한·중 불평 화행의 비교문화 화용론 연구 -의미공식을 중심으로-
A Cross-cultural Pragmatic Study of Korean and Chinese Criticizing Speech Acts: A Focus on the Semantic Formulas.
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to compare the differences between Korean and Chinese native speakers' semantic formulas of criticizing speech acts by taking social status and social distance as variables. Unlike clearly defined speech acts such as apologizing, requesting and refusing, criticizing speech acts are usually accompanied by more than one illocutionary force, and their interpretations are often negotiable, therefore they are relatively complex. In this study, a total of 100 Korean and Chinese native speakers were recruited and asked to fill out a discourse completion test (DCT) containing 12 criticize-provoking scenarios. We use the DCT as the major instrument because it can lead to the most important part of the speech act under investigation, and we also use a semi-structured interview to supplement the investigation. Criticizing semantic formulas were divided into categories and analyzed in terms of their overall use across all the scenarios. When comparing the two groups, the KNS performed more clearly criticizing about the intimate relationship than the CNS. Also, KNS and CNS criticize about low-status strangers both clearly, but CNS criticize about low acquaintances less clearly, while KNS maintained the same consistency. And then such similarities and differences discussed from the culture specificity perspective.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to compare the differences between Korean and Chinese native speakers' semantic formulas of criticizing speech acts by taking social status and social distance as variables. Unlike clearly defined speech acts such as apologizing, requesting and refusing, criticizing speech acts are usually accompanied by more than one illocutionary force, and their interpretations are often negotiable, therefore they are relatively complex. In this study, a total of 100 Korean and Chinese native speakers were recruited and asked to fill out a discourse completion test (DCT) containing 12 criticize-provoking scenarios. We use the DCT as the major instrument because it can lead to the most important part of the speech act under investigation, and we also use a semi-structured interview to supplement the investigation. Criticizing semantic formulas were divided into categories and analyzed in terms of their overall use across all the scenarios. When comparing the two groups, the KNS performed more clearly criticizing about the intimate relationship than the CNS. Also, KNS and CNS criticize about low-status strangers both clearly, but CNS criticize about low acquaintances less clearly, while KNS maintained the same consistency. And then such similarities and differences discussed from the culture specificity perspective.
참고문헌 (27)
- 강현화, "한국어교육을 위한 불평표현 문형연구-불평화행과 인용표현의 관계를 중심으로-", 한말연구, (24), pp.5~31 (2009), 한말연구학회[DOI]
- 김정헌, "한일 거절표현 구조 일고찰 -의미공식을 중심으로-", 일본언어문화, (25), pp.143~162 (2013), 한국일본언어문화학회[DOI]
- 미즈시마 히로코, "한국어 불평 화행의 중간언어적 연구", 석사, 외국어로서의한국어교육, pp.2003
- 오상이, "불만표시 발화행위 : 독일인과 한국인 상호문화 비교", 중동교육연구, 53(2), pp.119~220 (2005), 경북대학교 사범대학부속중등교육연구소
- 이성범, "소통의 화용론" (2015), 한국문화사
- 이해영, "비교문화적 화용론의 관점에서 본태국인 한국어 학습자의 사과 화행 연구", 한국어교육, 27(3), pp.233~260 (2016), 국제한국어교육학회[DOI]
- 타나폰 빠리깜신, "태국인 한국어 학습자의 불평 화행 연구", 한국어와 문화, 25, pp.183~215 (2019), 숙명여자대학교 한국어문화연구소
- 혼다 토모쿠니, "한국어․일본어 불평 화행의 비교 문화 화용론적 연구", 국제어문, (45), pp.5~44 (2009), 국제어문학회
- 황선영, "한국인의 불평 화행 실현 연구 -20, 30대의 전략 및 표현 사용 분석을 중심으로-", 이중언어학, (83), pp.213~244 (2021), 이중언어학회[DOI]
- 劉森林, "語用策略與言語行爲", 外語教學, 3, pp.10~15 (2003)
- Austin, J. L., "How to do things with words" (1962), Oxford University Press
- Blum-Kulka, S., "Request and apologies : A cross-cultural study of speech act realization patterns(CCSARP)", Applies linguistics, 5(3), pp.196~213 (1984)
- Brown, P., "Politeness: some universals in language Use" (1978), Cambridge University Press
- Bond, M. H., "The psychology of the Chinese people", pp.213~266 (1986), Oxford University Press
- Chen, Y. S., "Intercultural pragmtics, 8-2", pp.253~278 (2011), De Gruyter Mouton
- Geert, H., "Culture's concequences" (2001), Sage Publications
- Golato, A., "Studying compliment responses : A comparison of DCTs and recordings of naturally occurring talk", Applied linguistics, 24, pp.90~121 (2003)
- Guest, G., "How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability", Field methods, 18(1), pp.59~82 (2006)
- Hall, E. T., "Beyond culture" (1976), Doublday
- Kecskes, I., "The oxford handbook of pragmatics", pp.400~411 (2017)
- Leech, G., "Principles of pragmatics" (1983), Longman Press
- Li, Y., "A cross-cultural pragmatic study of the speech act of complaining by native Thai and Chinese speakers", Kasetsart journal of social sciences, 40(3), pp.1~7 (2018)
- Olshtain, E., "Complaints: A study of speech act behavior among native and non-native speakers of Hebrew", The pragmatic perspective: selected papers from the 1985 international pragmatics conference, pp.195~208 (1987), John Benjamins Publishing
- Searle, J., "Speech acts" (1969), Cambridge University Press
- Thomas, J., "Cross-cultural pragmatics failure", Applied Linguistics, 4, pp.91~122 (1983)
- Trosborg, A., "Interlanguage pragmatics : requests, complaints and apologies" (1995), Mouton de Gruyter
- Wierzbicka, A., "English speech act verbs : a semantic dictionary" (1987), Academic Press Australia