Bound Noun kak in Korean
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper addresses the grammaticalization of a bound noun kak in Korean from the Internet sources. We observe different types of kak in Korean. First, a lexical noun kak which has a lexical meaning ‘angle’. Second,a bound noun kak which also has the same meaning, but it shows the typical characteristic such as obligatory aid from other phrase (e.g., the adnominal form of a complement). Third, in addition to these uses, we find a novel construction with a new functional meaning ‘likelihood/probability/expectation’(i.e., an Epistemic modal meaning) in the Internet. I assume that the bound noun kak merges in the position of N (reflecting the observation that kak has a lexical meaning) and subsequently moves to the position of small n (since kak has a functional meaning) following the bound noun kes given in Kim (2016). I also assume that this grammaticalization process is facilitated by a meme phenomenon in the Internet.
Abstract
This paper addresses the grammaticalization of a bound noun kak in Korean from the Internet sources. We observe different types of kak in Korean. First, a lexical noun kak which has a lexical meaning ‘angle’. Second,a bound noun kak which also has the same meaning, but it shows the typical characteristic such as obligatory aid from other phrase (e.g., the adnominal form of a complement). Third, in addition to these uses, we find a novel construction with a new functional meaning ‘likelihood/probability/expectation’(i.e., an Epistemic modal meaning) in the Internet. I assume that the bound noun kak merges in the position of N (reflecting the observation that kak has a lexical meaning) and subsequently moves to the position of small n (since kak has a functional meaning) following the bound noun kes given in Kim (2016). I also assume that this grammaticalization process is facilitated by a meme phenomenon in the Internet.
참고문헌 (18)
- Abe, Yasuaki, "Dethematized Subjects and Property Ascription in Japanese", Proceedings of the 1992 Asian Conference on Lnaguage, Information and Computation, pp.132~144 (1992), Thayhaksa
- 안정아, "의존명사 ‘수’와 ‘줄’의 의미연구", 어문논집, 52, pp.121~145 (2005)
- Bae, Sun-Hee, "NP Languages do not have NP-Ellipsis: Examination of Korean and Japanese", Ms, pp.2012
- Choe, Hyon-Sook, "Restructuring Parameters and Complex Predicates; A Transformational Approach", Ph.d, pp.1988
- Grimshaw, Jane, "Light Verbs and Θ–marking", Linguistic Inquiry, 19(2), pp.205~232 (1988)
- Ha, Iljoo, "NPI Licensing in Korean Modal Constructions", Japanese, 2007, pp.15, 312~323
- Hornstein, Nobert, "Movement and Control", Linguistic Inquiry, 30, pp.69~96 (1999)
- 정한데로, "‘형식명사+-요’ 구성에 관한 소고(小考)-인터넷 통신 언어를 중심으로-", 언어와 정보 사회, 13, pp.37~65 (2010)
- Kim, Tae Sik, "Small Projections and Grammaticalization in Korean", Ph.d, pp.2011
- Kim, Tae Sik, "Bound Noun swu in Korean", Studies in Generative Grammar, 24(2), pp.385~406 (2014)
- Kim, Tae Sik, "Bound Nouns, Ellipsis or Pro-form?", Studies in Generative Grammar, 26(1), pp.1~14 (2016)
- Kim, Tae Sik, "Bound Noun cwul in Korean", Studies in Generative Grammar, 31(4), pp.537~556 (2021)
- Oh, Min-seok, "Syntax and Semantics of Modern Korean Bound Noun ‘jul’", Emwunyenkwu, 43(1), pp.89~120 (2015)
- Roberts, Ian, "Syntactic Change : A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization" (2003), Cambridge University Press
- Saito, Mamoru, "Non-Nominative Subjects", pp.103~118 (2004), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Sohn, Keun-Won, "Negative Polarity Items, Scope, and Economy" (1996), Thayhaksa
- van Gelderen, Elly, "Grammaticalization as Economy" (2004), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- "Unbalance 15" (2020)[URL]