보조용언의 통합 관계 연구: ‘-어지-’와 ‘-게 되-’ 구문을 중심으로
The Study of Syntagmatic Order of Auxiliary Verb Constructions in Korean
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article aims to elucidate the syntagmatic order and constraints of auxiliary verb phrases in Korean. It discusses the structures and meanings of auxiliary verb phrases, focusing on the ‘-eci-’ and ‘-key toy-’ constructions. The aim is to explore the interrelation between their structures, meanings, and integration relationships. The ‘-eci-’ construction is divided into passive and inchoative constructions, both sharing the semantic feature of [-control]. The ‘-key toy-’ construction shares semantic similarities with the ‘-eci-’ construction but differs structurally and forms complex sentences. Furthermore, the semantic and syntactic similarities and differences between these two constructions become evident in their integration with other auxiliary verb constructions. For example, when the ‘-eci-’ construction is interpreted as passive, it maintains a fixed order, whereas the ‘-key toy-’ construction exhibits more flexibility in word order. However, the ‘-eci-’ and ‘-key toy-’ constructions can have common interpretations depending on their scope.
Abstract
This article aims to elucidate the syntagmatic order and constraints of auxiliary verb phrases in Korean. It discusses the structures and meanings of auxiliary verb phrases, focusing on the ‘-eci-’ and ‘-key toy-’ constructions. The aim is to explore the interrelation between their structures, meanings, and integration relationships. The ‘-eci-’ construction is divided into passive and inchoative constructions, both sharing the semantic feature of [-control]. The ‘-key toy-’ construction shares semantic similarities with the ‘-eci-’ construction but differs structurally and forms complex sentences. Furthermore, the semantic and syntactic similarities and differences between these two constructions become evident in their integration with other auxiliary verb constructions. For example, when the ‘-eci-’ construction is interpreted as passive, it maintains a fixed order, whereas the ‘-key toy-’ construction exhibits more flexibility in word order. However, the ‘-eci-’ and ‘-key toy-’ constructions can have common interpretations depending on their scope.
참고문헌 (26)
- 박재연, "보조용언 구성 ‘-어지-’의 양태 의미에 대하여", 國語學, (50), pp.269~293 (2007), 국어학회[DOI]
- 최현배, "우리말본" (1937), 정음문화사
- 최규수, "'되다'와 '지다'의 피동성에 관하여", 한글, (269), pp.101~134 (2005), 한글학회
- 정태구, "존재구문 ‘-어 있다’와 연쇄동사", 언어, 48(1), pp.159~183 (2023), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- Cinque, G, "Adverbs and Functional Heads : A Cross-Linguistic Perspective, New" (1999), Oxford University Press
- 도재학, "한국어에서의 ‘바람(wish)’ 개념의 실현 방책과 범주에 대하여", 어문논집, (78), pp.361~390 (2016), 민족어문학회
- Jackendoff, R., "Semantic Structures" (1990), MIT Press
- 전영철, "소위 이중피동문에 대하여", 언어학, (52), pp.79~101 (2008), 사단법인 한국언어학회
- 김성화, "국어의 상 연구" (1993), 한신문화사
- 김선영, "‘형용사+-게 되다’에 대한 일고찰", 언어, 40(1), pp.19~39 (2015), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- 김윤신, "한국어 기동 동사의 어휘 의미 구조와 생성적 기제", 어학연구, 41(3), pp.493~516 (2005), 언어교육원
- 기타무라 다다시, "한국어 피동 표현 연구" (2004), J&C
- 이정훈, "한국어 기술 생성 통사론" (2023), 역락
- 이정훈, "보조용언화의 통사론 -‘주다’ 구문을 중심으로-", 국어국문학, (203), pp.37~64 (2023), 국어국문학회
- 이정택, "현대 국어 피동 연구" (2004), 박이정
- 이상억, "국어의 사동･피동 구문 연구" (1999), 집문당
- 남신혜, "한국어 상적 보조용언 구 성의 용언 결합 양상" (2019), 신구문화사
- 남수경, "한국어 피동문 연구" (2011), 월인
- 박소영, "한국어 피동문에 나타나는 격 교체의 비대칭성에 대하여", 國語學, (67), pp.195~222 (2013), 국어학회[DOI]
- 손세모돌, "국어 보조용언 연구" (1995), 한국문화사
- 송복승, "국어의 논항구조 연구" (1995), 보고사
- 서정수, "수정 증보판 국어 문법" (1996), 한양대학교 출판원