대화참여자 간 관계 변화에 따른 공격, 화해, 협조 화행 간 비교 화용 연구
A Comparative Pragmatic Study on Aggressive, Reconcilable, and Cooperative Speech Act depending on Transition of Relationship between Interlocutors
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to analyze how two types of speech acts would be realized in conflicted and in reconciled discourse contexts by tracing back an interlocutor’s relationship-transition from the conflicted relationship to the reconciled one. The focus of linguistic analysis is laid on comparing acknowledgement (acceptance or apology) with rebuttal (justification or denial) in two discourse settings, i.e., family and acquaintance one, from the perspective of Austin (1961), Culpeper (1996), and Brown & Levinson (1987). In addition, this study conducts action analysis in order to essentially comprehend how and why an interlocutor would choose acknowledgement or rebuttal according to his/ her relationships with the other party. At the end, Kincaid’s (1979) communication model provides us with a comprehensive understanding of some results found by the blending approach (Han 2014) in this study.
Abstract
This study aims to analyze how two types of speech acts would be realized in conflicted and in reconciled discourse contexts by tracing back an interlocutor’s relationship-transition from the conflicted relationship to the reconciled one. The focus of linguistic analysis is laid on comparing acknowledgement (acceptance or apology) with rebuttal (justification or denial) in two discourse settings, i.e., family and acquaintance one, from the perspective of Austin (1961), Culpeper (1996), and Brown & Levinson (1987). In addition, this study conducts action analysis in order to essentially comprehend how and why an interlocutor would choose acknowledgement or rebuttal according to his/ her relationships with the other party. At the end, Kincaid’s (1979) communication model provides us with a comprehensive understanding of some results found by the blending approach (Han 2014) in this study.
참고문헌 (26)
- Austin, J. L., "Philosophical Papers" (1961), Oxford University Press
- Blum-Kulka, S., "Cross-cultural Pragmatics:Requests and Apologies" (1989), Ablex
- Bratman, M. E., "Cohen, Morgan, and Pollack", pp.15~31 (1990), MIT Press
- Bratman, M. E., "Planning and the Stability of Intention", Minds and Machines, 2(1), pp.1~16 (1992)
- Brown, P., "Politeness; Some Universals in Language Usage" (1987), Cambridge University Press
- Culpeper, J, "Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness", Journal of Pragmatics, 25, pp.349~367 (1996)
- Culpeper, J., "Impoliteness Revisited: with Special Reference to Dynamic and Prosodic Aspects", Journal of Pragmatics, 35, pp.1545~1579 (2003)
- Goffman, E., "Interaction Ritual. Essays on face-to-face behavior" (1967), Penguin University Books
- Grice, H. P., "Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts", pp.41~58 (1975), Academic Press
- 한승훈, "(A)study of intentional miscommunications and misunderstandings in marital conversations : an integrated approach of pragmatics and action theory", 박사, 영어영문학과, pp.2014
- 한승훈, "청자의도(H-intentions)의 개념화와 방향성 연구: 가족 담화를 중심으로", 어학연구, 51(3), pp.815~841 (2015), 언어교육원
- Hancher, M, "The Classification of Cooperative Illocutionary Acts", Language in Society, 8(1), pp.1~14 (1979)
- 김경은, "화해사역을 위한 화해의 영성", 신학과 실천, (36), pp.447~478 (2013), 한국실천신학회
- The Convergence Model of Communication, "Kincaid, D. L.", East-West Center, ~, pp.East-West Communication Institute Paper N. 18 (1979)
- 이성범, "소통의 화용론: 커뮤니케이션에 대한 화용적 접근" (2015), 한국문화사
- Leech, G. N., "Principles of Pragmatics" (1983), Longman
- Leech, G. N., "The Pragmatics of Politeness" (2014), Oxford University Press
- Limberg, H, "Impoliteness and Threat Responses", Journal of Pragmatics, 41, pp.1376~1394 (2009)
- Mills, S., "Gender and Politeness" (2003), Cambridge University Press
- 노성동, "언어폭력 상처경험과 회복탄력성에 관한 연구: 부목회자를중심으로", 박사, pp.2014
- 박경선, "중학생의 완벽주의, 가족건강성, 학교생활만족도가 분노표현방식에 미치는 영향", 인간발달연구, 20(3), pp.57~80 (2013), 한국인간발달학회
- 박민정, "인간의 감정을 형상화 한 인체표현 연구: 희·노·애·락을 중심으로", 석사, 조소, pp.2003
- 박상식, "소년사범의 재범 감소를 위한 회복적 사법의 도입: 화해권고제도를 중심으로", 교정복지연구, (35), pp.153~182 (2014), 한국교정복지학회
- 손선주, "한국어 감정표현단어의 추출과 범주화", 감성과학, 15(1), pp.105~120 (2012), 한국감성과학회
- Thomas, J., "Meaning in interaction" (1995), Longman
- 왕립향, "한국어와 중국어의 '화' 관련 감정표현의 환유적 양상 대조 연구 : 신체 부위별 표현을 중심으로", 석사, 외국어로서의한국어교육학과 외국어로서의한국어교육전공, pp.2013