본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

척도 모형을 이용한 극 선호 표현의 연구: ‘-지 않았다’와 ‘-었다’의 대조적 연어휘 분석

The research of Korean expressions with polarity preference based on Scalar Model Theory: Distinctive Collexeme Analysis of ‘V-chi ahn-ass-ta' and ‘V-ess-ta'.

김소희|강범모
한국언어학회 (The Linguistic Society of Korea)|2020.03|언어 (Korean Journal of Linguistics)|제45권 제1호|pp. 41-67|DOI 10.18855/lisoko.2020.45.1.003

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

negative polarity itemsdistinctive collexeme analysisscalar model theorypolarity preference expressions
주제분류언어학

초록

Kim, Sohee & Kang, Beom-mo. 2020. The research of Korean expressions with polarity preference based on Scalar Model Theory: Distinctive Collexeme Analysis of ‘V-chi ahn-ass-ta' and ‘V-ess-ta'. Korean Journal of Linguistics, 45-1, 41-67. This research studies Korean expressions with negative and positive polarity preferences based on the Scalar Model Theory (Israel 2011). Previous studies have mainly focused on negative polarity items of which licensing condition is in either negative or positive contexts. This research is distinct from PI(polarity items) researches in that it considers words that co-occur more frequently in either negative or positive contexts. Expressions with polarity preferences are words extracted from comparing negation construction context 'V-chi ahn-ass-ta' and symmetrical affirmation context 'V-ess-ta' using Distinctive Collexeme Analysis (Gries and Stefanowitsch 2004). Then, the research qualitatively analyzes the extracted expression using basic concepts of Scalar Model theory, conceptual scales, scalar model, and quantitative and information values. The results of the research are as follows. Negative polarity preference expressions tend to be interpreted based on the Scalar Model Theory. In contrast, positive polarity preference expressions have nothing to do with conceptual scales and the scalar model except for some degree adverbs. The scalar inference is a cognitive feature that is more engaged in negative contexts than positive ones. (Korea University)

Abstract

Kim, Sohee & Kang, Beom-mo. 2020. The research of Korean expressions with polarity preference based on Scalar Model Theory: Distinctive Collexeme Analysis of ‘V-chi ahn-ass-ta' and ‘V-ess-ta'. Korean Journal of Linguistics, 45-1, 41-67. This research studies Korean expressions with negative and positive polarity preferences based on the Scalar Model Theory (Israel 2011). Previous studies have mainly focused on negative polarity items of which licensing condition is in either negative or positive contexts. This research is distinct from PI(polarity items) researches in that it considers words that co-occur more frequently in either negative or positive contexts. Expressions with polarity preferences are words extracted from comparing negation construction context 'V-chi ahn-ass-ta' and symmetrical affirmation context 'V-ess-ta' using Distinctive Collexeme Analysis (Gries and Stefanowitsch 2004). Then, the research qualitatively analyzes the extracted expression using basic concepts of Scalar Model theory, conceptual scales, scalar model, and quantitative and information values. The results of the research are as follows. Negative polarity preference expressions tend to be interpreted based on the Scalar Model Theory. In contrast, positive polarity preference expressions have nothing to do with conceptual scales and the scalar model except for some degree adverbs. The scalar inference is a cognitive feature that is more engaged in negative contexts than positive ones. (Korea University)

참고문헌 (41)

