandings)와 불통(miscommunications)에 대한 융합적 접근: 고의성과 비고의성 관점에서

An Integrated Approach to Linguistic Misunderstandings and Miscommunications: From the Perspective of Intentional and Non-intentional Case

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

The purpose of this study is to reconsider linguistic miscommunications and misunderstandings, which occur in marital conversations and conversations between parent and children in korea, in terms of intentional or non-intentional case. There have been two major problems in accounting for them in many previous studies: one is that two concepts have been randomly used without any criteria; the other most of studies have focused on non-intentional cases involved in mistakes, noise, cross-cultural value and etc. As an alternative for improving them, a special focus is laid on Han’s(2014) integrated framework built by the combination of action theory and pragma-linguistic approach. On the basis of Han’s framework, an attention is paid to analyzing a set of real data involved in family discourse. The results of this analysis are discussed in terms of six types of verbal-actions. Such an attempt will be helpful to understand how intentional language usage is employed in dynamic discourse context as well as anatomize why an agent commits intentional miscommunications in his/ her family context.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to reconsider linguistic miscommunications and misunderstandings, which occur in marital conversations and conversations between parent and children in korea, in terms of intentional or non-intentional case. There have been two major problems in accounting for them in many previous studies: one is that two concepts have been randomly used without any criteria; the other most of studies have focused on non-intentional cases involved in mistakes, noise, cross-cultural value and etc. As an alternative for improving them, a special focus is laid on Han’s(2014) integrated framework built by the combination of action theory and pragma-linguistic approach. On the basis of Han’s framework, an attention is paid to analyzing a set of real data involved in family discourse. The results of this analysis are discussed in terms of six types of verbal-actions. Such an attempt will be helpful to understand how intentional language usage is employed in dynamic discourse context as well as anatomize why an agent commits intentional miscommunications in his/ her family context.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. 이성범, "체면과 권리의 관점에서 본 부부 대화의 불통 및 오해", 한국어 의미학, 43, pp.133~158 (2014), 한국어의미학회
  2. Bach, K., "Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts" (1979), MIT Press
  3. Blum-Kulka, S., "Too Many Words: Length of Utterance and Pragmatic Failure", Studies in second language acquisition, 8(1), pp.165~180 (1986)
  4. Bratman, M. E, "Intention and Evaluation", Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 10(1), pp.185~189 (1987)
  5. Bratman, M. E., "What is Intention?", pp.15~31 (1990)
  6. Bratman, M. E., "Planning and the Stability of Intention", Minds and Machines, 2(1), pp.1~16 (1992)
  7. Bratman, M. E., "Shared Cooperative Activity", Philosophical Review, 101(2), pp.327~341 (1992)
  8. Bratman, M. E., "Shared Intention", Ethics, 104(1), pp.97~113 (1993)
  9. Brown, G., "Speakers, listeners, and communication; explorations in discourse analysis" (1995), Cambridge University Press
  10. Brown, P., "Politeness; Some universals in language usage" (1987), Cambridge University Press
  11. Chick, K, "The Interactional Accomplishment of Discrimination in South Africa", Language in Society, 14, pp.299~326 (1985)
  12. Clark, H. H., "Hearers and Speech Acts", Language, 58(2), pp.332~373 (1982)
  13. Clark, H. H., "Discourse production and comprehension" (1977), Ablex
  14. Coupland, N., "Miscommunication and Problematic Talk", pp.1~17 (1991)
  15. Culpeper, J, "Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness", Journal of Pragmatics, 25, pp.349~367 (1996)
  16. Descal, M, "In dialogue: An interdisciplinary Approach", pp.441~459 (1986)
  17. Erickson, F., "Talking down: Some Cultural Sources of Miscommunication in Inter-racial Interviews", pp.99~126 (1979)
  18. Goffman, E., "Essays on face-to-face behavior" (1967), Garden City
  19. Grice, H. P., "Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts", pp.41~58 (1975), Academic Press
  20. Grimshaw, A. D., "Mishearings, Misunderstandings, and other Nonsuccesses in Talk: A Plea for Redress of Speaker-oriented Bias", Sociological Inquiry, 50, pp.31~74 (1980)
  21. Grimshaw, A. D., "Selection and Labeling of Instrumentalities of Verbal Manipulation", Discourse processes, 3, pp.203~229 (1980)
  22. Günther, S., "German-Chinese Interactions: Differences in Contextualization Conversations and Resulting Miscommunication", Pragmatics, 3(3), pp.284~304 (1993)
  23. Han, S. H., "A Study of Intentional Miscommunications and Misunderstandings in Marital conversations: An Integrated Approach of Pragmatics and Action Theory", 박사, pp.2014
  24. Humphreys-Jones, C., "The Art of Listening", pp.43~54 (1986), Croom Helm
  25. Jefferson, G., "Studies in Social Interaction", pp.294~338 (1972)
  26. Milroy, L., "The art of Listening", pp.17~42 (1986), Croom Helm
  27. Pride, J. B, "Introduction. In Cross-Cultural Encounters: Communication and Miscommunication", 1~11 (1985)
  28. Scollon, R., "Athabaskan English Interethic Communication, Narrative, Literacy and Face in Interethnic Communication" (1981), Ablex
  29. Searle, J. R., "Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language" (1969), Cambridge Univ. Press
  30. Searle, J. R., "A Classification of Illocutionary Acts", Language in Society, 5(1), pp.1~23 (1976)
  31. Thomas, J. A., "Pragmatic Failure", 석사, pp.1981
  32. Tzanne, A., "Talking at Cross-Purposes: The dynamics of miscommunication" (1999), John Benjamins Publishing
  33. Zaefferer, D., "Understanding Misunderstanding: A proposal for an Explanation of Reading Choices", Journal of Pragmatics, 1, pp.329~346 (1977)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)