본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

식민지 시기의 일본 탐정소설의 한국어 번역 연구 — 방정환, 최병화, 최유범을 중심으로

The comparative study on Korean translation work of Japanese detective fictions in the Colonial period

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

With the works by ‘Lee haejo’ in 1908, detective fictions started to settle down in the Choson dynasty. After that, until the Independence of Korea in 1945, detective fictions had been continuously released and became an important aspect in Korean modern literature, and finally one of the cultural phenomena. However, the number of the creation of detective fictions was insignificant and that of translation had been merely 100 pieces including both short and long ones before the Independence. Even in translation works in the Colonial period, Japanese detective fictions were hardly found in the Choson dynasty. It is not natural when considering the fact that detective fictions were popularized enough to release a magazine dealing with detective fictions in Japan during that period. The various magazines created in Japan were means for detective fiction writers to make their debut and among them were Edogawa Rampo, the father of Japanese detective fictions and Korean writer, Kim Naesung who had studied in Japan at that time. Considering Japanese youth liked to read detective fictions and the number of works was considerable, it is not reasonable that translated Japanese detective fictions, which were well worth reading for the public, were not found in the Choson dynasty. Under this assumption, as a result of reviewing detective fictions during the Colonial period, there are two translated works from Japanese detective fictions and one work that has high possibility to be translated form a Japanese detective fiction. Focusing on influential writers and translators who played important roles in Korean detective literature where creation and translation of detective fictions were mixed together, the Korean-translated works of Japanese detective fictions and the impact will be dealt with in this thesis. The resources on creation and translation of detective fictions were mostly lost because of the cultural climate where detective fictions were not recognized as one form of literature at that time and the fact that two writers were children literature writers among the Korean writers who translated from Japanese detective fictions was very suggestive. The confirmation of original works is the key in detective works of the Colonial period but that is difficult. It would be easily confirmed that original works are foreign, when the names of authors were shown or the works showed they were translated but that is not the case. It is much needed to study and analyze Korean-translated detective fictionsclosely to establish proper translation works in Korea.

Abstract

With the works by ‘Lee haejo’ in 1908, detective fictions started to settle down in the Choson dynasty. After that, until the Independence of Korea in 1945, detective fictions had been continuously released and became an important aspect in Korean modern literature, and finally one of the cultural phenomena. However, the number of the creation of detective fictions was insignificant and that of translation had been merely 100 pieces including both short and long ones before the Independence. Even in translation works in the Colonial period, Japanese detective fictions were hardly found in the Choson dynasty. It is not natural when considering the fact that detective fictions were popularized enough to release a magazine dealing with detective fictions in Japan during that period. The various magazines created in Japan were means for detective fiction writers to make their debut and among them were Edogawa Rampo, the father of Japanese detective fictions and Korean writer, Kim Naesung who had studied in Japan at that time. Considering Japanese youth liked to read detective fictions and the number of works was considerable, it is not reasonable that translated Japanese detective fictions, which were well worth reading for the public, were not found in the Choson dynasty. Under this assumption, as a result of reviewing detective fictions during the Colonial period, there are two translated works from Japanese detective fictions and one work that has high possibility to be translated form a Japanese detective fiction. Focusing on influential writers and translators who played important roles in Korean detective literature where creation and translation of detective fictions were mixed together, the Korean-translated works of Japanese detective fictions and the impact will be dealt with in this thesis. The resources on creation and translation of detective fictions were mostly lost because of the cultural climate where detective fictions were not recognized as one form of literature at that time and the fact that two writers were children literature writers among the Korean writers who translated from Japanese detective fictions was very suggestive. The confirmation of original works is the key in detective works of the Colonial period but that is difficult. It would be easily confirmed that original works are foreign, when the names of authors were shown or the works showed they were translated but that is not the case. It is much needed to study and analyze Korean-translated detective fictionsclosely to establish proper translation works in Korea.

