청자대우불일치 표현에 대한 고찰 -발화 의도 및 힘과 유대를 중심으로-
A Study of Mismatched Hearer Honorific Expressions -focus on Speaker Intent as well as Power and Solidarity-
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this research is to determine speaker intent as well as the forms of power and solidarity that act on that intent when mismatched hearer honorific expressions are used. To this end, the forms of fixed honorifics usage by the speaker and the hearer were divided into ‘cases when honorific expressions are not used, Ø+honorifics for the listener, referent honorifics+honorifics for the listener’. In addition, analysis was conducted from the perspective of power and solidarity regarding the change to ‘referent honorifics+Ø’ based on speaker intent. The results of the analysis showed that for speaker intent where power acted on mismatched hearer honorific expressions, intent was for asking permission/approval, permission/approval, rejection, request A·B, protest, criticism, sarcasm, gratitude, apology, and opinion. Power was shown to act owing to the dominance relationship from these intents or because of the nonreciprocal relationship between the speaker and the listener that is formed by the confrontational attitude of the speaker. Meanwhile, for the speaker intent where solidarity act, intents of request C and empathy were found. These intents can be explained through the creation of a reciprocal relationship by the friendly attitude of the speaker.
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to determine speaker intent as well as the forms of power and solidarity that act on that intent when mismatched hearer honorific expressions are used. To this end, the forms of fixed honorifics usage by the speaker and the hearer were divided into ‘cases when honorific expressions are not used, Ø+honorifics for the listener, referent honorifics+honorifics for the listener’. In addition, analysis was conducted from the perspective of power and solidarity regarding the change to ‘referent honorifics+Ø’ based on speaker intent. The results of the analysis showed that for speaker intent where power acted on mismatched hearer honorific expressions, intent was for asking permission/approval, permission/approval, rejection, request A·B, protest, criticism, sarcasm, gratitude, apology, and opinion. Power was shown to act owing to the dominance relationship from these intents or because of the nonreciprocal relationship between the speaker and the listener that is formed by the confrontational attitude of the speaker. Meanwhile, for the speaker intent where solidarity act, intents of request C and empathy were found. These intents can be explained through the creation of a reciprocal relationship by the friendly attitude of the speaker.
참고문헌 (21)
- 김동완, "日本語語用論" (2005), 울산대학교 출판부
- 유형선, "대화 전략에 관한 연구 -TV 드라마 ‘아줌마’를 중심으로-", 한국어학, (23), pp.149~178 (2004), 한국어학회
- 이선희, "韓国人日本語学習者の「不満表明」について", 日本語教育, 123, pp.27~36 (2004)
- 정하준, "親しみという丁寧さについて", 호남대학교 학술논문집, 17(1), pp.119~135 (1996)
- Brown, R., "Style in Language", pp.253~276 (1960)
- 内田らら, "会議におけるパワー行使と創発的ネットワーク", 言語文化と日本語教育, 20, pp.39~51 (2000)
- ウォンサミン·スリーラット, "不満表明とそれに対する応答に関する研究－日本語母語話者とタイ語母語話者を比較して－", 言語文化と日本語教育, 51, pp.11~20 (2016)
- 大竹裕也, "高齢者のための発話意図を考慮した対話システム", 日本感性工学会論文誌, 11(2), pp.207~214 (2012)
- 尾鼻靖子, "武装する敬語―非命題的アイロニー考察", 言語と文化, 23, pp.19~34 (2020)
- 蒲谷宏, "敬語表現ハンドブック" (2009), 大修館書店
- 菊地康人, "敬語" (1997), 講談社学術文庫
- 高梨信乃, "行為要求について:日本語教育における問題", 神戸大学留学生センタ-紀要, 17, pp.1~17 (2011)
- 滝浦真人, "ポライトネスから見た敬語,敬語から見たポライトネス:その語用論的相対性をめぐって", 社会言語科学, 11(1), pp.23~38 (2008)
- 因京子, "日本語のポライトネス:その制度的側面と語用論的側面", 韓日言語文化研究, 6, pp.35~66 (2005)
- トマス、J., "語用論入門-話し手と聞き手の相互交渉が産み出す意味-" (1998), 研究社
- 肥合智史, "皮肉検出のための皮肉の対象の推定", 信学技報, 118(210), pp.7~11 (2018)
- 日高水穂, "スピーチレベルシフトの表現効果-シナリオ「12人の優しい日本人」を題材に", 秋田大学教育文化学部研究紀要人文科学·社会科学, 62, pp.1~12 (2007)
- 姫野伴子, "行為指示型発話行為の機能と形式", 埼玉大学紀要, 33(1), pp.169~178 (1997)
- 藤原安佐, "社会的要因による「聞き手敬語」の使い分け: 話し手と聞き手との関係を中心に", 教育学の研究と実践, 1(0), pp.49~53 (2002)
- 牧原功, "不満表明·改善要求における配慮行動", 群馬大学留学生センター論集, 7, pp.51~60 (2008)
- 山梨正明, "發話行爲" (1986), 大修館書店