본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Semantic Implications Represented in DECIDING TYPE Verbs and Their Complements

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The purpose of this study explored Dixon's (1991) theoretical framework in order to understand school grammar on semantic principles focused on the meaning of verbs. It also tries to explain the semantic weakness of the school grammar learned in a high school or a university on Dixon's approach rather than to ignore the insight of other scholars' theories based on syntactic principles. It worked inductively to show educational implication that if students learn the semantic principles with syntactic properties of grammar, they will understand it more easily. So, as an example of semantic and syntactic relation between verbs and their complements, this study addressed the relation of a semantic slot of DECIDING TYPE verbs and their complements which students have memorized mechanically without semantic consideration. This study argues that complement clauses a verb may select must be explained to students on the semantic mapping between the meaning of the verb and the meaning of the complement construction for their better understanding of grammar.

Abstract

The purpose of this study explored Dixon's (1991) theoretical framework in order to understand school grammar on semantic principles focused on the meaning of verbs. It also tries to explain the semantic weakness of the school grammar learned in a high school or a university on Dixon's approach rather than to ignore the insight of other scholars' theories based on syntactic principles. It worked inductively to show educational implication that if students learn the semantic principles with syntactic properties of grammar, they will understand it more easily. So, as an example of semantic and syntactic relation between verbs and their complements, this study addressed the relation of a semantic slot of DECIDING TYPE verbs and their complements which students have memorized mechanically without semantic consideration. This study argues that complement clauses a verb may select must be explained to students on the semantic mapping between the meaning of the verb and the meaning of the complement construction for their better understanding of grammar.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. Bolinger, D. L., "Entailment and the meaning of structure", Glossa, 2, pp.119~127 (1968)
  2. Bowerman, M., "Learning a semantic system: What role do cognitive dispositions play?, In teachability of language", pp.101~108 (1989), Brookers
  3. Clark, E. V., "The young word maker: A case study of innovation in the child’s lexicon, In Language acquisition: The state of the art", pp.120~162 (1982), Cambridge University Press
  4. Dixon, R. M. W., "A new approach to English grammar on semantic principles" (1991), Clarenden Press
  5. Doughty, C., "Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition" (1998), Cambridge University Press
  6. Ek, J. A., "The student grammar of English" (1984), Basil Blackwell
  7. Fillmore, C. J., "The case for case, In Universals in linguistic theory", pp.262~282 (1968), Holt, Rinehart and Winston
  8. Fodor, J. A., "The present status of the innateness controversy, In .),Representations", pp.117~138 (1981), MIT Press
  9. Fodor, J. A., "The psychological unreality of semantic representations", Linguistic Inquiry, 6, pp.515~531 (1975)
  10. Fodor, J. A., "Against definition", Cognition, 8, pp.263~367 (1980)
  11. Gentner, D., "Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity vs. natural partitioning, In Language development. Vol. 2: Language, thought, and culture", pp.1~62 (1982), Erlbaum
  12. Gleitman, L. R., "The structural sources of verb meaning", Language Acquisition, 1, pp.3~55 (1990)
  13. Jackendoff, R. S., "Semantic structures" (1990), MIT Press
  14. Jespersen, O., "Essentials of English grammar" (1933), George Allen & Ltd.
  15. Katz, J. J., "The structure of a semantic theory", Language, 39, pp.170~210 (1963)
  16. Kiparsky, P., "Fact, In Progress in linguistics", pp.143~170 (1970), Mouton
  17. Kuh, H. A, "Regret for English" (1997), Geulmak
  18. Lakoff, G., "On generative semantics, In Semantics", pp.1~121 (1971), Cambridge University Press
  19. "Longman dictionary of applied linguistics" (2010), Longman
  20. "Longman dictionary of applied linguistics" (1985), Longman
  21. McCawly, J. D., "Grammar and meaning" (1973), Taishukan
  22. Pinker, S., "Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure" (1989), MIT Press
  23. Richards, J., "Longman dictionary of applied linguistics" (1985), Longman
  24. Ross, J. R., "Act, In Semantics of natural language", pp.43~72 (1972), Reidel
  25. Yang, I., "Linguistic explorations syntaxㆍsemanticsㆍpragmatics" (1993), Hanshin

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)