본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

Metonymy Avoidance in Korean

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the use of metonymic shortcuts in Korean and show that Korean displays a tendency, compared to languages such as English or French, to avoid metonymic extensions in the lexicon. This can be seen in the relative scarcity of typical examples of metonymies, such as material-to-product or place-to-activity meaning extensions, as well as in the absence of more marginal phenomena, such as antonomasia, a particular form of metonymy (proper name-to-object). Some morphological and grammatical features of the Korean language will be suggested that can explain this state of affairs.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the use of metonymic shortcuts in Korean and show that Korean displays a tendency, compared to languages such as English or French, to avoid metonymic extensions in the lexicon. This can be seen in the relative scarcity of typical examples of metonymies, such as material-to-product or place-to-activity meaning extensions, as well as in the absence of more marginal phenomena, such as antonomasia, a particular form of metonymy (proper name-to-object). Some morphological and grammatical features of the Korean language will be suggested that can explain this state of affairs.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. 김은일, "부호화 체계와 번역" (2010), 한국문화사
  2. 김정아, "은유와 환유에 토대한 어휘 의미 분석", 외국학연구, 11(1), pp.1~22 (2007)
  3. 오예옥, "환유현상으로서의 독일어 -er 명사의 다의어현상", 독일언어문학, (56), pp.1~24 (2012), 한국독일언어문학회
  4. 이석규, "우리말답게 번역하기" (2002), 역락
  5. 이성재, "환유와 화용적 추론", 프랑스 문화 연구, 2(13), pp.457~488 (2006), 한국프랑스문화학회
  6. 이종열, "국어 환유 표현의 사상적 특징과 의미 작용", 어문학, 76, pp.65~93 (2002), 한국어문학회
  7. 임지룡, "환유 표현의 의미특성", 인문논총, (55), pp.265~300 (2006), 인문학연구원
  8. 권연진, "The Study on Metaphor and Metonymy of Hand", 언어과학, 14(2), pp.195~215 (2007), 한국언어과학회
  9. Arnaud, P. J. L, "Détecter, classer et traduire les métonymies (français et anglais), In 8èmes Journées scientifiques du réseau "Lexicologie, terminologie, traduction", pp.15~17 (2009), Universidade Nova
  10. Brdar, M, "Metonymic coding of linguistic action in English, Croatian and Hungarian, In Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing", pp.241~266 (2003)
  11. Brdar-Szabó, R, "Referential metonymy across languages: What can cognitive linguistics and contrastive linguistics learn from each other?", International Journal of English Studies, 3(2), pp.85~105 (2003)
  12. Brdar, M, "Metonymies we live without, In Metonymy and metaphor in grammar", pp.259~274 (2009), Amsterdam
  13. Choo, Miho, "Handbook of Korean vocabulary" (1996), University of Hawaii Press
  14. Croft, W, "Syntactic categories and grammatical relations, In The cognitive organization of information" (1991), University of Chicago Press
  15. Fauconnier, G, "Espaces mentaux" (1984), Seuil
  16. Knoob, S, "Arguments for a non-morphological approach to Korean voice and diathesis, In Studies in Korean morpho-syntax: A functional-typological perspective", pp.53~80 (2005), Saffron Books
  17. On the importance of animacy and agency effects in the Korean diathesis system, "Knoob, S", SOAS-AKS, ~, pp.Working Papers in Korean Studies 4 (2008)
  18. Koch, P, "Lexical typology from a cognitive and linguistic point of view, In Language typology and language universals. An international handbook, Vol. 2", pp.1142~1178 (2001), de Gruyter
  19. Koch, P, "Aspects cognitifs d'une typologie lexicale synchronique. Les hiérarchies conceptuelles en français et dans d'autres langues", Langue française, 145, pp.11~33 (2005)
  20. Lakoff, G, "Metaphors we live by" (2003), The university of Chicago press
  21. Langacker, R. W, "Active zones", Proceedings of the tenth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, pp.172~188 (1984), Berkeley Linguistic Society
  22. Levin, B, "Verb classes and alternation" (1993), University of Chicago Press
  23. Müller-Gotama, F, "Grammatical relations, In A cross-linguistic perspective on their syntax and semantics" (1993), Mouton de Gruyter
  24. Na, Younghee, "The conventionalization of semantic distinctions", Papers from the 22nd Regional Meeting Chicago Linguistic Society, pp.166~178 (1986)
  25. Panther, K. -U, "Introduction: Metonymy across languages", Jezikoslovlje, 4(1), pp.5~9 (2003)
  26. Plank, F, "Verbs and objects in semantic agreement: Minor differences that might suggest a major one", Journal of Semantics, 3, pp.305~360 (1984)
  27. Sweep, J, "Metonymy without a referential shift. Adding evidence to the discussion", Linguistics in the Netherlands, pp.103~114 (2009)
  28. Warren, B, "Referential metonymy, In Stockholm" (2006), Almqvist & Wiksell International

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)