참고문헌 (40)

  1. 김유정, "필승 전, In 김유정 전집 2" (2003), 가람기획
  2. 북극성, "누구의 罪?, In 별건곤" (1926)
  3. 북극성, "怪男女 二人組, In 별건곤" (1927)
  4. 북극성, "紳士盜賊, In 신소설" (1930)
  5. 최유범, "순아 참살사건, In 별건곤" (1933)
  6. 최유범, "질투하는 악마, In 별건곤" (1933)
  7. 최유범, "K박사의 명안, In 별건곤" (1933)
  8. 최유범, "약혼녀의 악마성, In 별건곤" (1934)
  9. 최병화, "혈염봉, In 학생" (1930)
  10. 최병화, "미모와 날조, In 별건곤" (1932)
  11. 에도가와 란포, "악귀, In 에도가와 란포 전단편집 2" (2009), 두드림
  12. 呑海翁, "血染めのバット, In 幻影城" (1976)
  13. 김병철, "한국근대번역문학사 연구" (1998), 을유문화사
  14. 김소엽, "북극성의 신사도적", 동아일보, ~ (1930)
  15. 김영희, "일제 지배시기 한국인의 신문접촉 경향", 한국언론학보, 46(1), pp.2~71 (2002), 한국언론학회
  16. 김지영, "'탐정', '기괴' 개념을 통해 본 한국 탐정소설의 형성 과정", 현대문학이론연구, (41), pp.93~125 (2010), 현대문학이론학회
  17. 김창식, "추리 소설 형성기의 실상과 김내성의 『마인』, In 추리소설이란 무엇인가?" (1997), 국학자원
  18. 박광규, "식민지 시기 아동문학가의 탐정소설", 계간미스테리, (겨울) (2011), 청어람
  19. 박성태, "조선후기 송사소설의 유형과 전개양상 연구", 박사, pp.2005
  20. 박진영, "번역과 번안의 시대" (2011), 소명출판
  21. 염희경, "소파 방정환 연구", 박사, 국문과, pp.2007
  22. 오혜진, "1930년대 한국 추리소설 연구" (2007), 어문학사
  23. 오혜진, "근대 추리소설의 기원 연구", 한민족문화연구, (29), pp.175~206 (2009), 한민족문화학회
  24. 이가형, "미스터리 문학의 세계", 독서신문, ~ (1975)
  25. 이가형, "한국과 셔얼록 호움즈 탐정", 현대문학 (1973)
  26. 이선해, "방정환 동화의 창작방법 연구 : 탐정소설을 중심으로", 석사, 문예창작학과, pp.2007
  27. 이정옥, "송사소설계 추리소설과 정탐소설계 추리소설 비교 연구", 대중서사연구, (21), pp.239~277 (2009), 대중서사학회
  28. 임성래, "개화기의 추리소설 쌍옥적, In 추리소설이란 무엇인가?" (1997), 국학자료원
  29. 鄭京子, "小波 方定煥 文學硏究", 석사, 교육학과, pp.1997
  30. 정규웅, "추리소설의 세계" (2003), 살림
  31. 정혜영, "식민지 조선과 탐정문학", 한국문학이론과 비평, 11(2), pp.375~396 (2007), 한국문학이론과비평학회
  32. 조성면, "대중문학과 정전에 대한 반역" (2002), 소명 출판
  33. 조재룡, "‘번역문학’의 정치성에 관한 고찰 - 직역과 의역의 이분법을 넘어서", Comparative Korean Studies, 17(1), pp.109~143 (2009), 국제비교한국학회
  34. 최애순, "식민지시기 探偵小說의 飜譯과 受容 양상 및 長篇 飜譯 探偵小說 서지연구", 현대소설연구, (43), pp.481~524 (2010), 한국현대소설학회
  35. 九鬼紫郞, "探偵小說百科" (1975), 金園社
  36. 中島河太郞, "推理小說事典" (1980), 講談社
  37. "日本ミステリ〡事典" (2000), 新潮社
  38. 정태원, "韓國ミステリ事情, In 早川ミステリマガジン" (2000)
  39. Ridel, "한불전", Dictionnaire Coréen-Français), Les Missionnaires de Corée, de la Societe des Missions Etrangères de Paris, Yokohama, C. Levy Imprimeur- Librair, ~ (1890)
  40. Gale (James Scatt), "韓英字典한영뎐" (1897), The Fukuin Printing CO.

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)