  1. 강범모, "언어, 컴퓨터, 코퍼스언어학" (2011), 고려대학교출판부
  2. 강아름, "부사 ‘그렇게’의 극성 연구", 언어, 44(2), pp.145~169 (2019), 한국언어학회[DOI]
  3. 구종남, "국어 부정극어의 유형", 국어문학, 5(27) (2003)
  4. 구종남, "국어의 부정극어 허가자와 허가 양상", 한민족어문학(구 영남어문학), (59), pp.549~584 (2011), 한민족어문학회
  5. 김동성, "서술어", 비서술어 명사 구조의 생산성, 2012, pp.29(2), 403~434[DOI]
  6. 김소희, "부정극 경향의 한국어 표현 연구", 언어, 43(2), pp.175~200 (2018), 한국언어학회[DOI]
  7. 김윤신, "부정극어(negative polarity item)와 척도(scale)개념", 국정보과학회언어공학연구회 96 제8회 한글 및 한국어 정보처리 학술대회 발표논문집, pp.177~188 (1996)
  8. 남승호, "한국어 부정극어의 유형과 그 허가조건", 언어학, (22), pp.217~244 (1998), 사단법인 한국언어학회
  9. 래내커, 로널드, "개념·영상·상징: 문법의 인지적 토대" (2005), 박이정
  10. 박주형, "그렇게’ 의 정도부사적 용법 연구", 2017년 국어학회 여름학술대회 발표 자료집, pp.125~142 (2017)
  11. 신지연, "구어에서 지시어의 용법에 대하여", 어학연구, 29(3), pp.363~381 (1993)
  12. 신지연, "정도부사의 범주화 기준에 대하여", 어문학, 78, pp.71~87 (2002), 한국어문학회
  13. 알란 크루즈, "인지언어학" (2010), 박이정
  14. 이민행, "독일어의 어휘와 통사적 구성의 상호작용에 대한 연구 - 공연구조 분석 방법론의 적용", 독일언어문학, (46), pp.41~66 (2009), 한국독일언어문학회[DOI]
  15. 이정민, "부정과 부정어", pp.185~224 (2005), 한국문화사
  16. 이환묵, "국어의 극어와 화용상의 가정", 어학연구, 13(2), pp.115~127 (1977)
  17. 장영준, "부정과 부정어", pp.163~183 (2005), 한국문화사
  18. 토니 매캐너리, "코퍼스 언어학: 방법·이론·실제" (2018), 고려대학교 출판문화원
  19. 홍사만, "국어 특수조사 신연구" (2002), 역락
  20. Biber, Douglas, "Variation Across Speech and Writing" (1988), Cambridge University Press
  21. Bybee, Joan L, "From Usage to Grammar: The Mind's Response to Repetition", Language, 82, pp.711~733 (2006)
  22. Fauconnier, Gilles, "Pragmatic Scales and Logical Structure", Linguistic Inquiry, 6(3), pp.353~375 (1975)
  23. Giannakidou, Anastasia, "Licensing and Sensitivity in Polarity Items: from Downward Entailment to (Non)veridicality", Chicago Linguistic Society, 38, pp.1~21 (2002)
  24. Giannakidou, Anastasia, "Semantics (HSK 33.2)", pp.1660~1712 (2011), de Gruyter
  25. Goldberg, Adele E, "Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure" (1995), The University of Chicago Press
  26. Gries, Stefan Th, "A script for R to compute perform collostructional analyses", pp.5~ (2014)
  27. Gries, Stefan Th, "Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’", International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9(1), pp.97~129 (2004)
  28. Hoeksema, Jack, "The Expression of Negation", pp.187~224 (2011), de Gruyter
  29. 황주현, "Typology of NPIs in Korean: Variation and Licensing", 어학연구, 49(3), pp.829~856 (2013), 언어교육원
  30. Israel, Michael, "Polarity Sensitivity as Lexical Semantics", Linguistics and Philosophy, 19, pp.619~666 (1996)
  31. Israel, Michael, "The Grammar of Polarity: Pragmatics, Sensitivity, and The Logic of Scales" (2011), Cambridge University Press
  32. Kadmon, Nirit, "Any", Linguistics and Philosophy, 16(4), pp.353~422 (1993)
  33. Ladusaw, William A, ". Polarity Sensitivity as Inherent Scope Relations", Ph. D, pp.1979
  34. "R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing" (2019)[URL]
  35. Stefanowitsch, Anatol, "Constructions: Investigating the Interaction of Words and Constructions", International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8(2), pp.209~243 (2003)
  36. Stefanowitsch, Anatol, "Covarying Collexemes", Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 1(1), pp.1~43 (2005)
  37. Mikolov, Tomas, "Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality", Advanced in Neural Information Processing System, 26 (2013)
  38. Tomasello, Michael, "Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition" (2003), Harvard University Press
  39. "models.phrases – Phrase (collocation) detection" (2019)[URL]
  40. "표준국어대사전", 국립국어원[URL]
  41. 국립국어원, "21세기 세종계획 형태분석 말뭉치", 언어정보나눔터

관련 논문AI추천

부정극 경향의 한국어 표현 연구강범모, 김소희한국언어학회 · 언어2018 · 제43권 제2호부사 ‘그렇게’의 극성 연구강아름, 김소희한국언어학회 · 언어2019 · 제44권 제2호국어의 극어 형성에 대한 의미․화용론적 연구김윤신사단법인 한국언어학회 · 언어학2021 · 제89호부정극어에 관한 연구 - 영어와 한국어를 중심으로 -안남용한국현대언어학회 · 언어연구2014 · 제30권 제1호초점 보조사 ‘까지’의 역할: 화용적 척도와 영역 확장강아름한국언어학회 · 언어2021 · 제46권 제4호부정적 편향을 나타내는 ‘-을까 말까 하다’ 구문왕완지어문연구학회 · 어문연구2024 · 제122권

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)

‘-기는’ 용언 반복 구문에 대한 초점 분석김건희pp. 1-19색채어 {빨갛다}의 용법과 의미김광순pp. 21-40‘-라도’의 의미론김지은pp. 69-96Some Restrictions on Multiple Remnants in Right Dislocation and Fragments오세랑, 박범식pp. 97-117Korean Internally-Headed Relatives and Their Potentially Homophonous Constructions서샛별, 허세문, 박상희pp. 119-144
원문 보기